Suppr超能文献

医疗保险优势健康计划在网络较窄的时代发布的皮肤科网络医生名录的准确性。

The accuracy of dermatology network physician directories posted by Medicare Advantage health plans in an era of narrow networks.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Dec;150(12):1290-7. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3902.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Insurers are increasingly deploying “narrow networks” with fewer contracted physicians both in health plans offered in new state exchanges under the Affordable Care Act and in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, which are commercial alternatives offered to Medicare beneficiaries. Patients choosing health plans rely on the accuracy of network directories posted by insurers. The MA plans must meet network adequacy requirements,and inaccurate directories of participating physicians might prejudice those determinations.OBJECTIVE To determine the accuracy of MA plan directories of participating dermatologists,and the appointment availability of listed physicians.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Scripted telephone calls were placed to every dermatologist listed in directories for the largest MA plans in 12 US metropolitan areas. The caller sought an appointment on behalf of his fictitious father who had severe itch for several months, asked whether the dermatologist accepted the relevant plan, and asked for the next available appointment date.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Appointment availability and wait time.RESULTS Among 4754 total physician listings, 45.5%represented duplicates in the same plan directory. Among the remaining unique listings, 48.9% of physicians were reachable,accepted the listed plan, and offered an appointment for our fictitious patient. Many of the dermatologists listed had incorrect contact information, were deceased, retired, or had moved, were not accepting new patients, did not accept the insurance plan, or were subspecialized. The mean (range) wait time for appointments among the remaining listings was 45.5 (1-414) days. Both the accuracy of network directories and the appointment wait times varied substantially by health plan and metropolitan area. For 1 plan, our caller was unable to obtain an appointment with any listed dermatologist. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Medicare Advantage physician directories for dermatology in many areas substantially overestimate the number of in-network physicians available to treat patients with medical skin conditions. These inaccuracies occurred in areas with long appointment wait times and where plans are terminating selected physician contracts. This suggests a lack of capacity that would be exacerbated by further network narrowing.Accurate physician directories are essential for proper oversight of network adequacy, and for patients who rely on these listings to evaluate health plan options during open enrollment.

摘要

重要性 保险公司越来越多地在新的平价医疗法案州交易所提供的健康计划和医疗保险优势(MA)计划中部署“窄网络”,即与较少的签约医生合作,这些计划是向医疗保险受益人提供的商业替代方案。选择健康计划的患者依赖于保险公司发布的网络目录的准确性。MA 计划必须符合网络充足性要求,而参与医生的目录不准确可能会影响这些决定。

目的 确定最大的 MA 计划目录中参与皮肤科医生的 MA 计划目录的准确性,以及列出的医生的预约可用性。

设计、地点和参与者 拨打脚本电话给 12 个美国大都市地区最大的 MA 计划目录中的每位皮肤科医生。来电者代表他虚构的患有严重瘙痒症的父亲预约,询问皮肤科医生是否接受相关计划,并要求提供下一个可用预约日期。

主要结果和措施 预约可用性和等待时间。

结果 在总共 4754 名医生名单中,45.5%是同一计划目录中的重复项。在剩下的唯一列表中,48.9%的医生可以联系到,接受列出的计划,并为我们虚构的患者提供预约。列出的许多皮肤科医生的联系方式不正确,已去世、退休或已搬迁,不接受新患者,不接受该保险计划,或专门从事亚专科。剩余列表中预约的平均(范围)等待时间为 45.5(1-414)天。网络目录的准确性和预约等待时间因健康计划和大都市地区而异。对于 1 个计划,我们的来电者无法获得任何列出的皮肤科医生的预约。

结论和相关性 在许多地区,医疗保险优势皮肤科医生目录大大高估了可治疗患有医疗皮肤状况的患者的网络内医生数量。这些不准确的情况出现在预约等待时间长且计划正在终止选定医生合同的地区。这表明缺乏能力,而进一步的网络收窄会加剧这种情况。准确的医生目录对于适当监督网络充足性以及依赖这些清单在开放注册期间评估健康计划选择的患者至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验