Posselt Miriam, McDonald Karalyn, Procter Nicholas, de Crespigny Charlotte, Galletly Cherrie
Discipline of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Level 4, Eleanor Harrald Building, Frome Rd, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 24;17(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4186-y.
South Australia (SA) has resettled 151,134 refugees in the last ten years (Department of Immigration and Border Protection, Settlement reporting facility, 2014). Northern metropolitan Adelaide, an area which experiences significant social disadvantage, has received a significant number of (predominantly young) refugees. Research indicates that refugee youth are at elevated risk of mental health (MH) and alcohol and other drug (AOD) problems. These factors, along with the low socio-economic status of northern Adelaide, the number of refugee youth residing there, and the added complexity of treating comorbid MH and AOD problems (comorbidity) prompted this research. We investigated the barriers and facilitators to culturally responsive comorbidity care for these youth and whether the MH and AOD services were equipped to provide such support.
This mixed-methods study employed semi-structured interviews with refugee youth and service providers and an online survey with managers of services. Thirty participants (15 refugee youth, 15 service providers) took part in the semi-structured interviews and 56 (40 complete, 16 partially-complete) in the survey.
Thematic analysis of the interview data revealed the most commonly reported barriers related to four broad areas: (1) organisational and structural, (2) access and engagement, (3) treatment and service delivery, and (4) training and resources. Survey data supported the barriers identified in the qualitative findings.
This research highlights significant gaps in the response of MH and AOD services to refugee youth with comorbidity. Based on the findings, ways of overcoming the barriers are discussed, and are of particular relevance to policy makers, organisations and clinicians.
南澳大利亚州(SA)在过去十年中安置了151,134名难民(移民与边境保护部,安置报告设施,2014年)。阿德莱德北部大都市地区社会劣势明显,接收了大量(主要是年轻的)难民。研究表明,难民青年心理健康(MH)以及酒精和其他药物(AOD)问题的风险较高。这些因素,再加上阿德莱德北部的社会经济地位较低、居住在那里的难民青年数量以及治疗合并的MH和AOD问题(共病)的额外复杂性,促使了这项研究。我们调查了为这些青年提供具有文化响应性的共病护理的障碍和促进因素,以及MH和AOD服务机构是否有能力提供此类支持。
这项混合方法研究采用了对难民青年和服务提供者的半结构化访谈以及对服务管理人员的在线调查。30名参与者(15名难民青年、15名服务提供者)参与了半结构化访谈,56人(40人完整、16人部分完整)参与了调查。
对访谈数据的主题分析揭示了最常报告的与四个广泛领域相关的障碍:(1)组织和结构,(2)获取和参与,(3)治疗和服务提供,以及(4)培训和资源。调查数据支持了定性研究结果中确定的障碍。
这项研究突出了MH和AOD服务机构对患有共病的难民青年的应对措施中存在的重大差距。基于研究结果,讨论了克服这些障碍的方法,这些方法对政策制定者、组织和临床医生尤为重要。