Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital and INSERM U1234, Centre de référence des maladies bulleuses autoimmunes, Normandie University, Rouen, France.
Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital and INSERM U1234, Centre de référence des maladies bulleuses autoimmunes, Normandie University, Rouen, France.
Lancet. 2017 May 20;389(10083):2031-2040. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30070-3. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
High doses of corticosteroids are considered the standard treatment for pemphigus. Because long-term corticosteroid treatment can cause severe and even life-threatening side-effects in patients with this disease, we assessed whether first-line use of rituximab as adjuvant therapy could improve the proportion of patients achieving complete remission off-therapy, compared with corticosteroid treatment alone, while decreasing treatment side-effects of corticosteroids.
We did a prospective, multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised trial in 25 dermatology hospital departments in France (Ritux 3). Eligible participants were patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus aged 18-80 years being treated for the first time (not at the time of a relapse). We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to receive either oral prednisone alone, 1·0 or 1·5 mg/kg per day tapered over 12 or 18 months (prednisone alone group), or 1000 mg of intravenous rituximab on days 0 and 14, and 500 mg at months 12 and 18, combined with a short-term prednisone regimen, 0·5 or 1·0 mg/kg per day tapered over 3 or 6 months (rituximab plus short-term prednisone group). Follow-up was for 3 years (study visits were scheduled weekly during the first month of the study, then monthly until month 24, then an additional visit at month 36). Treatment was assigned through central computer-generated randomisation, with stratification according to disease-severity (severe or moderate, based on Harman's criteria). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved complete remission off-therapy at month 24 (intention-to-treat analysis). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00784589.
Between May 10, 2010, and Dec 7, 2012, we enrolled 91 patients and randomly assigned 90 to treatment (90 were analysed; 1 patient withdrew consent before the random assignment). At month 24, 41 (89%) of 46 patients assigned to rituximab plus short-term prednisone were in complete remission off-therapy versus 15 (34%) of 44 assigned to prednisone alone (absolute difference 55 percentage points, 95% CI 38·4-71·7; p<0·0001. This difference corresponded to a relative risk of success of 2·61 (95% CI 1·71-3·99, p<0·0001), corresponding to 1·82 patients (95% CI 1·39-2·60) who would need to be treated with rituximab plus prednisone (rather than prednisone alone) for one additional success. No patient died during the study. More severe adverse events of grade 3-4 were reported in the prednisone-alone group (53 events in 29 patients; mean 1·20 [SD 1·25]) than in the rituximab plus prednisone group (27 events in 16 patients; mean 0·59 [1·15]; p=0·0021). The most common of these events in both groups were diabetes and endocrine disorder (11 [21%] with prednisone alone vs six [22%] with rituximab plus prednisone), myopathy (ten [19%] vs three [11%]), and bone disorders (five [9%] vs five [19%]).
Data from our trial suggest that first-line use of rituximab plus short-term prednisone for patients with pemphigus is more effective than using prednisone alone, with fewer adverse events.
French Ministry of Health, French Society of Dermatology, Roche.
大剂量皮质类固醇被认为是天疱疮的标准治疗方法。由于长期皮质类固醇治疗会导致患者出现严重甚至危及生命的副作用,因此我们评估了利妥昔单抗作为辅助治疗的一线药物是否可以提高完全缓解停药的患者比例,与单独使用皮质类固醇相比,同时减少皮质类固醇的治疗副作用。
我们在法国的 25 个皮肤科医院进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、平行组、开放标签、随机试验(Ritux 3)。纳入的患者为首次诊断为天疱疮的新患者,年龄 18-80 岁,正在首次接受治疗(非复发时)。我们将患者随机分配(1:1)接受口服泼尼松单独治疗,每天 1.0 或 1.5mg/kg,在 12 或 18 个月内逐渐减少(泼尼松单独组),或在第 0 和 14 天静脉注射 1000mg 利妥昔单抗,然后在第 12 和 18 个月每月注射 500mg,同时接受短期泼尼松治疗方案,每天 0.5 或 1.0mg/kg,在 3 或 6 个月内逐渐减少(利妥昔单抗联合短期泼尼松组)。随访时间为 3 年(研究访问在研究的第一个月每周安排一次,然后每月一次,直到第 24 个月,然后在第 36 个月再进行一次额外访问)。通过中央计算机生成的随机分配治疗,根据疾病严重程度分层(根据 Harman 标准分为严重或中度)。主要终点是第 24 个月时无治疗缓解的患者比例(意向治疗分析)。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT00784589。
2010 年 5 月 10 日至 2012 年 12 月 7 日期间,我们共招募了 91 名患者,并将 90 名患者随机分配到治疗组(90 名患者进行了分析;1 名患者在随机分配前撤回了同意)。在第 24 个月时,46 名接受利妥昔单抗联合短期泼尼松治疗的患者中有 41 名(89%)达到无治疗缓解,而 44 名接受泼尼松单独治疗的患者中只有 15 名(34%)(绝对差异 55 个百分点,95%CI 38.4-71.7;p<0.0001)。这一差异对应于成功的相对风险为 2.61(95%CI 1.71-3.99,p<0.0001),意味着需要用利妥昔单抗联合泼尼松(而不是单独使用泼尼松)治疗的患者人数增加 1.82 人(95%CI 1.39-2.60),才能额外获得一次成功。在研究期间没有患者死亡。泼尼松单独治疗组报告的 3-4 级严重不良事件多于利妥昔单抗联合泼尼松组(29 名患者中有 53 例;平均 1.20[标准差 1.25])(27 例中有 16 例;平均 0.59[1.15];p=0.0021)。在两组中最常见的这些事件是糖尿病和内分泌紊乱(泼尼松单独组 11 例[21%],利妥昔单抗联合泼尼松组 6 例[22%])、肌病(泼尼松单独组 10 例[19%],利妥昔单抗联合泼尼松组 3 例[11%])和骨骼疾病(泼尼松单独组 5 例[9%],利妥昔单抗联合泼尼松组 5 例[19%])。
我们的试验数据表明,与单独使用泼尼松相比,利妥昔单抗联合短期泼尼松作为天疱疮患者的一线治疗方法更有效,且不良事件更少。
法国卫生部、法国皮肤科协会、罗氏公司。