Schweidenback Jordan Scott, Rangachari Pavani, D'Amato-Palumbo Sandra, Gladstone Joseph Scott
Department of Population Health and Leadership, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Allied Health, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT, USA.
J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Nov 29;16:501-510. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S497875. eCollection 2024.
Telehealth services have potential to enhance access to quality healthcare, reduce costs, and increase satisfaction for both patients and providers. As a disruptive healthcare innovation, telehealth disorders old systems and creates a new hybrid model of care that delivers significant value to stakeholders. However, the failure rate of innovation implementation in healthcare ranges from 30% to 90%, depending on the complexity involved. While researchers have conducted extensive studies on the barriers and facilitators to widespread innovation implementation, the root causes of innovation implementation failure in health services (eg, telehealth implementation failure) are not fully understood. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) introduced in 2009 has become increasingly popular as a framework for informing successful innovation implementation in health services. The CFIR identifies barriers and facilitators to innovation implementation across five domains of implementation-the innovation, individual, inner, outer, and process domains. However, it lacks a mechanism to capture the complex social challenges (tensions) underlying the barriers and facilitators that affect implementation success or failure. The Tensions framework supplies a foundation beyond barriers and facilitators to provide a dynamic understanding of the role of social conflicts impacting the implementation process. This paper presents a novel conceptual model, (), which integrates tensions and management strategies within the CFIR framework. A key contribution of TIIPS is its ability to visualize the social conflicts within and across implementation domains, offering a clearer understanding of the challenges and opportunities involved in innovation implementation. We apply TIIPs to telehealth implementation, drawing implications for practice, policy, and research to enable successful telehealth implementation in healthcare organizations. This approach advances existing frameworks, aligning with the systems thinking essential for today's healthcare leadership.
远程医疗服务有潜力提高获得优质医疗保健的机会、降低成本,并提高患者和提供者的满意度。作为一种颠覆性的医疗创新,远程医疗打破了旧系统,创造了一种新的混合护理模式,为利益相关者带来了巨大价值。然而,医疗保健领域创新实施的失败率在30%至90%之间,具体取决于所涉及的复杂性。虽然研究人员对广泛创新实施的障碍和促进因素进行了广泛研究,但卫生服务中创新实施失败的根本原因(如远程医疗实施失败)尚未完全了解。2009年引入的实施研究综合框架(CFIR)作为指导卫生服务成功创新实施的框架越来越受欢迎。CFIR在实施的五个领域——创新、个体、内部、外部和过程领域——确定了创新实施的障碍和促进因素。然而,它缺乏一种机制来捕捉影响实施成败的障碍和促进因素背后的复杂社会挑战(紧张关系)。紧张关系框架提供了一个超越障碍和促进因素的基础,以便动态理解影响实施过程的社会冲突的作用。本文提出了一个新颖的概念模型(),该模型在CFIR框架内整合了紧张关系和管理策略。TIIPS的一个关键贡献在于它能够直观呈现实施领域内和跨领域的社会冲突,从而更清楚地理解创新实施中涉及的挑战和机遇。我们将TIIPs应用于远程医疗实施,得出对实践、政策和研究的启示,以实现医疗保健组织中远程医疗的成功实施。这种方法推进了现有框架,符合当今医疗保健领导力所需的系统思维。