• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

营造一种促进英国医疗保健创新的氛围——借鉴国际创新者的经验教训。

Creating a climate that catalyses healthcare innovation in the United Kingdom - learning lessons from international innovators.

作者信息

Cresswell Kathrin, Cunningham-Burley Sarah, Sheikh Aziz

机构信息

Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh.

.

出版信息

J Innov Health Inform. 2017 Jan 25;23(4):882. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i4.882.

DOI:10.14236/jhi.v23i4.882
PMID:28346133
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The United Kingdom (UK) lags behind other high-income countries in relation to technological innovation in healthcare. In order to inform UK strategy on how to catalyse innovation, we sought to understand what national strategies can help to promote a climate for innovation in healthcare settings by extracting lessons for the UK from international innovators.

METHODS

We undertook a series of qualitative semi-structured interviews with senior international innovators from a range of health related policy, care/service delivery, commercial and academic backgrounds. Thematic analysis helped to explore how different stakeholder groups could facilitate/inhibit innovation at individual, organisational, and wider societal levels.

RESULTS

We conducted 14 interviews and found that a conducive climate for healthcare innovation comprised of national/regional strategies stimulating commercial competition, promoting public/private relationships, and providing central direction (e.g. incentives for adoption and regulation through standards) without being restrictive. Organisational attitudes with a willingness to experiment and to take risks were also seen as important, but a bottom-up approach to innovation, based on the identification of clinical need, was seen as a crucial first step to construct relevant national policies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is now a need to create mechanisms through which frontline National Health Service staff in relation can raise ideas/concerns and suggest opportunities for improvement, and then build national innovation environments that seek to address these needs. This should be accompanied by creating competitive health technology markets to stimulate a commercial environment that attracts high-quality health information technology experts and innovators working in partnership with staff and patients.

摘要

背景

在医疗保健技术创新方面,英国落后于其他高收入国家。为了为英国制定促进创新的战略提供参考,我们试图通过借鉴国际创新者的经验教训,了解哪些国家战略有助于营造医疗保健领域的创新氛围。

方法

我们对一系列来自与健康相关的政策、护理/服务提供、商业和学术背景的资深国际创新者进行了一系列定性半结构化访谈。主题分析有助于探讨不同利益相关者群体如何在个人、组织和更广泛的社会层面促进/抑制创新。

结果

我们进行了14次访谈,发现有利于医疗保健创新的氛围包括国家/地区战略,这些战略刺激商业竞争、促进公私关系,并提供核心指导(例如通过标准进行采用激励和监管),同时又不过于严格。愿意尝试和冒险的组织态度也被视为很重要,但基于确定临床需求的自下而上的创新方法被视为构建相关国家政策的关键第一步。

结论

现在需要建立机制,让一线国民保健服务人员能够提出想法/担忧,并提出改进机会,然后构建旨在满足这些需求的国家创新环境。与此同时,应创建具有竞争力的健康技术市场,以刺激商业环境,吸引与工作人员和患者合作的高质量健康信息技术专家和创新者。

相似文献

1
Creating a climate that catalyses healthcare innovation in the United Kingdom - learning lessons from international innovators.营造一种促进英国医疗保健创新的氛围——借鉴国际创新者的经验教训。
J Innov Health Inform. 2017 Jan 25;23(4):882. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i4.882.
2
Understanding innovators' experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study.理解医疗服务创新在实施和推广过程中创新者所面临的障碍和促进因素的经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec 16;11:342. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-342.
3
When the user is not the chooser: learning from stakeholder involvement in technology adoption decisions in infection control.当用户不是决策者时:从利益相关者参与感染控制技术采用决策中学习。
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Jul;81(3):163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.04.014. Epub 2012 May 24.
4
Opportunities and practices supporting responsive health care for forced migrants: lessons from transnational practice and a mixed-methods systematic review.支持为被迫移民提供响应式医疗服务的机遇与实践:跨国实践经验及混合方法系统评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(13):1-182. doi: 10.3310/MRWK3419.
5
Making sense of evidence in management decisions: the role of research-based knowledge on innovation adoption and implementation in healthcare. study protocol.在管理决策中理解证据:基于研究的知识在医疗保健中的创新采用和实施的作用。研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 21;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-22.
6
How is success achieved by individuals innovating for patient safety and quality in the NHS?在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中,个人如何通过为患者安全和质量进行创新来取得成功?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 11;17(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2589-1.
7
Accelerating Innovation in Health Care: Insights From a Qualitative Inquiry Into United Kingdom and United States Innovation Centers.加速医疗创新:来自英国和美国创新中心的定性研究洞察。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 25;22(9):e19644. doi: 10.2196/19644.
8
Implementing an artificial intelligence command centre in the NHS: a mixed-methods study.在英国国家医疗服务体系中实施人工智能指挥中心:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Oct;12(41):1-108. doi: 10.3310/TATM3277.
9
Co-designing and testing the learn together guidance to support patient and family involvement in patient safety investigations: a mixed-methods study.共同设计并测试“共同学习指南”以支持患者及家属参与患者安全调查:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(18):1-125. doi: 10.3310/KJHT3375.
10
Legal and Regulatory Barriers to Reverse Innovation.法律和监管对反向创新的阻碍。
Ann Glob Health. 2016 Nov-Dec;82(6):991-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.10.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Tensions into a Novel Conceptual Model for Telehealth Advancement in Healthcare Organizations.将实施研究综合框架(CFIR)与各种矛盾因素整合到一个用于医疗机构远程医疗发展的新型概念模型中。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Nov 29;16:501-510. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S497875. eCollection 2024.
2
Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review.医疗机构员工驱动的创新:系统评价的启示。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6734. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6734. Epub 2023 May 15.
3
Investigating divergent thinking and creative ability in surgeons (IDEAS): a survey protocol.
调查外科医生的发散思维和创造力(IDEAS):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 11;13(4):e069873. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069873.
4
What can healthcare systems learn from looking at tensions in innovation processes? A systematic literature review.从创新过程中的紧张关系中,医疗保健系统可以学到什么?一项系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 28;22(1):1299. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08626-7.
5
Creativity in Nursing Care: A Concept Analysis.护理中的创造力:概念分析
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2021 Oct;29(3):389-396. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2021.21027.
6
Aiming for quality: a global compass for national learning systems.追求质量:国家学习体系的全球指南。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Jul 19;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00746-6.
7
Accelerating Innovation in Health Care: Insights From a Qualitative Inquiry Into United Kingdom and United States Innovation Centers.加速医疗创新:来自英国和美国创新中心的定性研究洞察。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 25;22(9):e19644. doi: 10.2196/19644.
8
Reshaping public hospitals: an agenda for reform in Asia and the Pacific.重塑公立医院:亚太地区改革议程
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Nov 28;3(6):e001168. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001168. eCollection 2018.