• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门冬胰岛素与基础胰岛素联用显著改善 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:一项为期 18 周、随机、开放标签、3 期临床试验(起始 3)。

Adding fast-acting insulin aspart to basal insulin significantly improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, 18-week, open-label, phase 3 trial (onset 3).

机构信息

Endocrine and Metabolic Consultants, Rockville, Maryland.

University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Oct;19(10):1389-1396. doi: 10.1111/dom.12955. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1111/dom.12955
PMID:28345792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5637905/
Abstract

AIM

To confirm glycaemic control superiority of mealtime fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) in a basal-bolus (BB) regimen vs basal-only insulin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, 18-week trial (51 sites; 6 countries), adults (n = 236) with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D; mean glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1c] ± SD: 7.9% ± 0.7% [63.1 ± 7.5 mmol/mol]) receiving basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs underwent 8-week optimization of prior once-daily basal insulin followed by randomization 1:1 to either a BB regimen with faster aspart (n = 116) or continuation of once-daily basal insulin (n = 120), both with metformin. Primary endpoint was HbA1c change from baseline after 18 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included: postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) change and overall PPG increment (all meals); weight; treatment-emergent adverse events; hypoglycaemic episodes.

RESULTS

HbA1c decreased from 7.9% (63.2 mmol/mol) to 6.8% (50.7 mmol/mol; BB group) and from 7.9% (63.2 mmol/mol) to 7.7% (60.7 mmol/mol; basal-only group); estimated treatment difference [95% confidence interval] -0.94% [-1.17; -0.72]; -10.3 mmol/mol [-12.8; -7.8]; P  < .0001. Reductions from baseline in overall mean 2-hour PPG and overall PPG increment for all meals (self-measured plasma glucose profiles) were statistically significant in favour of BB treatment ( P  < .0001). Severe/blood glucose confirmed hypoglycaemia rate (12.8 vs 2.0 episodes per patient-years of exposure), total daily insulin (1.2 vs 0.6 U/kg) and weight gain (1.8 vs 0.2 kg) were greater with BB than with basal-only treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In T2D, faster aspart in a BB regimen provided superior glycaemic control as compared with basal-only insulin, but with an increase in the frequency of hypoglycaemia and modest weight gain.

摘要

目的

确认餐时速效胰岛素门冬胰岛素(速秀霖)在基础-餐时胰岛素方案(BB 方案)中的血糖控制优于仅基础胰岛素。

材料和方法

这是一项开放标签、随机、18 周的试验(51 个研究中心;6 个国家),纳入了血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病(T2D;平均糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]±SD:7.9%±0.7%[63.1±7.5mmol/mol])成年患者(n=236),他们正在接受基础胰岛素和口服降糖药物治疗。这些患者先进行 8 周的优化治疗,以调整每日一次的基础胰岛素剂量,然后以 1:1 的比例随机分配至接受 BB 方案(n=116)或继续接受每日一次的基础胰岛素(n=120)治疗,两种方案均加用二甲双胍。主要终点为治疗 18 周后 HbA1c 较基线的变化。次要终点包括:餐后血糖(PPG)变化和所有进餐的总体 PPG 增量;体重;治疗期间出现的不良事件;低血糖发作。

结果

HbA1c 从 7.9%(63.2mmol/mol)降至 6.8%(50.7mmol/mol;BB 组)和 7.9%(63.2mmol/mol)降至 7.7%(60.7mmol/mol;仅基础胰岛素组);估计治疗差异[95%置信区间]为-0.94%[-1.17;-0.72];-10.3mmol/mol[-12.8;-7.8];P<0.0001。所有进餐的总体 2 小时 PPG 及总体 PPG 增量自基线的降低在 BB 治疗中具有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。与仅基础胰岛素相比,BB 治疗低血糖(严重/经证实的低血糖发作率:12.8 比 2.0 例/患者-年)、总日胰岛素剂量(1.2 比 0.6U/kg)和体重增加(1.8 比 0.2kg)更为常见。

