School of Nursing.
Departments of Public Health Sciences.
Pain Med. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):2267-2279. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw341.
To describe factors associated with high clinic and emergency room (ER) use among individuals with chronic pain.
This study is part of a larger cross-sectional survey on the epidemiology of chronic pain in Canada. The current analysis was guided by the Andersen-Newman Service Utilization Model.
Respondents (N = 702) were grouped into high (top 10%) and low (bottom 90%) users based on the number of visits made to clinics and ERs over the past year. The two groups were compared on predisposing (e.g., pain self-efficacy and sociodemographic characteristics), enabling (e.g., income and education), and need (e.g., pain characteristics and number of comorbidities) factors as well as personal health behaviors (e.g., use of medications). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify characteristics associated with high use in each setting.
High users were defined as 30 or more clinic visits or one or more ER visits. The factors associated with high clinic use in the adjusted analysis were low pain self-efficacy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.50-4.51), two or more comorbidities (OR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.23-3.69), five or more pain sites (OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.28-4.14), and having an "other" pain diagnosis (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.01-3.20). Factors that increased ER use were low pain self-efficacy (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.28-3.15) and two or more comorbidities (OR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.48-3.59), while use of alternative pain management strategies reduced ER use (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21-0.84).
Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm if modifiable factors such as pain self-efficacy and use of alternative therapies reduce health care use.
描述与慢性疼痛患者高门诊和急诊就诊率相关的因素。
本研究为加拿大慢性疼痛流行病学的一项大型横断面调查的一部分。本分析以安德森-纽曼服务利用模型为指导。受访者(n=702)根据过去一年就诊诊所和急诊的次数,分为高(前 10%)和低(后 90%)就诊者。比较两组在易感性(如疼痛自我效能和社会人口学特征)、使能因素(如收入和教育)和需求(如疼痛特征和共病数量)以及个人健康行为(如药物使用)方面的差异。采用二元逻辑回归分析识别每个环境中与高就诊率相关的特征。
高就诊者定义为就诊 30 次或以上,或急诊就诊 1 次或以上。调整分析中与高门诊就诊率相关的因素包括低疼痛自我效能(比值比[OR] = 2.60,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.50-4.51)、两种或以上共病(OR = 2.13,95% CI = 1.23-3.69)、五个或以上疼痛部位(OR = 2.30,95% CI = 1.28-4.14)和其他疼痛诊断(OR = 1.78,95% CI = 1.01-3.20)。增加急诊就诊率的因素包括低疼痛自我效能(OR = 2.01,95% CI = 1.28-3.15)和两种或以上共病(OR = 2.31,95% CI = 1.48-3.59),而替代疼痛管理策略的使用减少了急诊就诊率(OR = 0.42,95% CI = 0.21-0.84)。
需要进行纵向研究来证实疼痛自我效能等可改变因素和替代治疗的使用是否可以降低医疗保健利用率。