• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

草原围封八年后,土壤养分增加和光照强度降低导致物种丧失。

Increased soil nutrition and decreased light intensity drive species loss after eight years grassland enclosures.

机构信息

College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China.

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-process and Function Assessment, State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:44525. doi: 10.1038/srep44525.

DOI:10.1038/srep44525
PMID:28344355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5366805/
Abstract

Enclosures (fenced, grazing or clipping) within a certain period of years are the most common tools for restoration of degraded grasslands in temperate regions. Short-term enclosures can improve biodiversity and productivity by effectively relieving grazing pressure, while long-term enclosures can reduce species diversity. We therefore carried out a field experiment to investigate the specific causes of the reduced species diversity in Hulunbeier grassland of northern China. After eight years of enclosure, the significantly increased soil available nitrogen (AN) and available phosphorus (AvP) in enclosure community reduced nitrogen (N) limitation but most vegetation was still N limited. Many environmental factors led to decreased species richness, but increased soil AN and decreased light intensity at the community bottom were the most significant ones. Community density decreased independently of soil nutrition but significantly related to decreased species richness. Density of dominant canopy species increased, while dominant understory species decreased during assemblage-level thinning; therefore, the random-loss hypothesis was not supported. The dominant understory species responded to lower light availability by increasing their height, leaf area, and chlorophyll content. Moreover, our results were expected to provide some specific guidance for the restoration mode selection of degraded grasslands in northern China.

摘要

在温带地区,围封(围栏、放牧或刈割)是恢复退化草地最常用的工具之一。短期围封可以通过有效缓解放牧压力来提高生物多样性和生产力,而长期围封会降低物种多样性。因此,我们进行了一项野外实验,以调查中国北方呼伦贝尔草原物种多样性降低的具体原因。经过八年的围封,围封群落中土壤有效氮(AN)和有效磷(AvP)的显著增加减轻了氮(N)限制,但大多数植被仍受到 N 限制。许多环境因素导致物种丰富度降低,但增加的土壤 AN 和群落底部降低的光强度是最显著的因素。群落密度独立于土壤养分而减少,但与物种丰富度的减少显著相关。优势冠层物种的密度增加,而在组装级别的稀疏化过程中,优势林下物种减少;因此,随机损失假说不成立。林下优势物种通过增加其高度、叶面积和叶绿素含量来应对较低的光照条件。此外,我们的结果有望为中国北方退化草地的恢复模式选择提供一些具体指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b71/5366805/44c1391a7cdd/srep44525-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b71/5366805/babc4335e6dc/srep44525-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b71/5366805/2cbd28a5e414/srep44525-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b71/5366805/f71a3f6d03ce/srep44525-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b71/5366805/44c1391a7cdd/srep44525-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b71/5366805/babc4335e6dc/srep44525-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b71/5366805/2cbd28a5e414/srep44525-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b71/5366805/f71a3f6d03ce/srep44525-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b71/5366805/44c1391a7cdd/srep44525-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Increased soil nutrition and decreased light intensity drive species loss after eight years grassland enclosures.草原围封八年后,土壤养分增加和光照强度降低导致物种丧失。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 27;7:44525. doi: 10.1038/srep44525.
2
Grazing exclusion is more effective for vegetation restoration and nutrient transfer in the heavily degraded desert steppe.放牧禁牧更有利于重度退化荒漠草原植被恢复和养分转移。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 May 17;24(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05127-z.
3
Long-term grazing effects on vegetation characteristics and soil properties in a semiarid grassland, northern China.中国北方半干旱草原长期放牧对植被特征和土壤性质的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 May;189(5):216. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-5947-x. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
4
Soil properties and species composition under different grazing intensity in an alpine meadow on the eastern Tibetan Plateau, China.中国青藏高原东部高寒草甸不同放牧强度下的土壤性质与物种组成
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Dec;188(12):678. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5663-y. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
5
[Characteristics of vegetation, soil, and their coupling of degraded grasslands].退化草原植被、土壤特征及其耦合关系
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2002 Aug;13(8):915-22.
6
[Effects of Grazing on Plant Diversity and Their Carbon Stocks in Different Types of Grasslands].放牧对不同类型草地植物多样性及其碳储量的影响
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Sep 8;45(9):5395-5405. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202309235.
7
[Community structure and diversity of soil arthropods in naturally restored sandy grasslands after grazing].[放牧后自然恢复沙质草原土壤节肢动物的群落结构与多样性]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2010 Nov;21(11):2849-55.
8
Effects of anthropogenic fragmentation on primary productivity and soil carbon storage in temperate mountain grasslands.人为破碎化对温带山地草原初级生产力和土壤碳储量的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Nov;188(11):653. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5667-7. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
9
Changes in nitrogen functional genes in soil profiles of grassland under long-term grazing prohibition in a semiarid area.半干旱地区长期禁牧区草地土壤剖面氮功能基因的变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jul 10;673:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.026. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
10
How Fencing Affects the Soil Quality and Plant Biomass in the Grassland of the Loess Plateau.围栏如何影响黄土高原草地的土壤质量和植物生物量
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 25;14(10):1117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101117.

