Milioli Heloisa H, Tishchenko Inna, Riveros Carlos, Berretta Regina, Moscato Pablo
Centre for Bioinformatics, Biomarker Discovery and Information-Based Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, 2305, Australia.
School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, Australia.
BMC Med Genomics. 2017 Mar 28;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12920-017-0250-9.
Basal-like constitutes an important molecular subtype of breast cancer characterised by an aggressive behaviour and a limited therapy response. The outcome of patients within this subtype is, however, divergent. Some individuals show an increased risk of dying in the first five years, and others a long-term survival of over ten years after the diagnosis. In this study, we aim at identifying markers associated with basal-like patients' survival and characterising subgroups with distinct disease outcome.
We explored the genomic and transcriptomic profiles of 351 basal-like samples from the METABRIC and ROCK data sets. Two selection methods, labelled Differential and Survival filters, were employed to determine genes/probes that are differentially expressed in tumour and control samples, and are associated with overall survival. These probes were further used to define molecular subgroups, which vary at the microRNA level and in DNA copy number.
We identified the expression signature of 80 probes that distinguishes between two basal-like subgroups with distinct clinical features and survival outcomes. Genes included in this list have been mainly linked to cancer immune response, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cell cycle. In particular, high levels of CXCR6, HCST, C3AR1 and FPR3 were found in Basal I; whereas HJURP, RRP12 and DNMT3B appeared over-expressed in Basal II. These genes exhibited the highest betweenness centrality and node degree values and play a key role in the basal-like breast cancer differentiation. Further molecular analysis revealed 17 miRNAs correlated to the subgroups, including hsa-miR-342-5p, -150, -155, -200c and -17. Additionally, increased percentages of gains/amplifications were detected on chromosomes 1q, 3q, 8q, 10p and 17q, and losses/deletions on 4q, 5q, 8p and X, associated with reduced survival.
The proposed signature supports the existence of at least two subgroups of basal-like breast cancers with distinct disease outcome. The identification of patients at a low risk may impact the clinical decisions-making by reducing the prescription of high-dose chemotherapy and, consequently, avoiding adverse effects. The recognition of other aggressive features within this subtype may be also critical for improving individual care and for delineating more effective therapies for patients at high risk.
基底样型是乳腺癌的一种重要分子亚型,其特点是侵袭性强且对治疗反应有限。然而,该亚型患者的预后存在差异。一些个体在诊断后的头五年内死亡风险增加,而另一些个体在诊断后能长期存活超过十年。在本研究中,我们旨在识别与基底样型患者生存相关的标志物,并对具有不同疾病预后的亚组进行特征描述。
我们探索了来自METABRIC和ROCK数据集的351个基底样型样本的基因组和转录组图谱。采用两种筛选方法,即差异筛选和生存筛选,来确定在肿瘤样本和对照样本中差异表达且与总生存相关的基因/探针。这些探针进一步用于定义分子亚组,这些亚组在微小RNA水平和DNA拷贝数方面存在差异。
我们鉴定出80个探针的表达特征,该特征可区分具有不同临床特征和生存结果的两个基底样型亚组。该列表中的基因主要与癌症免疫反应、上皮-间质转化和细胞周期相关。具体而言,在基底样型I中发现CXCR6、HCST、C3AR1和FPR3水平较高;而HJURP、RRP12和DNMT3B在基底样型II中呈过表达。这些基因表现出最高的介数中心性和节点度值,并在基底样型乳腺癌分化中起关键作用。进一步的分子分析揭示了17种与亚组相关的微小RNA,包括hsa-miR-342-5p、-150、-155、-200c和-17。此外,在1q、3q、8q、10p和17q染色体上检测到增加的增益/扩增百分比,在4q、5q、8p和X染色体上检测到缺失/缺失,这与生存降低相关。
所提出的特征支持至少存在两个具有不同疾病预后的基底样型乳腺癌亚组。识别低风险患者可能会通过减少高剂量化疗的处方来影响临床决策,从而避免不良反应。识别该亚型内的其他侵袭性特征对于改善个体护理以及为高风险患者制定更有效的治疗方案也可能至关重要。