Behavioral and Cellular Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Texas A&M Institute for Neuroscience (TAMIN), College Station, Texas, USA.
Pain Med. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):2170-2180. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx050.
Pain is the most frequent complaint of burn-injured patients. Opioids are commonly used in the course of treatment. However, there is a lack of rodent studies that examine the differential effects of various opioids on burn pain.
This study compared the ability of morphine, oxycodone, and hydrocodone to suppress the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia and reduce pain sensitivity.
Mice were examined for their baseline pain sensitivity thresholds using the von Frey Filaments test. Then, they were subjected to burn or sham injury and treated orally with morphine, oxycodone, hydrocodone (20 or 40 mg/kg), or saline twice daily throughout the study. They were retested on days 4, 7, 11, 14, 21, and 28 postburn.
In the sham animals, morphine produced significant opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Development of OIH was minimal for hydrocodone and was not observed for oxycodone. Secondary mechanical allodynia was observed beginning four days after the burn injury and intensified with time. All opioids produced comparable antinociceptive effects. Hydrocodone was effective in suppressing the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia and fully treated the burn-induced increase in pain sensitivity. In contrast, morphine and oxycodone had only minimal effects on the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia and only partially treated the burn-induced increase in pain sensitivity.
This study demonstrated that hydrocodone is effective in suppressing the development of burn-induced mechanical allodynia, while both morphine and oxycodone had minimal effects. These findings underscore the need for additional studies on the differences among various opioids using clinically relevant pain models.
疼痛是烧伤患者最常见的抱怨。阿片类药物在治疗过程中经常被使用。然而,缺乏研究检查不同阿片类药物对烧伤疼痛的差异影响。
本研究比较了吗啡、羟考酮和氢可酮抑制烧伤引起的机械性痛觉过敏和降低疼痛敏感性的能力。
使用 von Frey 细丝测试检查小鼠的基线疼痛敏感性阈值。然后,他们接受烧伤或假损伤,并在整个研究期间每天两次口服吗啡、羟考酮、氢可酮(20 或 40mg/kg)或生理盐水。在烧伤后第 4、7、11、14、21 和 28 天进行重新测试。
在假动物中,吗啡产生了显著的阿片类药物引起的痛觉过敏(OIH)。氢可酮产生的 OIH 最小,而羟考酮则没有观察到。继发性机械性痛觉过敏始于烧伤后四天,并随着时间的推移而加剧。所有阿片类药物都产生了相当的镇痛作用。氢可酮可有效抑制烧伤引起的机械性痛觉过敏,并完全治疗烧伤引起的疼痛敏感性增加。相比之下,吗啡和羟考酮对烧伤引起的机械性痛觉过敏的发展只有轻微影响,仅部分治疗烧伤引起的疼痛敏感性增加。
本研究表明,氢可酮可有效抑制烧伤引起的机械性痛觉过敏,而吗啡和羟考酮的作用则较小。这些发现强调了需要使用临床相关的疼痛模型研究各种阿片类药物之间的差异。