• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植候选者中HLA抗体与不同致敏事件之间的关联

Association Between HLA Antibodies and Different Sensitization Events in Renal Transplant Candidates.

作者信息

Akgul S U, Ciftci H S, Temurhan S, Caliskan Y, Bayraktar A, Tefik T, Kaya I A, Canitez I O, Demir E, Yazici H, Bakkaloglu H, Aydin A E, Turkmen A, Nane I, Aydin F, Oguz F S

机构信息

Department of Medical Biology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Medical Biology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2017 Apr;49(3):425-429. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.02.004.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.02.004
PMID:28340805
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allo-immunization is caused by various events such as blood transfusions, pregnancies, or organ transplantations, which can lead to sensitization. In this retrospective study, we evaluated different sensitization models and their effects on panel-reactive antibody (PRA) profiles of renal transplantation candidates.

METHODS

Anti-HLA class I/II antibody screening tests were performed in 906 renal transplantation candidates with the use of a microbead-based assay (Luminex).

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-seven (32.8%) of the patients were determined as positive in terms of PRA, and 609 (67.2%) were negative. Sensitized and non-sensitized patients were compared separately in terms of each sensitization type. The anti-HLA class I, II, and I+II positivity rates in patients sensitized only by blood transfusion were 13.1%, 6.3%, and 14.1%, the rates with pregnancy sensitization were 35.5%, 29%, and 45.2%, and rates with previous transplantation sensitization were 15.6%, 34.4%, and 38.9%, respectively. Prevalence of PRA positivity was significantly higher in patients with previous pregnancy than with transplantation and transfusion (odds ratio, 1.003; 95% confidence interval, 0.441-2.281; P = .031). The risk of developing HLA class I antibodies was higher in pregnancies (P < .001), and the risk of developing anti-HLA class II antibodies was higher in patients who had undergone a previous transplantation (P < .001). The rate of developing HLA-B antibodies in patients sensitized by pregnancy were significantly higher compared with sensitization after transfusion (P = .015), as was the rate of developing HLA-DQ antibodies in patients sensitized by previous transplantation compared with sensitization through pregnancy (P = .042).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who are waiting for kidney transplantation, sensitization by pregnancy and transplantation have a significant impact on development of HLA class I and class II antibodies.

摘要

背景

人类白细胞抗原(HLA)同种免疫是由输血、妊娠或器官移植等多种事件引起的,这些事件可导致致敏。在这项回顾性研究中,我们评估了不同的致敏模型及其对肾移植候选者群体反应性抗体(PRA)谱的影响。

方法

使用基于微珠的检测方法(Luminex)对906名肾移植候选者进行了抗HLA I/II类抗体筛查试验。

结果

297名(32.8%)患者的PRA检测呈阳性,609名(67.2%)呈阴性。分别根据每种致敏类型对致敏和未致敏患者进行比较。仅因输血致敏的患者中,抗HLA I类、II类和I+II类阳性率分别为13.1%、6.3%和14.1%;因妊娠致敏的患者中,阳性率分别为35.5%、29%和45.2%;既往有移植致敏史的患者中,阳性率分别为15.6%、34.4%和38.9%。既往妊娠患者的PRA阳性率显著高于移植和输血患者(优势比,1.003;95%置信区间,0.441-2.281;P = 0.031)。妊娠患者产生HLA I类抗体的风险更高(P < 0.001),既往接受过移植的患者产生抗HLA II类抗体的风险更高(P < 0.001)。与输血致敏相比,妊娠致敏患者产生HLA-B抗体的比率显著更高(P = 0.015),与妊娠致敏相比,既往移植致敏患者产生HLA-DQ抗体的比率也更高(P = 0.042)。

