Suppr超能文献

在网络内医院与驻院医生发生非故意的网络外诊疗接触的风险。

The risk of unintentional out-of-network encounters with hospital-based physicians at in-network hospitals.

作者信息

Brown Lawrence H, Weston Robert A, Gough John E

机构信息

Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas-Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA; Mount Isa Centre for Rural & Remote Health, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas-Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;35(9):1228-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.033. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

When hospital-based specialists including emergency physicians, anesthesiologists, pathologists and radiologists are not included in the same insurance networks as their parent hospitals, it creates confusion and leads to unexpected costs for patients. This study explored the frequency with which hospital-based physicians at academic medical centers are not included in the network directories for the same insurance networks as their parent teaching hospitals.

METHODS

We studied teaching hospitals with residency programs in all four hospital-based specialties. Using insurance plan provider directories, we determined whether each teaching hospital was in-network for randomly selected locally available insurance plans offered through the federal and state marketplace exchanges. For each established hospital-network relationship, we then determined whether hospital-based specialists were included in the provider network directory by searching for the name of each specialty's residency program director and the name of the physician practice group.

RESULTS

We identified 79 teaching hospitals participating in 144 locally available insurance plan networks. Hospital-based specialist inclusion in these hospital-network relationships was: emergency physicians: 50.0% (CI: 40%-59%); anesthesiologists: 50.0% (CI: 42%-58%); pathologists: 45.4% (CI: 37%-54%); and radiologists: 55.1% (46%-64%). Inclusion of all four hospital-based specialties occurred in only 45.0% (CI: 36%-54%) of the hospital-network relationships.

CONCLUSION

For insurance plans offered through the federal and state marketplace exchanges, hospital-based specialists frequently are not included in the directories for the insurance networks in which their parent teaching hospitals participate. Further research is needed to explore this issue at non-academic hospitals and for off-exchange insurance products, and to determine effective policy solutions.

摘要

目的

当包括急诊医生、麻醉医生、病理医生和放射科医生在内的医院专科医生不在与其所属医院相同的保险网络中时,会造成混乱并给患者带来意外费用。本研究探讨了学术医疗中心的医院专科医生未被纳入与其所属教学医院相同保险网络的名录中的频率。

方法

我们研究了在所有四个医院专科领域设有住院医师培训项目的教学医院。利用保险计划提供商名录,我们确定每家教学医院是否在通过联邦和州市场交易所提供的随机选择的当地可用保险计划的网络内。对于每一种既定的医院-网络关系,我们随后通过搜索每个专科住院医师培训项目主任的姓名和医生执业组的名称,来确定医院专科医生是否被纳入提供商网络名录。

结果

我们确定了79家参与144个当地可用保险计划网络的教学医院。在这些医院-网络关系中,医院专科医生的纳入情况如下:急诊医生:50.0%(置信区间:40%-59%);麻醉医生:50.0%(置信区间:42%-58%);病理医生:45.4%(置信区间:37%-54%);放射科医生:55.1%(46%-64%)。所有四个医院专科领域的医生都被纳入的情况仅出现在45.0%(置信区间:36%-54%)的医院-网络关系中。

结论

对于通过联邦和州市场交易所提供的保险计划,医院专科医生经常未被纳入其所属教学医院参与的保险网络的名录中。需要进一步研究以探讨非学术医院以及非交易所保险产品的这一问题,并确定有效的政策解决方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验