Gault M H, Campbell N R, Aksu A E
Department of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital, St. John's, Nfld., Canada.
Nephron. 1988;48(4):274-9. doi: 10.1159/000184941.
One hundred and sixteen (3.5%) of 3,300 specimens submitted by 72 patients as urinary stones were artifacts, i.e. not formed of accepted constituents of urinary calculi. The laboratory diagnostic methods included infrared and wet chemical analysis, and X-ray diffraction. Twenty-eight were of organic origin and some of these were undoubtedly submitted by accident as calculi. Eighty-eight were of mineral origin, mainly quartz and feldspar, and it is believed that the great majority were submitted for secondary gain or for psychiatric reasons. Ten patients each submitted from 2 to 10 artifacts. Five cases studies are presented which illustrate some confounding clinical and laboratory findings. Spurious stones can lead to difficult clinical and laboratory problems.
在72名患者提交的3300份作为尿路结石的标本中,有116份(3.5%)是伪像,即不是由公认的尿路结石成分构成。实验室诊断方法包括红外和湿化学分析以及X射线衍射。28份来自有机物质,其中一些无疑是偶然作为结石提交的。88份来自矿物质,主要是石英和长石,据信绝大多数是为了获取私利或出于精神方面的原因而提交的。有10名患者每人提交了2至10份伪像。现展示5个病例研究,以说明一些令人困惑的临床和实验室检查结果。假性结石会导致临床和实验室方面的难题。