Suppr超能文献

早期硬腭修复中犁骨瓣的可靠性如何?

How reliable is the vomer flap in early hard palate repair?

作者信息

Martin-Smith James D, Fitzgerald Louise, Orr David J A

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Our Lady's Children's Hospital Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Our Lady's Children's Hospital Crumlin, Dublin 12, Ireland.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Jun;70(6):828-832. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

Abstract

Hard palate closure with a vomer flap at the time of lip repair has been widely adopted. A recent study by Deshpande et al. showed a high rate of failure of the vomer flap and led the authors to abandon the technique. We conducted a retrospective study of vomer flap healing in a consecutive series of cases performed by the senior author (D.O.). The case records of 71 patients who underwent repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate with a vomer flap at the time of lip repair were studied. Vomer flap healing was assessed and documented by the senior author at the time of definitive palate closure, and this was recorded. Adequate records were available for 66 cases. Twelve patients (18%) had associated syndromes and were included in the analysis. The median age at the time of lip and vomer flap repair was 3.5 months, and that at the time of palate repair was 8 months. At definitive palatoplasty, the vomer flap was intact in 62 patients (94%). Four patients (6%) had partial or complete failure of the vomer flap. All failures occurred in cases where the vomer flap was sutured directly to the nasal mucosa, a technique since abandoned in favour of double-breasting the flap to the raw surface of the oral mucosa. Five patients had incomplete healing of the palate following definitive palatoplasty, two of whom had a previous vomer flap failure. Contrary to Deshpande et al., we found the vomer flap to be highly reliable in closing the hard palate at the time of primary lip repair.

摘要

在唇裂修复时采用犁骨瓣进行硬腭关闭已被广泛应用。Deshpande等人最近的一项研究显示犁骨瓣的失败率很高,导致作者放弃了该技术。我们对资深作者(D.O.)连续进行的一系列病例中的犁骨瓣愈合情况进行了回顾性研究。研究了71例在唇裂修复时采用犁骨瓣进行单侧唇腭裂修复的患者的病例记录。资深作者在最终腭部关闭时对犁骨瓣的愈合情况进行了评估和记录。66例患者有足够的记录。12例患者(18%)伴有综合征并纳入分析。唇裂和犁骨瓣修复时的中位年龄为3.5个月,腭部修复时的中位年龄为8个月。在最终腭裂修复时,62例患者(94%)的犁骨瓣完整。4例患者(6%)的犁骨瓣部分或完全失败。所有失败均发生在犁骨瓣直接缝合至鼻黏膜的病例中,该技术后来已被放弃,转而采用将瓣片双层缝合至口腔黏膜创面上的方法。5例患者在最终腭裂修复后腭部愈合不完全,其中2例曾有犁骨瓣失败。与Deshpande等人的研究结果相反,我们发现犁骨瓣在一期唇裂修复时关闭硬腭非常可靠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验