引用本文的文献

1
Soil function, properties and plant diversity-biomass patterns differ between grazed and non-grazed steppe ecosystems.放牧和未放牧的草原生态系统在土壤功能、特性以及植物多样性-生物量模式方面存在差异。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jul 8;16:1597590. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1597590. eCollection 2025.
2
Plant community restoration time is a key factor affecting plant nutrient and species richness.植物群落恢复时间是影响植物养分和物种丰富度的关键因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00326-6.
3
Habitat modifies the relationship between grass and herbivore species richness in a South African savanna.

本文引用的文献

1
Warming increases plant biomass and reduces diversity across continents, latitudes, and species migration scenarios in experimental wetland communities.变暖会增加大陆、纬度和物种迁徙情景下湿地实验群落中的植物生物量,并降低其多样性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Mar;20(3):835-50. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12378. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
2
Testing mechanisms of N-enrichment-induced species loss in a semiarid Inner Mongolia grassland: critical thresholds and implications for long-term ecosystem responses.N 富集诱导半干旱内蒙古草原物种丧失的机制测试:关键阈值及其对长期生态系统响应的意义。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 19;367(1606):3125-34. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0352.
3
栖息地改变了南非稀树草原上草本植物与食草动物物种丰富度之间的关系。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Apr 15;14(4):e11167. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11167. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Changes in Competitors, Stress Tolerators, and Ruderals (CSR) Ecological Strategies after the Introduction of Shrubs and Trees in Disturbed Semiarid Steppe Grasslands in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia.内蒙古呼伦贝尔受干扰半干旱草原引入灌木和乔木后竞争者、胁迫耐受者和杂草型植物(CSR)生态策略的变化
Biology (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;12(12):1479. doi: 10.3390/biology12121479.
5
From nutrients to competition processes: Habitat specific threats to Arnica montana L. populations in Hesse, Germany.从营养物质到竞争过程:德国黑森州对毛莲菜属植物种群的栖息地特异性威胁。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233709. eCollection 2020.
6
Community assembly mechanisms and succession processes significantly differ among treatments during the restoration of Stipa grandis - Leymus chinensis communities.在大针茅-赖草群落恢复过程中,不同处理之间的群落组装机制和演替过程有显著差异。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 8;9(1):16289. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52734-0.
7
The influence of urban stress factors on responses of ground cover vegetation.城市压力因素对地表植被响应的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Dec;25(36):36194-36206. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3437-5. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.
生物多样性丧失及其对人类的影响。
Nature. 2012 Jun 6;486(7401):59-67. doi: 10.1038/nature11148.
4
Fertilization decreases plant biodiversity even when light is not limiting.受精会降低植物生物多样性,即使在光照不充足的情况下也是如此。
Ecol Lett. 2011 Apr;14(4):380-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01599.x. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
5
Rapid top-down regulation of plant C:N:P stoichiometry by grasshoppers in an Inner Mongolia grassland ecosystem.草原生态系统中蝗虫对植物 C:N:P 化学计量比的快速自上而下调控
Oecologia. 2011 May;166(1):253-64. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-1904-5. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
6
Rangeland degradation in North China: perceptions of pastoralists.中国北方草原退化:牧民的看法。
Environ Res. 2010 Apr;110(3):302-7. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.12.007. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
7
Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication.富营养化后,对光照的竞争导致植物生物多样性丧失。
Science. 2009 May 1;324(5927):636-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1169640.
8
Loss of plant species after chronic low-level nitrogen deposition to prairie grasslands.长期低水平氮沉降对草原草地造成植物物种丧失。
Nature. 2008 Feb 7;451(7179):712-5. doi: 10.1038/nature06503.
9
Contrasting plant productivity-diversity relationships across latitude: the role of evolutionary history.对比不同纬度的植物生产力与多样性关系:进化历史的作用。
Ecology. 2007 May;88(5):1091-7. doi: 10.1890/06-0997.
10
The effects of long-term grazing exclosures on range plants in the Central Anatolian Region of Turkey.长期禁牧对土耳其安纳托利亚中部地区牧场植物的影响。
Environ Manage. 2007 Mar;39(3):326-37. doi: 10.1007/s00267-005-0392-y. Epub 2007 Jan 2.