Emory University, Department of Sociology, 1555 Dickey Dr, 225 Tarbutton Hall, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Sleep Health. 2017 Feb;3(1):22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
To determine the associations between average family and friend social support and strain over 10 years and sleep quality, sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and night-to-night total sleep time variability.
Non-institutionalized English-speaking US adults aged 34-81 who participated in the MacArthur Study on Aging: Midlife in the United States.
Sleep quality was assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and by a 7-day daily diary. Sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and night-to-night total sleep time variability were assessed by actigraphy (MiniMitter 64).
Social support, but not social strain, was significantly associated with both self-reported measures of quality (social support β=-1.239, P=.019 for global Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores; social support β=-0.248, P=.016 for diary assessed quality). Lower scores on both quality measures indicate better sleep. In contrast, social strain, but not social support, was significantly associated with sleep efficiency (social strain β=-3.780, P=.007). Social strain, but not social support, was significantly associated with night-to-night sleep variability (social strain β=0.421, P=.034); however, the overall model was not significant. Neither social support nor social strain was significantly associated with total sleep time.
Social support was significant for self-reported sleep, whereas only social strain was significantly associated with objective sleep parameters. Future research on social relationships and sleep should analyze both positive and negative aspects of relationships in tandem because effects appear to differ based on outcome.
确定 10 年来平均家庭和朋友社会支持与压力与睡眠质量、睡眠效率、总睡眠时间和夜间总睡眠时间变异性之间的关系。
参加美国麦克阿瑟老龄化研究:美国中年的非机构化英语成年参与者。
睡眠质量通过匹兹堡睡眠质量指数和 7 天的日常日记进行评估。通过活动记录仪(MiniMitter 64)评估睡眠效率、总睡眠时间和夜间总睡眠时间变异性。
社会支持,但不是社会压力,与自我报告的质量指标显著相关(社会支持β=-1.239,P=.019 用于全球匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分;社会支持β=-0.248,P=.016 用于日记评估的质量)。这两个质量指标的得分越低,睡眠质量越好。相比之下,社会压力,但不是社会支持,与睡眠效率显著相关(社会压力β=-3.780,P=.007)。社会压力,但不是社会支持,与夜间睡眠变异性显著相关(社会压力β=0.421,P=.034);然而,整体模型并不显著。社会支持和社会压力均与总睡眠时间无显著相关性。
社会支持对自我报告的睡眠有重要影响,而只有社会压力与客观睡眠参数显著相关。未来关于社会关系和睡眠的研究应该同时分析关系的积极和消极方面,因为根据结果,影响似乎有所不同。