• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Variation among United States hospitals in inpatient mortality for cirrhosis.美国各医院肝硬化患者住院死亡率的差异。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;13(3):577-84; quiz e30. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.038. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
2
Development of a novel clinical staging model for cirrhosis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.利用全国住院患者样本开发肝硬化的新型临床分期模型。
J Investig Med. 2018 Aug;66(6):992-997. doi: 10.1136/jim-2018-000709. Epub 2018 May 14.
3
Nationwide increase in hospitalizations and hepatitis C among inpatients with cirrhosis and sequelae of portal hypertension.肝硬化和门静脉高压后遗症住院患者中住院率和丙型肝炎在全国范围内的上升。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;5(9):1092-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.027. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
4
Increasing Burden of Hepatic Encephalopathy Among Hospitalized Adults: An Analysis of the 2010-2014 National Inpatient Sample.住院成年人肝性脑病负担增加:2010-2014 年全国住院患者样本分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jun;64(6):1448-1457. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05576-9. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
5
Protein-calorie malnutrition as a prognostic indicator of mortality among patients hospitalized with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.蛋白质 - 热量营养不良作为肝硬化和门静脉高压症住院患者死亡率的预后指标。
Liver Int. 2009 Oct;29(9):1396-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02077.x. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
6
Hospital resource intensity and cirrhosis mortality in United States.美国医院资源强度与肝硬化死亡率
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 14;23(10):1857-1865. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1857.
7
Paracentesis is associated with reduced mortality in patients hospitalized with cirrhosis and ascites.经皮穿刺引流术与肝硬化和腹水住院患者的死亡率降低相关。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;12(3):496-503.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.025. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
8
The Effect of Hospital Characteristics on Racial/Ethnic Variation in Cirrhosis Mortality.医院特征对肝硬化死亡率的种族/民族差异的影响。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Apr;4(2):243-251. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0223-2. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
9
Improving Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients With Cirrhosis in the United States: A Nationwide Assessment.改善美国肝硬化患者减重手术的结局:一项全国性评估。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov;115(11):1849-1856. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000911.
10
Portal vein thrombosis prevalence and associated mortality in cirrhosis in a nationally representative inpatient cohort.全国代表性住院患者队列中肝硬化门静脉血栓形成的患病率及其相关死亡率。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;34(6):1088-1092. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14501. Epub 2018 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of in-hospital mortality among cirrhotic patients in Ethiopia: A multicenter retrospective study.埃塞俄比亚肝硬化患者院内死亡率的预测因素:一项多中心回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0322532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322532. eCollection 2025.
2
Characterizing practice variations in the care of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis across the University of California Health.描述加州大学健康系统内肝硬化住院患者护理中的实践差异。
Liver Transpl. 2025 Apr 26. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000630.
3
Albumin for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: Care Variation, Disparities, and Outcomes.白蛋白用于自发性细菌性腹膜炎:护理差异、差距及结局
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 12. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003190.
4
Geographic disparities in access to liver transplantation.肝脏移植可及性的地域差异。
Liver Transpl. 2023 Sep 1;29(9):987-997. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000182. Epub 2023 May 29.
5
Impact of cardiac and noncardiac cirrhosis on coronary revascularization outcomes from the National Inpatient Sample, 2016 to 2018.2016年至2018年全国住院患者样本中心脏性和非心脏性肝硬化对冠状动脉血运重建结局的影响
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Nov 17;36(2):195-200. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2139989. eCollection 2023.
6
Rising incidence, progression and changing patterns of liver disease in Wales 1999-2019.1999 - 2019年威尔士肝病发病率上升、病情进展及模式变化
World J Hepatol. 2023 Jan 27;15(1):89-106. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i1.89.
7
Nationwide analysis of incidence and predictors of 30-day readmissions in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.失代偿期肝硬化患者30天再入院率及预测因素的全国性分析。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 2;13(4):295-302. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101850. eCollection 2022.
8
Trends and Outcomes of Alcoholic Liver Cirrhosis Hospitalizations in the Last Two Decades: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.过去二十年酒精性肝硬化住院治疗的趋势与结果:基于全国住院患者样本的分析
Gastroenterology Res. 2022 Apr;15(2):91-99. doi: 10.14740/gr1517. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
9
Association of treatments for acute appendicitis with pregnancy outcomes in the United States from 2000 to 2016: Results from a multi-level analysis.2000 年至 2016 年美国急性阑尾炎治疗与妊娠结局的关联:多层次分析结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 13;16(12):e0260991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260991. eCollection 2021.
10
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Modestly Enhance Prediction of Readmission in Patients with Cirrhosis.患者报告的结局测量适度增强了对肝硬化患者再入院的预测。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;20(6):e1426-e1437. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.032. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Underestimation of liver-related mortality in the United States.美国对与肝脏相关的死亡率的低估。
Gastroenterology. 2013 Aug;145(2):375-82.e1-2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
2
Geographic variation in Medicare services.医疗保险服务的地域差异。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 18;368(16):1465-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1302981. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
3
Multidisciplinary management of patients with cirrhosis: a need for care coordination.肝硬化患者的多学科管理:需要进行护理协调。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Mar;11(3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.040. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
4
Comparing local and regional variation in health care spending.比较医疗保健支出的地方和区域差异。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 1;367(18):1724-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1203980.
5
Regional variation in anesthesia assistance during outpatient colonoscopy is not associated with differences in polyp detection or complication rates.门诊结肠镜检查时麻醉辅助的区域差异与息肉检出率或并发症发生率的差异无关。
Gastroenterology. 2013 Feb;144(2):298-306. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.038. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
6
Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update.美国胃肠道疾病负担:2012 年更新。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-1187.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
7
Postoperative health-care utilization in Crohn's disease: the impact of specialist care.克罗恩病术后的保健利用:专家护理的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;107(10):1522-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.235. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
8
Hospital performance reports based on severity adjusted mortality rates in patients with cirrhosis depend on the method of risk adjustment .基于肝硬化患者校正死亡率的医院绩效报告取决于风险调整方法。
Ann Hepatol. 2012 Jul-Aug;11(4):526-35.
9
The quality of care provided to patients with cirrhosis and ascites in the Department of Veterans Affairs.退伍军人事务部为肝硬化伴腹水患者提供的护理质量。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Jul;143(1):70-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.03.038. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
10
Hospital readmissions among patients with decompensated cirrhosis.失代偿期肝硬化患者的住院再入院率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb;107(2):247-52. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.314. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

