• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疼痛跨专业课程设计模型

The Pain Interprofessional Curriculum Design Model.

作者信息

Watt-Watson Judy, Lax Leila, Davies Robyn, Langlois Sylvia, Oskarsson Jon, Raman-Wilms Lalitha

机构信息

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing.

Biomedical Communications, Institute of Medical Science.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):1040-1048. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw337.

DOI:10.1093/pm/pnw337
PMID:28339975
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although the University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain has successfully implemented an Interfaculty Pain Curriculum since 2002, we have never formalized the process in a design model. Therefore, our primary aim was to develop a model that provided an overview of dynamic, interrelated elements that have been important in our experience. A secondary purpose was to use the model to frame an interactive workshop for attendees interested in developing their own pain curricula.

METHODS

The faculties from Dentistry, Medicine, Nursing, Occupational Therapy, Pharmacy, and Physical Therapy met to develop the model components. Discussion focused on patient-centered pain assessment and management in an interprofessional context, with pain content being based on the International Association for the Study of Pain-Interprofessional Pain Curriculum domains and related core pain competencies. Profession-specific requirements were also considered, including regulatory/course requirements, level of students involved, type of course delivery, and pedagogic strategies.

RESULTS

The resulting Pain Interprofessional Curriculum Design Model includes components that are dynamic, competency-based, collaborative, and interrelated. Key questions important to developing curricular components guide the process. The Model framed two design workshops with very positive responses from international and national attendees.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pain Interprofessional Curriculum Design Model is based on established pain curricula and related competencies that are relevant to all health science students at the prelicensure (entry-to-practice) level. The model has been developed from our experience, and the components resonated with workshop attendees from other regions. This Model provides a basis for future interventions in curriculum design and evaluation.

摘要

目的

尽管多伦多大学疼痛研究中心自2002年以来已成功实施了跨专业疼痛课程,但我们从未将这一过程在设计模型中正式确定下来。因此,我们的主要目标是开发一个模型,该模型能概述在我们的经验中一直很重要的动态、相互关联的要素。第二个目的是使用该模型为有兴趣开发自己的疼痛课程的参与者构建一个互动式工作坊。

方法

来自牙医学、医学、护理学、职业疗法、药学和物理疗法的各学院成员会面,以开发模型组件。讨论聚焦于跨专业背景下以患者为中心的疼痛评估和管理,疼痛内容基于国际疼痛研究协会跨专业疼痛课程领域及相关核心疼痛能力。还考虑了各专业的特定要求,包括监管/课程要求、所涉及学生的水平、课程授课类型和教学策略。

结果

最终形成的跨专业疼痛课程设计模型包括动态、基于能力、协作且相互关联的组件。对开发课程组件很重要的关键问题指导着这一过程。该模型构建了两个设计工作坊,得到了国际和国内参与者的非常积极的反馈。

结论

跨专业疼痛课程设计模型基于既定的疼痛课程及与所有处于预执业(入行)水平的健康科学学生相关的相关能力。该模型是根据我们的经验开发的,其组件得到了来自其他地区的工作坊参与者的共鸣。此模型为未来课程设计和评估干预提供了基础。

