Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, ASPREE - Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct;43(10):714-722. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103967. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
: Genetic research into ageing, longevity and late-onset disease is becoming increasingly common. Yet, there is a paucity of knowledge related to clinical actionability and the return of pathogenic variants to otherwise healthy elderly individuals. Whether or not genetic research in the elderly should be managed differently from standard practices adapted for younger populations has not yet been defined. In this article, we provide an overview of ethical and practical challenges in preparing for a genetic study of over 14 000 healthy Australians aged 70 years or older enrolled in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) Healthy Ageing Biobank. At the time of consent, all participants in this study were free of life-threatening illness, cardiovascular disease or cognitive impairment. ASPREE is thus a cohort of healthy elderly individuals with seemingly minimal burden of genetic disease recruited without ascertainment bias. The cohort presents a unique opportunity to address the penetrance of known pathogenic variants in a population without disease symptoms; however, it also raises a number of ethical concerns regarding the interpretation and disclosure of variants with known clinical actionability. Some of the challenges include (a) how to manage the interpretation, disclosure and actioning of pathogenic variants found in otherwise healthy elderly adults without disease symptoms, (b) whether or not to disclose findings for the benefit of family members rather than elderly consented donors themselves, (c) how to manage the return of genetic findings to the elderly individuals who are now in severe cognitive decline or terminal illness, (d) how to ensure quality of information and clinical service upon disclosure of results to this demographic and (e) how to prepare for the insurance implications of disclosing genetic information under Australian law. We discuss these and other dilemmas and propose a defensible plan of management.
ISRCTN83772183.
衰老、长寿和迟发性疾病的遗传研究越来越普遍。然而,与临床可操作性以及将致病性变体返回给其他健康老年人相关的知识却很少。遗传研究是否应该与为年轻人群体制定的标准实践有所不同,尚未得到明确界定。在本文中,我们概述了在为一项针对 14000 多名年龄在 70 岁或以上的健康澳大利亚人进行的遗传研究做准备时所面临的伦理和实际挑战,这些人都参加了阿司匹林减少老年人事件研究(ASPREE)健康老龄化生物库。在同意参与本研究时,所有参与者均未患有危及生命的疾病、心血管疾病或认知障碍。因此,ASPREE 是一个由看似遗传疾病负担最小的健康老年人组成的队列,他们是在没有确定偏倚的情况下招募的。该队列为解决在没有疾病症状的人群中已知致病性变体的外显率提供了一个独特的机会;然而,它也引发了一些关于解释和披露具有已知临床可操作性的变体的伦理问题。其中一些挑战包括:(a) 如何管理在没有疾病症状的健康老年成年人中发现的致病性变体的解释、披露和处理;(b) 是否为了家庭成员的利益而不是为了同意的老年人本身披露发现结果;(c) 如何管理将遗传发现返还给现在处于严重认知衰退或终末期疾病的老年人;(d) 如何确保向这一人群披露结果后的信息和临床服务质量;以及 (e) 如何根据澳大利亚法律披露遗传信息的保险影响做好准备。我们讨论了这些和其他困境,并提出了一个合理的管理计划。
ISRCTN83772183。