Suppr超能文献

比较单孔腹腔镜、三孔腹腔镜和传统开腹手术切除大于 15cm 的巨大卵巢囊肿的围手术期结局。

Comparison of perioperative outcomes of single-port laparoscopy, three-port laparoscopy and conventional laparotomy in removing giant ovarian cysts larger than 15 cm.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No.36 Sanhao Street, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01205-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although conventional laparoscopy has gradually accepted as a surgical treatment for ovarian cancer, reducing the port numbers of laparoscopy still has great challenge for larger ovarian tumors. Thus, this study aims to explore the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopy for removing giant ovarian cysts (≥ 15 cm) and compare with laparotomy and three-port laparoscopy.

METHODS

This study enrolled 95 patients with giant ovarian cysts (> 15 cm) who underwent single-port laparoscopy, three-port laparoscopy or laparotomy. Their medical records, perioperative surgical outcomes, and postoperative pain score and complications were analyzed and compared retrospectively.

RESULTS

Single-port laparoscopy showed better perioperative outcomes and less postoperative pain than three-port laparoscopy and laparotomy. The time between post-surgery and getting out of bed in single-port laparoscopy was significant shorter than that in the laparotomy and three-port laparoscopy (17.53 ± 7.26 vs 29.40 ± 9.57 vs 24.56 ± 7.76, P < 0.01). The length of hospital stay in single-port laparoscopy was significantly shorter than that in other two groups (4.06 ± 0.5 vs 5.46 ± 1.63 vs 4.81 ± 0.83, P < 0.001). In addition, single-port laparoscopy had the lowest postoperative pain scores than in the laparotomy and three-port laparoscopy. There were no significant differences of total hospital cost, postoperative complications and time until gas passing among the three surgical groups. Importantly, in the removal of giant ovarian cysts, the proportion of cyst rupture in single-port laparoscopy was far lower than that in three-port laparoscopy (3.0 vs 22.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

For giant ovarian cysts, single-port laparoscopy is still a safe and efficient technique with the advantages of short operation time, less estimated blood loss, short hospital stay, lower spillage rate, and less postoperative pain.

摘要

背景

尽管传统腹腔镜已逐渐被接受为卵巢癌的手术治疗方法,但对于较大的卵巢肿瘤,减少腹腔镜的端口数量仍然具有很大的挑战。因此,本研究旨在探讨单孔腹腔镜切除巨大卵巢囊肿(≥15cm)的手术效果,并与开腹手术和三孔腹腔镜进行比较。

方法

本研究纳入了 95 例巨大卵巢囊肿(>15cm)患者,分别接受单孔腹腔镜、三孔腹腔镜或开腹手术。回顾性分析比较了他们的病历、围手术期手术结果以及术后疼痛评分和并发症。

结果

单孔腹腔镜在围手术期结果和术后疼痛方面优于三孔腹腔镜和开腹手术。单孔腹腔镜术后下床时间明显短于开腹手术和三孔腹腔镜(17.53±7.26 vs 29.40±9.57 vs 24.56±7.76,P<0.01)。单孔腹腔镜的住院时间明显短于其他两组(4.06±0.5 vs 5.46±1.63 vs 4.81±0.83,P<0.001)。此外,单孔腹腔镜的术后疼痛评分明显低于开腹手术和三孔腹腔镜。三组手术的总住院费用、术后并发症和排气时间无显著差异。重要的是,在切除巨大卵巢囊肿方面,单孔腹腔镜的囊肿破裂比例明显低于三孔腹腔镜(3.0% vs 22.2%)。

结论

对于巨大的卵巢囊肿,单孔腹腔镜仍然是一种安全有效的技术,具有手术时间短、失血量少、住院时间短、溢出率低、术后疼痛轻的优点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34dc/8061010/7970a7a427a4/12893_2021_1205_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验