结论

在等待肾移植的患者中,妊娠和移植致敏对HLA I类和II类抗体的产生有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Association Between HLA Antibodies and Different Sensitization Events in Renal Transplant Candidates.肾移植候选者中HLA抗体与不同致敏事件之间的关联
Transplant Proc. 2017 Apr;49(3):425-429. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.02.004.
2
Effect of Single Sensitization Event on Human Leukocyte Antigen Alloimmunization in Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Single-Center Experience.单次致敏事件对肾移植候选者人类白细胞抗原同种免疫的影响:单中心经验
Exp Clin Transplant. 2018 Feb;16(1):44-49. doi: 10.6002/ect.2016.0292. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
3
De novo produced anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies relation to alloimmunity in patients with chronic renal failure.慢性肾衰竭患者中新生抗人白细胞抗原抗体与同种免疫的关系
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2015 Jun;19(6):335-8. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2014.0294. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
4
Effects of different sensitization events on HLA alloimmunization in renal transplant cases; a retrospective observation in 1066 cases.不同致敏事件对肾移植病例 HLA 同种免疫的影响;1066 例回顾性观察。
Transpl Immunol. 2022 Dec;75:101680. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101680. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
5
Effects of different sensitization events on HLA alloimmunization in solid organ transplantation patients.不同致敏事件对实体器官移植患者HLA同种免疫的影响。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Jan;44(1):222-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.049.
6
Analysis of the Humoral Immune Response to Human Leukocyte Antigens in Turkish Renal Transplant Candidates and Relationship Between Autoimmune Disorders.土耳其肾移植候选者对人类白细胞抗原的体液免疫反应分析及自身免疫性疾病之间的关系
Transplant Proc. 2015 Jun;47(5):1326-30. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.04.066.
7
Analysis of Panel Reactive Antibodies in Renal Transplant Recipients Detected by Luminex: A Single-Center Experience.通过Luminex检测肾移植受者群体反应性抗体的分析:单中心经验
Exp Clin Transplant. 2016 Aug;14(4):401-4. doi: 10.6002/ect.2014.0285. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
Effect of Different Sensitization Events on HLA Alloimmunization in Kidney Transplantation Candidates.不同致敏事件对肾移植候选者HLA致敏的影响。
Transplant Proc. 2015 May;47(4):894-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.03.014.
9
Risk factors of sensitization to human leukocyte antigen in end-stage renal disease patients.终末期肾病患者对人类白细胞抗原致敏的危险因素。
Hum Immunol. 2014 Jun;75(6):531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2014.02.024. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
10
DETERMINATION OF THE PRA POSITIVITY PERCENTAGE IN MALE PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE BY USING FLOW CYTOMETRY TECHNIQUE.采用流式细胞术技术测定慢性肾脏病男性患者的 Pra 阳性率。
Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Aug;62(2):262-269. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.02.02.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual crossmatching reveals upregulation of placental HLA-Class II in chronic histiocytic intervillositis.虚拟交叉配型显示慢性组织细胞性绒毛膜炎中胎盘 HLA-II 类分子上调。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69315-5.
2
Desensitization Strategies for Donor-Specific Antibodies in HLA-Mismatched Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients: What We Know and What We Do Not Know.HLA 不匹配干细胞移植受者中供者特异性抗体的脱敏策略:我们所知与未知
Oncol Ther. 2024 Sep;12(3):375-394. doi: 10.1007/s40487-024-00283-6. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
3
Ageing on the impact of distribution about preformed anti-HLA and anti-MICA antibody specificities in recipients prior to initial HSCT from East China.
中国东部地区初次异基因造血干细胞移植前受者中衰老对预先形成的抗HLA和抗MICA抗体特异性分布的影响
Immun Ageing. 2024 Feb 20;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12979-024-00417-4.
4
Effect of panel reactive antibodies on T cell immunity reinstatement following renal transplantation.群体反应性抗体对肾移植后T细胞免疫恢复的影响。
World J Transplant. 2022 Oct 18;12(10):313-324. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v12.i10.313.
5
Perioperative risks of bariatric surgery among patients with and without history of solid organ transplant.肥胖症手术患者中有无实体器官移植史的围手术期风险。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Sep;20(9):2530-2539. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15883. Epub 2020 May 8.
6
Anti-HLA Class II Antibodies Correlate with C-Reactive Protein Levels in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Associated with Interstitial Lung Disease.抗 HLA Ⅱ类抗体与类风湿关节炎相关间质性肺病患者的 C 反应蛋白水平相关。
Cells. 2020 Mar 11;9(3):691. doi: 10.3390/cells9030691.
7
Pretransplant Kinetics of Anti-HLA Antibodies in Patients on the Waiting List for Kidney Transplantation.移植前等待肾移植患者的抗 HLA 抗体动力学。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Nov;30(11):2262-2274. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019060594. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
8
Opportunistic parasitoses among Egyptian hemodialysis patients in relation to CD4+ T-cell counts: a comparative study.埃及血液透析患者中与 CD4+ T 细胞计数相关的机会性寄生虫感染:一项对比研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 May 29;19(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4110-4.
9
Kidney Transplantation: The Challenge of Human Leukocyte Antigen and Its Therapeutic Strategies.肾移植:人类白细胞抗原的挑战及其治疗策略。
J Immunol Res. 2018 Mar 5;2018:5986740. doi: 10.1155/2018/5986740. eCollection 2018.