Yang Chong, Dreuw Andreas
Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 205, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
J Comput Chem. 2017 Jun 30;38(17):1528-1537. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24794. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
The applicability and limitations of the restricted virtual space (RVS) approximation within the algebraic-diagrammatic construction (ADC) scheme for the polarization propagator up to third order is evaluated. In RVS-ADC, not only the core but also a substantial amount of energetically high-lying virtual orbitals is restricted in excitation energy calculations of low-lying excited electronic states. Using octatetraene, indole, and pyridine as representative examples and different standard basis sets of triple-zeta quality, RVS-ADC(2) turns out to be highly useful and to have negligible effects on ππ* excited states. However, for nπ* or πσ* states, the RVS approximation is generally less reliable but better at third-order than second-order ADC level. In addition, a unified, basis-set independent, thus normalized virtual orbital threshold (value) is introduced, making the RVS approximation more controllable and a priori applicable. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
评估了代数图构建(ADC)方案中受限虚拟空间(RVS)近似对于极化传播子直至三阶的适用性和局限性。在RVS-ADC中,不仅核心而且大量高能虚拟轨道在低激发电子态的激发能计算中受到限制。以八碳四烯、吲哚和吡啶作为代表性例子,并使用不同的三重ζ质量标准基组,结果表明RVS-ADC(2)非常有用,并且对ππ激发态的影响可忽略不计。然而,对于nπ或πσ*态,RVS近似通常不太可靠,但在三阶时比二阶ADC水平要好。此外,引入了一个统一的、与基组无关的、因此归一化的虚拟轨道阈值,使得RVS近似更可控且可先验应用。© 2017威利期刊公司