结论

在 T2D 中,与仅基础胰岛素相比,速秀霖联合 BB 方案可提供更优的血糖控制,但低血糖发作频率增加,体重增加适度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/614a/5637905/e2cae98d40b6/DOM-19-1389-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/614a/5637905/d084ab50a1d3/DOM-19-1389-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/614a/5637905/66f52e6298fb/DOM-19-1389-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/614a/5637905/e2cae98d40b6/DOM-19-1389-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/614a/5637905/d084ab50a1d3/DOM-19-1389-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/614a/5637905/66f52e6298fb/DOM-19-1389-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/614a/5637905/e2cae98d40b6/DOM-19-1389-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Adding fast-acting insulin aspart to basal insulin significantly improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, 18-week, open-label, phase 3 trial (onset 3).门冬胰岛素与基础胰岛素联用显著改善 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:一项为期 18 周、随机、开放标签、3 期临床试验(起始 3)。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Oct;19(10):1389-1396. doi: 10.1111/dom.12955. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
2
Efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart in comparison with insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes (onset 1): A 52-week, randomized, treat-to-target, phase III trial.速效门冬胰岛素与门冬胰岛素治疗 1 型糖尿病(发病 1)的疗效和安全性比较:一项 52 周、随机、靶向治疗、III 期临床试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 May;20(5):1148-1155. doi: 10.1111/dom.13205. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
3
Treatment intensification with an insulin degludec (IDeg)/insulin aspart (IAsp) co-formulation twice daily compared with basal IDeg and prandial IAsp in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled phase III trial.与基础胰岛素德谷胰岛素(IDeg)和餐时胰岛素门冬胰岛素(IAsp)相比,每日两次使用德谷胰岛素(IDeg)/门冬胰岛素(IAsp)共混制剂强化治疗2型糖尿病:一项随机对照III期试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Mar;18(3):274-80. doi: 10.1111/dom.12609. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
4
Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec given as part of basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes: a 26-week randomized, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial.德谷胰岛素作为基础-餐时治疗的一部分与门冬胰岛素联用治疗1型糖尿病的疗效和安全性:一项为期26周的随机、开放标签、达标治疗的非劣效性试验
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Oct;16(10):922-30. doi: 10.1111/dom.12298. Epub 2014 May 8.
5
A Randomized Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Compared With Insulin Aspart, Both in Combination With Insulin Degludec With or Without Metformin, in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (ONSET 9).一项评估速效门冬胰岛素与门冬胰岛素联合或不联合二甲双胍与地特胰岛素治疗成人 2 型糖尿病的疗效和安全性的随机试验(ONSET 9)。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1710-1716. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2232. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
6
Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Improves Glycemic Control in Basal-Bolus Treatment for Type 1 Diabetes: Results of a 26-Week Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Treat-to-Target, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial (onset 1).门冬胰岛素快速起效制剂在基础-餐时胰岛素方案治疗 1 型糖尿病中的疗效:一项为期 26 周、多中心、活性对照、目标导向、随机、平行分组试验(起始 1)的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):943-950. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1771. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
7
Faster Aspart Versus Insulin Aspart as Part of a Basal-Bolus Regimen in Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: The onset 2 Trial.预混胰岛素类似物转换治疗对控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效:ONSET 2 研究。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):951-957. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1770. Epub 2017 May 8.
8
Safety and efficacy of insulin degludec/insulin aspart with bolus mealtime insulin aspart compared with standard basal-bolus treatment in people with Type 1 diabetes: 1-year results from a randomized clinical trial (BOOST T1).德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素与餐时大剂量门冬胰岛素联合使用相较于标准基础-餐时胰岛素治疗方案在1型糖尿病患者中的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验(BOOST T1)的1年结果
Diabet Med. 2017 Feb;34(2):167-173. doi: 10.1111/dme.13068. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
9
Mealtime fast-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart for controlling postprandial hyperglycaemia in people with insulin-resistant Type 2 diabetes.门冬胰岛素与门冬胰岛素类似物治疗胰岛素抵抗 2 型糖尿病患者餐后高血糖的疗效比较。
Diabet Med. 2019 Jun;36(6):771-775. doi: 10.1111/dme.13866. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A phase III, open-label, 2:1 randomized, treat-to-target trial.中文 2 型糖尿病患者中德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素与精蛋白锌重组赖脯胰岛素 30 疗效和安全性的比较:一项 III 期、开放标签、2:1 随机、目标导向治疗的试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1652-1660. doi: 10.1111/dom.13703. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Ultra-Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogs in Diabetes: An Expert Consensus.超短效胰岛素类似物在糖尿病治疗中的作用:专家共识
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Mar;19(2):452-469. doi: 10.1177/19322968231204584. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
2
Expert Group Recommendations on the Effective Use of Bolus Insulin in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.专家组关于 2 型糖尿病管理中有效使用胰岛素冲击疗法的建议。
Med Sci (Basel). 2021 May 28;9(2):38. doi: 10.3390/medsci9020038.
3
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Three Different Formulations of Insulin Aspart: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study in Men With Type 1 Diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Improves Glycemic Control in Basal-Bolus Treatment for Type 1 Diabetes: Results of a 26-Week Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Treat-to-Target, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial (onset 1).门冬胰岛素快速起效制剂在基础-餐时胰岛素方案治疗 1 型糖尿病中的疗效:一项为期 26 周、多中心、活性对照、目标导向、随机、平行分组试验(起始 1)的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):943-950. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1771. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