相似文献

1
The Pain Interprofessional Curriculum Design Model.疼痛跨专业课程设计模型
Pain Med. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):1040-1048. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw337.
2
Evaluating an Innovative eLearning Pain Education Interprofessional Resource: A Pre-Post Study.评估创新型电子学习疼痛教育跨专业资源:一项前后研究。
Pain Med. 2019 Jan 1;20(1):37-49. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny105.
3
An interfaculty pain curriculum: lessons learned from six years experience.跨学院疼痛课程:六年经验所得
Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.010. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
4
Core competencies for pain management: results of an interprofessional consensus summit.疼痛管理核心能力:跨专业共识峰会的结果。
Pain Med. 2013 Jul;14(7):971-81. doi: 10.1111/pme.12107. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
5
Ten years of interfaculty pain curriculum at the University of Toronto: impact on student learning.多伦多大学十年的跨学院疼痛课程:对学生学习的影响。
Pain Rep. 2021 Nov 30;6(4):e974. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000974. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
6
Ten-year mixed-method evaluation of prelicensure health professional student self-reported learning in an interfaculty pain curriculum.对预执业健康专业学生在跨学院疼痛课程中自我报告学习情况的十年混合方法评估。
Pain Rep. 2022 Sep 14;7(5):e1030. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001030. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
7
Implementing an interfaculty series of courses on interprofessional collaboration in prelicensure health science curriculums.在预执业健康科学课程中实施一系列跨专业协作的跨学院课程。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2010 Apr;23(1):395. Epub 2010 Apr 16.
8
An interprofessional consensus of core competencies for prelicensure education in pain management: curriculum application for nursing.疼痛管理领域预执业教育核心能力的跨专业共识:护理课程应用
J Nurs Educ. 2015 Jun;54(6):317-27. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150515-02.
9
An integrated undergraduate pain curriculum, based on IASP curricula, for six health science faculties.一个基于国际疼痛研究协会课程体系的、面向六个健康科学学院的综合性本科疼痛课程。
Pain. 2004 Jul;110(1-2):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.019.
10
Models in interprofessional education: the IP enhancement approach as effective alternative.跨专业教育中的模式:IP增强方法作为有效的替代方案。
Work. 2012;41(3):253-60. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1293.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and attitudes toward pediatric pain management among final-year medical students in Italy: a multicenter observational study.意大利医学专业最后一年学生对儿童疼痛管理的知识与态度:一项多中心观察性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 7;184(7):401. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06197-3.
2
[Professions on the way into interprofessionalism].
Schmerz. 2022 Aug;36(4):231-232. doi: 10.1007/s00482-022-00657-7. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
3
Ten years of interfaculty pain curriculum at the University of Toronto: impact on student learning.多伦多大学十年的跨学院疼痛课程:对学生学习的影响。
Pain Rep. 2021 Nov 30;6(4):e974. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000974. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
4
Identifying the content and context of pain within paediatric rheumatology healthcare professional curricula in the UK: a summative content analysis.确定英国儿科风湿病学医疗保健专业课程中疼痛的内容和背景:一项总结性内容分析
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2021 Aug 21;19(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00614-1.
5
Interprofessional Collaboration and Involvement of Parents in the Management of Painful Procedures in Newborns.跨专业协作与家长参与新生儿疼痛性操作的管理
Front Pediatr. 2020 Jul 23;8:394. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00394. eCollection 2020.
6
The IASP pain curriculum for undergraduate allied health professionals: educators defining competence level using Dublin descriptors.国际疼痛学会本科辅助卫生专业人员疼痛课程:使用都柏林描述符定义能力水平的教育者。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Feb 28;20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1978-z.
7
[Interprofessional pain education-with, from, and about competent, collaborative practice teams to transform pain care].[跨专业疼痛教育——与专业、协作的实践团队一起,源于专业、协作的实践团队,并围绕其展开,以转变疼痛护理]
Schmerz. 2019 Feb;33(1):66-72. doi: 10.1007/s00482-018-0352-0.
8
Interprofessional pain education-with, from, and about competent, collaborative practice teams to transform pain care.跨专业疼痛教育——与有能力的协作实践团队一起、由其开展并围绕该团队进行,以转变疼痛护理。
Pain Rep. 2018 May 30;3(3):e663. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000663. eCollection 2018 May.
9
A Global Year for Pain Education: Progress, Trends, and the Way Forward.全球疼痛教育年:进展、趋势与未来方向
Pain Med. 2018 Aug 1;19(8):1507-1511. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny102.
10
Perspective: update on pain education.观点:疼痛教育的最新进展。
Pain. 2018 Sep;159(9):1681-1682. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001297.