• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2017年个人市场上的窄网络

Narrow Networks on the Individual Marketplace in 2017.

作者信息

Polski Daniel, Weiner Janet, Zhang Yuehan

机构信息

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

LDI Issue Brief. 2017 Sep;21(8):1-6.

PMID:28958127
Abstract

This Issue Brief describes the breadth of physician networks on the ACA marketplaces in 2017. We find that the overall rate of narrow networks is 21%, which is a decline since 2014 (31%) and 2016 (25%). Narrow networks are concentrated in plans sold on state-based marketplaces, at 42%, compared to 10% of plans on federally-facilitated marketplaces. Issuers that have traditionally offered Medicaid coverage have the highest prevalence of narrow network plans at 36%, with regional/local plans and provider-based plans close behind at 27% and 30%. We also find large differences in narrow networks by state and by plan type.

摘要

本问题简报描述了2017年《平价医疗法案》(ACA)市场上医生网络的广度。我们发现,窄网络的总体比例为21%,与2014年(31%)和2016年(25%)相比有所下降。窄网络集中在基于州的市场上销售的计划中,比例为42%,而在联邦政府协助的市场上销售的计划中这一比例为10%。传统上提供医疗补助覆盖的保险公司,其窄网络计划的比例最高,为36%,地区/本地计划和基于医疗服务提供者的计划紧随其后,分别为27%和30%。我们还发现,不同州和不同计划类型的窄网络存在很大差异。

相似文献

1
Narrow Networks on the Individual Marketplace in 2017.2017年个人市场上的窄网络
LDI Issue Brief. 2017 Sep;21(8):1-6.
2
Behavioral Health Coverage Under the Affordable Care Act: What Can We Learn From Marketplace Products?平价医疗法案下的行为健康保险覆盖范围:我们能从市场产品中学到什么?
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Mar 1;69(3):315-321. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700098. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
3
The Affordable Care Act and Access to Care for People Changing Coverage Sources.《平价医疗法案》与更换医保覆盖来源人群的医疗服务可及性
Am J Public Health. 2015 Nov;105 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S651-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302867. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
4
Exploring the decline of narrow networks on the 2017 ACA marketplaces.探索2017年《平价医疗法案》市场上窄网络的衰落。
LDI Issue Brief. 2017 Nov 1;21(9):1-6.
5
Most Marketplace Plans Included At Least 25 Percent Of Local-Area Physicians, But Enrollment Disparities Remained.大多数市场计划至少包括 25%的当地医生,但入保率仍存在差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1615-1623. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1582.
6
Access to Neurosurgery in the Era of Narrowing Insurance Networks: Statewide Analysis of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Marketplace Plans in Arizona.在保险网络收窄的时代获取神经外科治疗服务:亚利桑那州全州范围内的《患者保护与平价医疗法案》市场计划分析
World Neurosurg. 2021 May;149:e963-e968. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.064. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
7
Marketplace Plans With Narrow Physician Networks Feature Lower Monthly Premiums Than Plans With Larger Networks.与拥有较大医生网络的保险计划相比,拥有狭窄医生网络的市场保险计划月保费更低。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Oct 1;35(10):1842-1848. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0693.
8
State-Based Marketplaces Outperform Federally-Facilitated Marketplaces.基于州的医保市场表现优于联邦政府推动的医保市场。
LDI Issue Brief. 2018 Mar 1;22(1):1-7.
9
Pediatric and Adult Physician Networks in Affordable Care Act Marketplace Plans.平价医疗法案市场计划中的儿科和成人医生网络。
Pediatrics. 2017 Apr;139(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3117. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Why Are the Health Insurance Marketplaces Thriving in Some States but Struggling in Others?为何健康保险市场在一些州蓬勃发展,而在其他州却举步维艰?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2018 Nov 1;2018:1-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Breadth and Exclusivity of Hospital and Physician Networks in US Insurance Markets.美国保险市场中医院和医生网络的广度和独特性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029419. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29419.
2
Comparison of Office-Based Physician Participation in Medicaid Managed Care and Health Insurance Exchange Plans in the Same US Geographic Markets.美国同一地理市场中,以办公室为基础的医生参与医疗补助管理式医疗和健康保险交易所计划的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202727. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2727.
3
Quality Regulation? Access to High-Quality Specialists for Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries in California.
质量监管?加利福尼亚州医疗保险优势受益人的高质量专科医生可及性
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2019 Mar 27;6:2333392818824472. doi: 10.1177/2333392818824472. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.