Mellinger Jessica L, Richardson Caroline R, Mathur Amit K, Volk Michael L
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Mar;13(3):577-84; quiz e30. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.038. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about geographic variations in health care for patients with cirrhosis. We studied geographic and hospital-level variations in care of patients with cirrhosis in the United States by using inpatient mortality as an outcome for comparing hospitals. We also aimed to identify features of patients and hospitals associated with lower mortality.
We used the 2009 U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify patients with cirrhosis, which were based on the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision-Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for cirrhosis or 1 of its complications (ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, portal hypertension, or hepatic encephalopathy). Multilevel modeling was performed to measure variance among hospitals.
There were 102,155 admissions for cirrhosis in 2009, compared with 74,417 in 2003. Overall inpatient mortality was 6.6%. On multivariable-adjusted logistic regression, patients hospitalized in the Midwest had the lowest odds ratio (OR) of inpatient mortality (OR, 0.54; P < .001). Patients who were transferred from other hospitals (OR, 1.49; P < .001) or had hepatic encephalopathy (OR, 1.28; P < .001), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 1.74; P < .001), or alcoholic liver disease (OR, 1.23; P = .03) had higher odds of inpatient mortality than patients without these features. Those who received liver transplants had substantially lower odds of inpatient mortality (OR, 0.21; P < .001). Multilevel modeling showed that 4% of the variation in mortality could be accounted for at the hospital level (P < .001). Adjusted mortality among hospitals ranged from 1.2% to 14.2%.
Inpatient cirrhosis mortality varies considerably among U.S. hospitals. Further research is needed to identify hospital-level and provider-level practices that could be modified to improve outcomes.
关于肝硬化患者医疗保健的地理差异,人们了解甚少。我们通过将住院死亡率作为比较医院的指标,研究了美国肝硬化患者护理的地理和医院层面差异。我们还旨在确定与较低死亡率相关的患者和医院特征。
我们使用2009年美国全国住院患者样本,根据国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本中肝硬化或其并发症(腹水、肝肾综合征、上消化道出血、门静脉高压或肝性脑病)的诊断代码来识别肝硬化患者。进行多水平建模以测量医院间的差异。
2009年有102,155例肝硬化住院病例,而2003年为74,417例。总体住院死亡率为6.6%。在多变量调整的逻辑回归分析中,在美国中西部住院的患者住院死亡率的比值比(OR)最低(OR为0.54;P <.001)。从其他医院转来的患者(OR为1.49;P <.001)、患有肝性脑病的患者(OR为1.28;P <.001)、上消化道出血的患者(OR为1.74;P <.001)或酒精性肝病患者(OR为1.23;P = 0.03)的住院死亡率比没有这些特征的患者更高。接受肝移植的患者住院死亡率的比值比显著更低(OR为0.21;P <.001)。多水平建模显示,死亡率差异的4%可归因于医院层面(P <.001)。医院调整后的死亡率在1.2%至14.2%之间。
美国各医院的肝硬化住院死亡率差异很大。需要进一步研究以确定可改进的医院层面和医疗服务提供者层面的做法,以改善治疗结果。