• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国医院资源强度与肝硬化死亡率

Hospital resource intensity and cirrhosis mortality in United States.

作者信息

Mathur Amit K, Chakrabarti Apurba K, Mellinger Jessica L, Volk Michael L, Day Ryan, Singer Andrew L, Hewitt Winston R, Reddy Kunam S, Moss Adyr A

机构信息

Amit K Mathur, Ryan Day, Andrew L Singer, Winston R Hewitt, Kunam S Reddy, Adyr A Moss, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, United States.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 14;23(10):1857-1865. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1857.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1857
PMID:28348492
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5352927/
Abstract

AIM

To determine whether hospital characteristics predict cirrhosis mortality and how much variation in mortality is attributable to hospital differences.

METHODS

We used data from the 2005-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample and the American Hospital Association Annual survey to identify hospitalizations for decompensated cirrhosis and corresponding facility characteristics. We created hospital-specific risk and reliability-adjusted odds ratios for cirrhosis mortality, and evaluated patient and facility differences based on hospital performance quintiles. We used hierarchical regression models to determine the effect of these factors on mortality.

RESULTS

Seventy-two thousand seven hundred and thirty-three cirrhosis admissions were evaluated in 805 hospitals. Hospital mean cirrhosis annual case volume was 90.4 (range 25-828). Overall hospital cirrhosis mortality rate was 8.00%. Hospital-adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for mortality ranged from 0.48 to 1.89. Patient characteristics varied significantly by hospital aOR for mortality. Length of stay averaged 6.0 ± 1.6 days, and varied significantly by hospital performance ( < 0.001). Facility level predictors of risk-adjusted mortality were higher Medicaid case-mix (OR = 1.00, = 0.029) and LPN staffing (OR = 1.02, = 0.015). Higher cirrhosis volume (OR = 0.99, = 0.025) and liver transplant program status (OR = 0.83, = 0.026) were significantly associated with survival. After adjusting for patient differences, era, and clustering effects, 15.3% of variation between hospitals was attributable to differences in facility characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Hospital characteristics account for a significant proportion of variation in cirrhosis mortality. These findings have several implications for patients, providers, and health care delivery in liver disease care and inpatient health care design.

摘要

目的

确定医院特征是否能预测肝硬化死亡率,以及死亡率的多少差异可归因于医院差异。

方法

我们使用了2005 - 2011年全国住院患者样本数据和美国医院协会年度调查数据,以确定失代偿期肝硬化的住院情况及相应的医院特征。我们创建了针对医院的肝硬化死亡率风险及可靠性调整后的比值比,并根据医院绩效五分位数评估患者和医院差异。我们使用分层回归模型来确定这些因素对死亡率的影响。

结果

在805家医院中评估了72733例肝硬化入院病例。医院平均每年肝硬化病例数为90.4(范围25 - 828)。总体医院肝硬化死亡率为8.00%。医院调整后的死亡率比值比(aOR)范围为0.48至1.89。患者特征因医院死亡率aOR而有显著差异。住院时间平均为6.0±1.6天,且因医院绩效有显著差异(<0.001)。风险调整后死亡率的医院层面预测因素为较高的医疗补助病例组合(OR = 1.00, = 0.029)和 Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN)人员配备(OR = 1.02, = 0.015)。较高的肝硬化病例数(OR = 0.99, = 0.025)和肝移植项目状态(OR = 0.83, = 0.026)与生存率显著相关。在调整患者差异、时期和聚类效应后,医院间15.3%的差异可归因于医院特征差异。

结论

医院特征在肝硬化死亡率差异中占很大比例。这些发现对肝病护理中的患者、医疗服务提供者以及医疗保健提供和住院医疗保健设计有若干启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77d/5352927/60dc097cebff/WJG-23-1857-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77d/5352927/ce396308b3d2/WJG-23-1857-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77d/5352927/60dc097cebff/WJG-23-1857-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77d/5352927/ce396308b3d2/WJG-23-1857-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77d/5352927/60dc097cebff/WJG-23-1857-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Hospital resource intensity and cirrhosis mortality in United States.美国医院资源强度与肝硬化死亡率
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 14;23(10):1857-1865. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1857.
2
Hospitalizations for Cardiovascular Disease After Liver Transplantation in the United States.美国肝移植术后心血管疾病的住院治疗情况。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Oct;24(10):1398-1410. doi: 10.1002/lt.25055.
3
Hospital performance reports based on severity adjusted mortality rates in patients with cirrhosis depend on the method of risk adjustment .基于肝硬化患者校正死亡率的医院绩效报告取决于风险调整方法。
Ann Hepatol. 2012 Jul-Aug;11(4):526-35.
4
The inpatient economic and mortality impact of hepatocellular carcinoma from 2005 to 2009: analysis of the US nationwide inpatient sample.2005 年至 2009 年肝癌患者的住院经济和死亡率影响:美国全国住院患者样本分析。
Liver Int. 2013 Sep;33(8):1281-6. doi: 10.1111/liv.12201. Epub 2013 May 26.
5
Variation among United States hospitals in inpatient mortality for cirrhosis.美国各医院肝硬化患者住院死亡率的差异。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;13(3):577-84; quiz e30. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.038. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
6
Inpatient economic and mortality assessment for liver transplantation: a nationwide study of the United States data from 2005 to 2009.肝移植患者的经济和死亡率评估:2005 年至 2009 年美国全国范围的数据研究。
Transplantation. 2014 Jan 15;97(1):98-103. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a716ac.
7
In-hospital mortality and economic burden associated with hepatic encephalopathy in the United States from 2005 to 2009.2005 年至 2009 年美国肝性脑病的住院死亡率和经济负担。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Sep;10(9):1034-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 May 27.
8
Care of patients undergoing vascular surgery at safety net public hospitals is associated with higher cost but similar mortality to nonsafety net hospitals.在安全网公立医院接受血管手术的患者护理成本较高,但死亡率与非安全网医院相似。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Dec;60(6):1627-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.055. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
9
Increasing Volume but Decreasing Mortality of Hospitalized Hepatitis C Patients in the United States, 2005 to 2011.2005年至2011年美国住院丙型肝炎患者数量增加但死亡率下降
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug;49(7):620-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000216.
10
The benefit of paracentesis on hospitalized adults with cirrhosis and ascites.腹腔穿刺术对肝硬化腹水住院成人患者的益处。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;31(5):1025-30. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13255.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing practice variations in the care of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis across the University of California Health.描述加州大学健康系统内肝硬化住院患者护理中的实践差异。
Liver Transpl. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000630.
2
The Role of Hospital Characteristics in Clinical and Quality Outcomes for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in a National Cohort.医院特征在全国队列中胃肠道出血的临床和质量结局中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 1;119(8):1616-1623. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002755. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
3
Factors Associated with in-Hospital Mortality in Malagasy Patients with Acute Decompensation of Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cohort.

