Carboni Gian Piero
Consultant in Cardiology. Director of the Nuclear Cardiology Service, Universita Campus-Bio Medico di Roma. Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00124 Roma, Italy. Email:
Cardiol Res. 2012 Aug;3(4):164-171. doi: 10.4021/cr203w. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
Fifteen patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and inducible ischaemia were studied to determine the mechanisms of mortality. Failure of the contractile reserve during daily life activities may reflect a prognostic index.
Single photon emission cardiac tomography and radionuclide ambulatory monitoring (Vest) data were analysed in all patients with a 7-year follow-up.
At peak exercise on Vest, the 7 non-survivors (N-SURV) showed worse peak ejection rates (PERs) and ejection fractions (EFs) compared with the 8 survivors (SURV), (2 ± 0.6 vs. 3.3 ± 0.7; end-diastolic volumes (EDVs), P < 0.003), and (34 ± 10% vs. 50 ± 13%; P < 0.02), respectively. However, exercise peak filling rates (PFRs) (1.9 ± 0.6 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9; EDVs/s) and exercise heart rates (HRs), (97 ± 17 vs. 106 ± 10), did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). In SURV, exercise PERs, which represented rapid left ventricular (LV) emptying, were significantly correlated with exercise PFRs, representing rapid LV filling, (r = 0.71, P < 0.04) but not in N-SURV (r = 0.66, P > 0.05). Among SURV, the Frank-Starling mechanism was thus preserved but not in N-SURV. Upon Cox analysis, overall LV function parameters, exercise PER was the only predictive measure associated with mortality (b = - 0.018, relative hazard ratio = 0.98, P = 0.02).
Exercise PER reduced values reflected failure of the Frank-Starling mechanism, the incapacity of the heart to perform rapid contractile adaptations to daily life activities and a poor prognosis.
对15例缺血性心肌病且存在诱发性缺血的患者进行研究,以确定死亡机制。日常生活活动期间收缩储备功能的衰竭可能反映一种预后指标。
对所有患者的单光子发射计算机断层扫描和放射性核素动态监测(背心式)数据进行分析,并进行7年随访。
在背心式监测的运动峰值时,7例非幸存者(N-SURV)与8例幸存者(SURV)相比,表现出更差的峰值射血率(PERs)和射血分数(EFs),分别为(2±0.6对3.3±0.7;舒张末期容积(EDVs),P<0.003),以及(34±10%对50±13%;P<0.02)。然而,两组之间的运动峰值充盈率(PFRs)(1.9±0.6对2.7±0.9;EDVs/秒)和运动心率(HRs)(97±17对106±10)并无差异(P>0.05)。在SURV组中,代表左心室(LV)快速排空的运动PERs与代表LV快速充盈的运动PFRs显著相关(r=0.71,P<0.04),但在N-SURV组中并非如此(r=0.66,P>0.05)。因此,在SURV组中,Frank-Starling机制得以保留,但在N-SURV组中则不然。经Cox分析,总体LV功能参数中,运动PER是与死亡率相关的唯一预测指标(b=-0.018,相对风险比=0.98,P=0.02)。
运动PER降低值反映了Frank-Starling机制的衰竭、心脏无法对日常生活活动进行快速收缩适应以及预后不良。