Er Füsun, Iscen Pınar, Sahin Sevki, Çinar Nilgun, Karsidag Sibel, Goularas Dionysis
Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Yeditepe University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Neuroscience, Experimental Medicine and Research Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Aug;42:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
This study aims to examine the distinguishability of age-related cognitive decline (ARCD) from dementias based on some neurocognitive tests using machine learning.
106 subjects were divided into four groups: ARCD (n=30), probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) (n=20), vascular dementia (VD) (n=21) and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n=35). The following tests were applied to all subjects: The Wechsler memory scale-revised, a clock-drawing, the dual similarities, interpretation of proverbs, word fluency, the Stroop, the Boston naming (BNT), the Benton face recognition, a copying-drawings and Öktem verbal memory processes (Ö-VMPT) tests. A multilayer perceptron, a support vector machine and a classification via regression with M5-model trees were employed for classification.
The pairwise classification results show that ARCD is completely separable from AD with a success rate of 100% and highly separable from MCI and VD with success rates of 95.4% and 86.30%, respectively. The neurocognitive tests with the higher merit values were Ö-VMPT recognition (ARCD vs. AD), Ö-VMPT total learning (ARCD vs. MCI) and semantic fluency, proverbs, Stroop interference and naming BNT (ARCD vs. VD).
The findings show that machine learning can be successfully utilized for distinguishing ARCD from dementias based on neurocognitive tests.
本研究旨在通过机器学习,基于一些神经认知测试来检验年龄相关性认知衰退(ARCD)与痴呆症之间的可区分性。
106名受试者被分为四组:ARCD组(n = 30)、可能的阿尔茨海默病(AD)组(n = 20)、血管性痴呆(VD)组(n = 21)和遗忘型轻度认知障碍(MCI)组(n = 35)。对所有受试者进行了以下测试:修订版韦氏记忆量表、画钟测试、双重相似性测试、谚语解释、词语流畅性测试、斯特鲁普测试、波士顿命名测试(BNT)、本顿面部识别测试、临摹绘图测试以及奥克泰姆言语记忆过程(Ö-VMPT)测试。采用多层感知器、支持向量机以及基于M5模型树的回归分类法进行分类。
两两分类结果显示,ARCD与AD完全可分离,成功率为100%;与MCI和VD高度可分离,成功率分别为95.4%和86.30%。具有较高价值的神经认知测试为Ö-VMPT识别(ARCD与AD对比)、Ö-VMPT总学习量(ARCD与MCI对比)以及语义流畅性、谚语、斯特鲁普干扰和BNT命名(ARCD与VD对比)。
研究结果表明,基于神经认知测试,机器学习可成功用于区分ARCD与痴呆症。