• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父亲在接受育儿干预后的变化认知:哮喘或湿疹儿童父母的 Triple P 随机对照试验。

Fathers' Perceptions of Change Following Parenting Intervention: Randomized Controlled Trial of Triple P for Parents of Children With Asthma or Eczema.

机构信息

Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Australia.

Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Pediatr Psychol. 2017 Aug 1;42(7):792-803. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw106.

DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsw106
PMID:28339996
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test whether families' participation in an evidence-based parenting program can improve health-related outcomes reported by fathers of 2- to 10-year-old children with asthma and/or eczema.

METHODS

A 2 (Triple P-Positive Parenting Program vs. care as usual) by 3 (baseline, postintervention, 6-month follow-up) design was used, with random group assignment. Of 107 families, 51.4% (N = 55) had a father participate alongside the child's mother, who was the primary intervention target. Fathers completed questionnaires assessing illness-related child behavior problems; self-efficacy with illness management and illness-related child behavior problems; and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Secondary intent-to-treat analyses indicated improved child behavior and self-efficacy for managing eczema, but not asthma. Health-related quality of life improved for children, but not parents/families. There were no other significant intervention effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention outcomes were positive for eczema but not asthma, and did not depend on the extent of father participation in the intervention.

摘要

目的

检验家庭参与循证育子计划能否改善 2 至 10 岁哮喘和/或湿疹患儿父亲报告的与健康相关的结果。

方法

采用 2(Triple P-正性育子计划与常规护理)×3(基线、干预后、6 个月随访)设计,随机分组。107 个家庭中,51.4%(N=55)的父亲与孩子的母亲一起参与,母亲是主要干预对象。父亲们完成了评估与疾病相关的儿童行为问题、疾病管理和与疾病相关的儿童行为问题自我效能感以及健康相关生活质量的问卷。

结果

次要意向治疗分析显示,湿疹的儿童行为和自我效能感得到改善,但哮喘没有。儿童的健康相关生活质量有所提高,但父母/家庭没有。没有其他显著的干预效果。

结论

干预结果对湿疹是积极的,但对哮喘不是,而且不取决于父亲参与干预的程度。

相似文献

1
Fathers' Perceptions of Change Following Parenting Intervention: Randomized Controlled Trial of Triple P for Parents of Children With Asthma or Eczema.父亲在接受育儿干预后的变化认知:哮喘或湿疹儿童父母的 Triple P 随机对照试验。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2017 Aug 1;42(7):792-803. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw106.
2
Effects of Triple P parenting intervention on child health outcomes for childhood asthma and eczema: Randomised controlled trial.三重 P 亲职干预对儿童哮喘和湿疹儿童健康结局的影响:随机对照试验。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Aug;83:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
Randomized controlled trial of Triple P for parents of children with asthma or eczema: Effects on parenting and child behavior.随机对照试验 Triple P 对哮喘或湿疹儿童父母的影响:对育儿和儿童行为的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Apr;85(4):283-296. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000177.
4
Brief parenting intervention (Triple P) for families of children with eczema: a randomized controlled trial.针对湿疹儿童家庭的简短育儿干预(三级预防项目):一项随机对照试验。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2024 Jun 13;49(6):429-441. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsae023.
5
Enhancing Father Engagement and Interparental Teamwork in an Evidence-Based Parenting Intervention: A Randomized-Controlled Trial of Outcomes and Processes.在基于证据的育儿干预中提高父亲参与度和父母间的团队合作:一项关于结果与过程的随机对照试验
Behav Ther. 2015 Nov;46(6):749-63. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
Do Parents Benefit From Help When Completing a Self-Guided Parenting Program Online? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Triple P Online With and Without Telephone Support.家长在完成在线自我指导式育儿计划时是否受益于帮助?一项比较 Triple P Online 有和无电话支持的随机对照试验。
Behav Ther. 2018 Nov;49(6):1020-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
7
Optimising child outcomes from parenting interventions: fathers' experiences, preferences and barriers to participation.优化育儿干预措施对儿童的成效:父亲的经历、偏好及参与障碍。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 7;17(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4426-1.
8
DOES A PERINATAL PARENTING INTERVENTION WORK FOR FATHERS? A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.围产期育儿干预对父亲有效吗?一项随机对照试验。
Infant Ment Health J. 2018 Nov;39(6):687-698. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21748. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
9
Study protocol: evaluation of an online, father-inclusive, universal parenting intervention to reduce child externalising behaviours and improve parenting practices.研究方案:评估一种在线的、包含父亲的、普遍的育儿干预措施,以减少儿童的外化行为,改善育儿实践。
BMC Psychol. 2017 Jun 19;5(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40359-017-0188-x.
10
Training pediatric residents to provide parent education: a randomized controlled trial.培训儿科住院医师开展家长教育:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Pediatr. 2014 Jul-Aug;14(4):353-60. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.03.009.

引用本文的文献

1
Brief parenting intervention (Triple P) for families of children with eczema: a randomized controlled trial.针对湿疹儿童家庭的简短育儿干预(三级预防项目):一项随机对照试验。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2024 Jun 13;49(6):429-441. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsae023.
2
Bidirectional relationships between psychological health and dermatological conditions in children.儿童心理健康与皮肤病状况之间的双向关系。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018 Jul 31;11:289-298. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S117583. eCollection 2018.
3
Parental Perceptions of Child Vulnerability in Families of Youth With Spina Bifida: the Role of Parental Distress and Parenting Stress.
家长对患有脊柱裂的青少年家庭中儿童脆弱性的看法:父母痛苦和育儿压力的作用。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Jun 1;43(5):513-524. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx133.