本文引用的文献

1
Pancreaticoduodenectomy at High-volume Centers: Surgeon Volume Goes Beyond the Leapfrog Criteria.高手术量中心的胰十二指肠切除术:外科医生手术量超越了“跳蛙”标准。
Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):e37-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001330.
2
Decreasing mortality in patients hospitalized with cirrhosis.降低肝硬化住院患者的死亡率。
Gastroenterology. 2015 May;148(5):897-900. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
3
Decreasing mortality among patients hospitalized with cirrhosis in the United States from 2002 through 2010.
马达加斯加肝硬化急性失代偿患者院内死亡的相关因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Hepat Med. 2023 Mar 12;15:21-26. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S401628. eCollection 2023.
4
Adherence to quality indicators and hospital outcomes for patients with decompensated cirrhosis: An observational study.失代偿期肝硬化患者对质量指标的依从性与医院结局:一项观察性研究。
Can Liver J. 2020 Nov 17;3(4):348-357. doi: 10.3138/canlivj-2020-0003. eCollection 2020 Fall.
5
MELD is MELD is MELD? Transplant center-level variation in waitlist mortality for candidates with the same biological MELD.MELD 就是 MELD 吗?对于具有相同生物学 MELD 的候选者,移植中心在等待名单死亡率方面存在差异。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Oct;21(10):3305-3311. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16603. Epub 2021 May 15.
6
Increasing Hospitalization Rates for Cirrhosis: Overrepresentation of Disadvantaged Australians.肝硬化住院率上升:澳大利亚弱势群体的比例过高。
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jun 13;11:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.05.007. eCollection 2019 May-Jun.
7
Women on the liver transplantation waitlist are at increased risk of hospitalization compared to men.女性在肝移植等待名单上比男性面临更高的住院风险。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 28;25(8):980-988. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i8.980.
8
Gender Differences Among Patients Hospitalized With Cirrhosis in the United States.美国肝硬化住院患者的性别差异。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;54(1):83-89. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001192.
9
Superior Performance of Teaching and Transplant Hospitals in the Management of Hepatic Encephalopathy from 2007 to 2014.2007年至2014年教学医院和移植医院在肝性脑病管理方面的卓越表现
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2018 Dec 28;6(4):362-371. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2017.00078. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
10
qSOFA score not predictive of in-hospital mortality in emergency patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.qSOFA评分不能预测失代偿期肝硬化急诊患者的院内死亡率。
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019 Nov;114(8):724-732. doi: 10.1007/s00063-018-0477-z. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
2002年至2010年期间美国肝硬化住院患者死亡率的下降情况。
Gastroenterology. 2015 May;148(5):967-977.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.032. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
4
Improving quality of health care for patients with cirrhosis.改善肝硬化患者的医疗保健质量。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Dec;147(6):1204-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.029. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
5
Variation among United States hospitals in inpatient mortality for cirrhosis.美国各医院肝硬化患者住院死亡率的差异。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;13(3):577-84; quiz e30. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.038. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
6
Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era.现代医院的手术量与手术死亡率
Ann Surg. 2014 Aug;260(2):244-51. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000375.
7
Coordinating care in patients with cirrhosis.肝硬化患者的护理协调
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;11(7):859-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
8
Multidisciplinary management of patients with cirrhosis: a need for care coordination.肝硬化患者的多学科管理:需要进行护理协调。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Mar;11(3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.040. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
9
The quality of care provided to patients with cirrhosis and ascites in the Department of Veterans Affairs.退伍军人事务部为肝硬化伴腹水患者提供的护理质量。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Jul;143(1):70-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.03.038. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
10
Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery.医院手术量与高危手术的抢救失败。
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49(12):1076-81. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182329b97.