Suppr超能文献

巨大卵巢肿瘤单孔腹腔镜手术技术:SW Kim技术及与开腹手术的比较

Surgical technique for single-port laparoscopy in huge ovarian tumors: SW Kim's technique and comparison to laparotomy.

作者信息

Kim Jeong Sook, Lee In Ok, Eoh Kyung Jin, Chung Young Shin, Lee Inha, Lee Jung-Yun, Nam Eun Ji, Kim Sunghoon, Kim Young Tae, Kim Sang Wun

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017 Mar;60(2):178-186. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.2.178. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to introduce a method to remove huge ovarian tumors (≥15 cm) intact with single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) using SW Kim's technique and to compare the surgical outcomes with those of laparotomy.

METHODS

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent either SPLS (n=21) with SW Kim's technique using a specially designed 30×30-cm-sized 3XL LapBag or laparotomy (n=22) for a huge ovarian tumor from December 2008 to May 2016. Perioperative surgical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In 19/21 (90.5%) patients, SPLS was successfully performed without any tumor spillage or conversion to multi-port laparoscopy or laparotomy. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics, including tumor diameter and total operation time, between both groups. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for the SPLS group than for the laparotomy group (median, 2 [1 to 5] vs. 4 [3 to 17] days; <0.001). The number of postoperative general diet build-up days was also significantly shorter for the SPLS group (median, 1 [1 to 4] vs. 3 [2 to 16] days; <0.001). Immediate post-operative pain score was lower in the SPLS group (median, 2.0 [0 to 8] vs. 4.0 [0 to 8]; =0.045). Patient-controlled anesthesia was used less in the SPLS group (61.9% vs. 100%).

CONCLUSION

SPLS was successful in removing most large ovarian tumors without rupture and showed quicker recovery and less immediate post-operative pain in comparison to laparotomy. SPLS using SW Kim's technique could be a feasible solution to removing huge ovarian tumors.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在介绍一种使用SW Kim技术通过单孔腹腔镜手术(SPLS)完整切除巨大卵巢肿瘤(≥15 cm)的方法,并将手术结果与开腹手术进行比较。

方法

回顾性分析2008年12月至2016年5月期间因巨大卵巢肿瘤接受使用特制30×30 cm大小的3XL LapBag的SW Kim技术的SPLS(n = 21)或开腹手术(n = 22)的患者的病历。比较围手术期手术结果。

结果

19/21(90.5%)例患者成功进行了SPLS,无肿瘤破裂,未转为多孔腹腔镜手术或开腹手术。两组患者的特征,包括肿瘤直径和总手术时间,无显著差异。SPLS组术后住院时间明显短于开腹手术组(中位数,2 [1至5]天对4 [3至17]天;<0.001)。SPLS组术后恢复正常饮食的天数也明显较短(中位数,1 [1至4]天对3 [2至16]天;<0.001)。SPLS组术后即刻疼痛评分较低(中位数,2.0 [0至8]对4.0 [0至8];=0.045)。SPLS组使用患者自控镇痛的比例较低(61.9%对100%)。

结论

SPLS成功切除了大多数大型卵巢肿瘤且未破裂,与开腹手术相比,恢复更快,术后即刻疼痛更少。使用SW Kim技术的SPLS可能是切除巨大卵巢肿瘤的可行方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea3/5364100/96ad706ff363/ogs-60-178-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验