Suppr超能文献

门冬胰岛素与基础胰岛素联用显著改善 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:一项为期 18 周、随机、开放标签、3 期临床试验(起始 3)。

Adding fast-acting insulin aspart to basal insulin significantly improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, 18-week, open-label, phase 3 trial (onset 3).

机构信息

Endocrine and Metabolic Consultants, Rockville, Maryland.

University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Oct;19(10):1389-1396. doi: 10.1111/dom.12955. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

Abstract

AIM

To confirm glycaemic control superiority of mealtime fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) in a basal-bolus (BB) regimen vs basal-only insulin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this open-label, randomized, 18-week trial (51 sites; 6 countries), adults (n = 236) with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D; mean glycosylated haemoglobin [HbA1c] ± SD: 7.9% ± 0.7% [63.1 ± 7.5 mmol/mol]) receiving basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs underwent 8-week optimization of prior once-daily basal insulin followed by randomization 1:1 to either a BB regimen with faster aspart (n = 116) or continuation of once-daily basal insulin (n = 120), both with metformin. Primary endpoint was HbA1c change from baseline after 18 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included: postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) change and overall PPG increment (all meals); weight; treatment-emergent adverse events; hypoglycaemic episodes.

RESULTS

HbA1c decreased from 7.9% (63.2 mmol/mol) to 6.8% (50.7 mmol/mol; BB group) and from 7.9% (63.2 mmol/mol) to 7.7% (60.7 mmol/mol; basal-only group); estimated treatment difference [95% confidence interval] -0.94% [-1.17; -0.72]; -10.3 mmol/mol [-12.8; -7.8]; P  < .0001. Reductions from baseline in overall mean 2-hour PPG and overall PPG increment for all meals (self-measured plasma glucose profiles) were statistically significant in favour of BB treatment ( P  < .0001). Severe/blood glucose confirmed hypoglycaemia rate (12.8 vs 2.0 episodes per patient-years of exposure), total daily insulin (1.2 vs 0.6 U/kg) and weight gain (1.8 vs 0.2 kg) were greater with BB than with basal-only treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In T2D, faster aspart in a BB regimen provided superior glycaemic control as compared with basal-only insulin, but with an increase in the frequency of hypoglycaemia and modest weight gain.

摘要

目的

确认餐时速效胰岛素门冬胰岛素(速秀霖)在基础-餐时胰岛素方案(BB 方案)中的血糖控制优于仅基础胰岛素。

材料和方法

这是一项开放标签、随机、18 周的试验(51 个研究中心;6 个国家),纳入了血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病(T2D;平均糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]±SD:7.9%±0.7%[63.1±7.5mmol/mol])成年患者(n=236),他们正在接受基础胰岛素和口服降糖药物治疗。这些患者先进行 8 周的优化治疗,以调整每日一次的基础胰岛素剂量,然后以 1:1 的比例随机分配至接受 BB 方案(n=116)或继续接受每日一次的基础胰岛素(n=120)治疗,两种方案均加用二甲双胍。主要终点为治疗 18 周后 HbA1c 较基线的变化。次要终点包括:餐后血糖(PPG)变化和所有进餐的总体 PPG 增量;体重;治疗期间出现的不良事件;低血糖发作。

结果

HbA1c 从 7.9%(63.2mmol/mol)降至 6.8%(50.7mmol/mol;BB 组)和 7.9%(63.2mmol/mol)降至 7.7%(60.7mmol/mol;仅基础胰岛素组);估计治疗差异[95%置信区间]为-0.94%[-1.17;-0.72];-10.3mmol/mol[-12.8;-7.8];P<0.0001。所有进餐的总体 2 小时 PPG 及总体 PPG 增量自基线的降低在 BB 治疗中具有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。与仅基础胰岛素相比,BB 治疗低血糖(严重/经证实的低血糖发作率:12.8 比 2.0 例/患者-年)、总日胰岛素剂量(1.2 比 0.6U/kg)和体重增加(1.8 比 0.2kg)更为常见。

结论

在 T2D 中,与仅基础胰岛素相比,速秀霖联合 BB 方案可提供更优的血糖控制,但低血糖发作频率增加,体重增加适度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/614a/5637905/d084ab50a1d3/DOM-19-1389-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验