美国各医院肝硬化患者住院死亡率的差异。

Variation among United States hospitals in inpatient mortality for cirrhosis.

作者信息

Mellinger Jessica L, Richardson Caroline R, Mathur Amit K, Volk Michael L

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;13(3):577-84; quiz e30. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.038. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.038
PMID:25264271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4333025/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about geographic variations in health care for patients with cirrhosis. We studied geographic and hospital-level variations in care of patients with cirrhosis in the United States by using inpatient mortality as an outcome for comparing hospitals. We also aimed to identify features of patients and hospitals associated with lower mortality.

METHODS

We used the 2009 U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify patients with cirrhosis, which were based on the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision-Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for cirrhosis or 1 of its complications (ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, portal hypertension, or hepatic encephalopathy). Multilevel modeling was performed to measure variance among hospitals.

RESULTS

There were 102,155 admissions for cirrhosis in 2009, compared with 74,417 in 2003. Overall inpatient mortality was 6.6%. On multivariable-adjusted logistic regression, patients hospitalized in the Midwest had the lowest odds ratio (OR) of inpatient mortality (OR, 0.54; P < .001). Patients who were transferred from other hospitals (OR, 1.49; P < .001) or had hepatic encephalopathy (OR, 1.28; P < .001), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 1.74; P < .001), or alcoholic liver disease (OR, 1.23; P = .03) had higher odds of inpatient mortality than patients without these features. Those who received liver transplants had substantially lower odds of inpatient mortality (OR, 0.21; P < .001). Multilevel modeling showed that 4% of the variation in mortality could be accounted for at the hospital level (P < .001). Adjusted mortality among hospitals ranged from 1.2% to 14.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient cirrhosis mortality varies considerably among U.S. hospitals. Further research is needed to identify hospital-level and provider-level practices that could be modified to improve outcomes.

摘要

背景与目的

关于肝硬化患者医疗保健的地理差异,人们了解甚少。我们通过将住院死亡率作为比较医院的指标,研究了美国肝硬化患者护理的地理和医院层面差异。我们还旨在确定与较低死亡率相关的患者和医院特征。

方法

我们使用2009年美国全国住院患者样本,根据国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本中肝硬化或其并发症(腹水、肝肾综合征、上消化道出血、门静脉高压或肝性脑病)的诊断代码来识别肝硬化患者。进行多水平建模以测量医院间的差异。

结果

2009年有102,155例肝硬化住院病例,而2003年为74,417例。总体住院死亡率为6.6%。在多变量调整的逻辑回归分析中,在美国中西部住院的患者住院死亡率的比值比(OR)最低(OR为0.54;P <.001)。从其他医院转来的患者(OR为1.49;P <.001)、患有肝性脑病的患者(OR为1.28;P <.001)、上消化道出血的患者(OR为1.74;P <.001)或酒精性肝病患者(OR为1.23;P = 0.03)的住院死亡率比没有这些特征的患者更高。接受肝移植的患者住院死亡率的比值比显著更低(OR为0.21;P <.001)。多水平建模显示,死亡率差异的4%可归因于医院层面(P <.001)。医院调整后的死亡率在1.2%至14.2%之间。

结论

美国各医院的肝硬化住院死亡率差异很大。需要进一步研究以确定可改进的医院层面和医疗服务提供者层面的做法,以改善治疗结果。