2
A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Pharmacology Trials Investigating the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.一项关于速效胰岛素门冬氨酸在1型糖尿病成人患者中药代动力学和药效学特征的临床药理学试验的汇总分析。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 May;56(5):551-559. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0514-8.
3
胰岛素门冬的三种不同制剂的药代动力学和药效学:1 型糖尿病男性的随机、双盲、交叉研究。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Feb;44(2):448-455. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1017. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
4
The continuing quest for better subcutaneously administered prandial insulins: a review of recent developments and potential clinical implications.不断探索更好的皮下注射餐时胰岛素:综述近期进展及潜在临床意义。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 May;22(5):743-754. doi: 10.1111/dom.13963. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
5
Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart: A Review of its Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties and the Clinical Consequences.门冬胰岛素速效:药代动力学和药效学特性及临床后果的综述。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Feb;59(2):155-172. doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00834-5.
6
Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart: The Rationale for a New Mealtime Insulin.门冬胰岛素:新型餐时胰岛素的应用依据
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Oct;10(5):1793-1800. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00685-0. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
7
Fast-acting insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Earlier onset and greater initial exposure and glucose-lowering effect compared with insulin aspart.速效门冬胰岛素在 2 型糖尿病患者中的应用:与门冬胰岛素相比,起效更快,初始暴露量更大,降糖效果更强。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Sep;21(9):2068-2075. doi: 10.1111/dom.13767. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Baseline nocturnal glucose change: A predictor of the treatment effect of bolus intensification in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.基础夜间血糖变化:预测胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病患者强化餐时胰岛素治疗效果的指标。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1752-1756. doi: 10.1111/dom.13729. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
9
Investigating the Association Between Baseline Characteristics (HbA1c and Body Mass Index) and Clinical Outcomes of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in People with Diabetes: A Post Hoc Analysis.探讨糖尿病患者基线特征(糖化血红蛋白和体重指数)与门冬胰岛素快速起效临床结局之间的关联:一项事后分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Feb;10(1):177-188. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0553-7. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
10
Fast-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart in the setting of insulin degludec-treated type 1 diabetes: Efficacy and safety from a randomized double-blind trial.门冬胰岛素速效对比地特胰岛素在胰岛素德谷胰岛素治疗 1 型糖尿病中的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲试验的结果。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Dec;20(12):2885-2893. doi: 10.1111/dom.13545. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
Clinical inertia with regard to intensifying therapy in people with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin.在接受基础胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,强化治疗方面的临床惰性。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Apr;18(4):401-9. doi: 10.1111/dom.12626. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
4
Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2016: Summary of Revisions.《2016年糖尿病医疗护理标准:修订摘要》
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S4-5. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S003.
5
Correlation of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose with HbA1c in assessing glycemic control; systematic review and meta-analysis.空腹及餐后血糖与糖化血红蛋白在评估血糖控制中的相关性:系统评价与Meta分析
Arch Public Health. 2015 Sep 25;73:43. doi: 10.1186/s13690-015-0088-6. eCollection 2015.
6
Intensification of insulin therapy with basal-bolus or premixed insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.2型糖尿病中基础-餐时胰岛素方案或预混胰岛素方案强化胰岛素治疗:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Endocrine. 2016 Mar;51(3):417-28. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0718-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
7
Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.2015年2型糖尿病高血糖管理:以患者为中心的方法:美国糖尿病协会和欧洲糖尿病研究协会立场声明更新版
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38(1):140-9. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2441.
8
Rationale for and design of the Acarbose Cardiovascular Evaluation (ACE) trial.阿卡波糖心血管评估(ACE)试验的原理与设计
Am Heart J. 2014 Jul;168(1):23-9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
9
AUTONOMY: the first randomized trial comparing two patient-driven approaches to initiate and titrate prandial insulin lispro in type 2 diabetes.自主模式:比较两种患者驱动的起始和滴定餐时胰岛素赖脯氨酸方法的首个随机试验,用于 2 型糖尿病患者。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Aug;37(8):2132-40. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2664. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
10
Switching to multiple daily injection therapy with glulisine improves glycaemic control, vascular damage and treatment satisfaction in basal insulin glargine-injected diabetic patients.改用门冬胰岛素多次皮下注射治疗可改善基础胰岛素甘精胰岛素注射的糖尿病患者的血糖控制、血管损伤和治疗满意度。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014 Nov;30(8):693-700. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2537.