Suppr超能文献

取栓支架取栓失败:卒中管理中的一项挑战。

Stentriever Thrombectomy Failure: A Challenge in Stroke Management.

作者信息

Baracchini Claudio, Farina Filippo, Soso Matteo, Viaro Federica, Favaretto Silvia, Palmieri Anna, Kulyk Caterina, Ballotta Enzo, Nico Lorena, Cester Giacomo, Causin Francesco

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua School of Medicine, Padua, Italy.

Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua School of Medicine, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.070. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Stentriever thrombectomy failure in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by anterior circulation large artery occlusion is not a rare event. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether other procedures (tirofiban, permanent stenting) are able to recanalize the occluded vessel and determine a better outcome without increasing mortality and intracranial hemorrhage rates.

METHODS

Among 513 patients consecutively admitted with anterior circulation stroke, 109 underwent stentriever thrombectomy. Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) 2b-3 recanalization was achieved in 60 patients (55.0%, group 1). Only 3 of 19 patients (group 2) obtained additional recanalization with intra-arterial infusion of tirofiban. The remaining 46 either underwent permanent stenting (n = 23, group 3) or were left nonrecanalized (n = 23, group 4). The rate of mTICI 2b-3 and clinical outcomes were analyzed in the different groups.

RESULTS

A successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) was achieved in 17 patients of group 3 (73.9%). A significantly better outcome was observed in group 3 (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score, 0-2) than in group 4 at 3 months (56.5% vs. 17.4%). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates were not different between group 3 and group 4 (4.3% vs. 4.3%), whereas there was a significantly higher mortality in group 4 than in group 3 (39.1% vs. 4.3%). On multivariate analysis, permanent stenting was the only factor independently associated with favorable outcome and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Permanent stenting might be a feasible solution in patients with acute large artery occlusion after stentriever thrombectomy failure.

摘要

背景与目的

在前循环大动脉闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中患者中,取栓支架取栓失败并非罕见事件。本研究旨在探讨其他操作(替罗非班、永久性支架置入)能否使闭塞血管再通,并在不增加死亡率和颅内出血率的情况下确定更好的预后。

方法

在513例连续收治的前循环卒中患者中,109例接受了取栓支架取栓治疗。60例患者(55.0%,第1组)实现了改良脑缺血溶栓(mTICI)2b-3级再通。19例患者中的3例(第2组)通过动脉内输注替罗非班实现了额外再通。其余46例患者要么接受了永久性支架置入(n = 23,第3组),要么未实现再通(n = 23,第4组)。分析了不同组的mTICI 2b-3级率和临床结局。

结果

第3组的17例患者(73.9%)实现了成功再通(mTICI 2b-3级)。在3个月时,第3组(改良Rankin量表[mRS]评分,0-2)的预后明显优于第4组(56.5%对17.4%)。第3组和第4组的症状性颅内出血率无差异(4.3%对4.3%),而第4组的死亡率明显高于第3组(39.1%对4.3%)。多因素分析显示,永久性支架置入是唯一与良好预后和死亡率独立相关的因素。

结论

对于取栓支架取栓失败后的急性大动脉闭塞患者,永久性支架置入可能是一种可行的解决方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验