Suppr超能文献

功能生成路径技术设计的单冠修复体的固位与非固位时间变化:一项随机临床试验。

Occlusion and Disocclusion Time Changes in Single Unit Crowns Designed by Functional Generated Path Technique: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology & National Clinical Research Centre for Oral Disease & Shaanxi key Laboratory of Oral Disease, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, P.R. China.

Department of Stomatology, PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing, 100700, P. R. China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 24;7(1):388. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00408-0.

Abstract

Although it is believed that implementation of the functional generated path (FGP) technique can facilitate occlusal surface design for restorations, it has not been objectively compared in situ with the conventional fabrication yet. Therefore, in the present study, a single-blind crossover clinical trial was conducted using T-scan to compare changes in occlusion time (OT) and disocclusion time (DT) of single posterior artificial crowns designed differently using FGP technique (FGP), average-value FGP technique (AVR) and conventional fabrication (CON). Each of the 10 participants took part in the study tried three artificial crowns in different sequences according to a computer generated randomization list. The results objectively revealed that changes in OT and DT were significantly smaller for FGP than CON (P < 0.05) and considerably smaller for AVR than CON, respectively. The subjective feedback and the occlusal adjusting time were better and shorter for FGP and AVR than CON (P < 0.05). No harm to the participants occurred. Overall, FGP is an efficient technique showing more physiological harmonious relationship with the articulating system.

摘要

尽管人们认为功能性生成路径(FGP)技术的实施可以促进修复体的咬合面设计,但它尚未与传统制作方法在原位进行客观比较。因此,本研究采用 T-扫描进行了一项单盲交叉临床试验,比较了使用 FGP 技术(FGP)、平均 FGP 技术(AVR)和传统制作方法(CON)设计的单个后牙人工冠的咬合时间(OT)和非咬合时间(DT)的变化。10 名参与者中的每一位都按照计算机生成的随机列表,以不同的顺序尝试了三种人工冠。结果客观地表明,OT 和 DT 的变化在 FGP 中比 CON 小(P<0.05),在 AVR 中比 CON 小得多。与 CON 相比,FGP 和 AVR 的主观反馈和咬合调整时间更好、更短(P<0.05)。研究过程中没有对参与者造成任何伤害。总体而言,FGP 是一种高效的技术,与牙合系统具有更生理协调的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5c9/5428478/3d902c1c383a/41598_2017_408_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验