Suppr超能文献

圣保罗市代表性样本中自我报告糖尿病的验证。

Validation of self-reported diabetes in a representative sample of São Paulo city.

作者信息

Fontanelli Mariane de Mello, Teixeira Juliana Araújo, Sales Cristiane Hermes, Castro Michelle Alessandra de, Cesar Chester Luiz Galvão, Alves Maria Cecilia Goi Porto, Goldbaum Moisés, Marchioni Dirce Maria, Fisberg Regina Mara

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Departamento do Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:20. doi: 10.1590/s1518-8787.2017051006378. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To validate the self-reported diabetes mellitus in adults and older adults living in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS We have used data of 569 subjects (284 adults and 285 older adults), participants of the population-based cross-sectional study Inquérito de Saúde do Município de São Paulo (Health Survey of São Paulo). Fasting glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) and/or use of drugs (oral hypoglycemic and/or insulin) defined the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. We have validated the self-reported diabetes mellitus by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. We have used Poisson regression with robust variance to verify the factors associated with the sensitivity of the self-reported datum. For all analyses, we have considered the sample design of the study. RESULTS The sensitivity of self-reported diabetes mellitus was 63.8% (95%CI 49.2-76.3), specificity was 99.7% (95%CI 99.1-99.9), positive predictive value was 95.5% (95%CI 84.4-98.8), and negative predictive value was 96.9% (95%CI 94.9-98.2). The correct reporting of diabetes mellitus was more prevalent among older adults (PR = 2.0; 95%CI 1.2-3.5) than among adults. CONCLUSIONS The use of the datum of self-reported diabetes mellitus is valid, especially among older adults living in the city of São Paulo. The results highlight the need to track diabetes mellitus in asymptomatic subjects who have one or more risk factors for it, mainly in the adult population of this city.

摘要

目的 验证巴西圣保罗市成年人及老年人自我报告的糖尿病情况。方法 我们使用了569名受试者(284名成年人和285名老年人)的数据,这些受试者是基于人群的横断面研究“圣保罗市健康调查”的参与者。空腹血糖≥7.0 mmol/L(126 mg/dL)和/或使用药物(口服降糖药和/或胰岛素)定义为糖尿病诊断。我们通过计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值来验证自我报告的糖尿病情况。我们使用具有稳健方差的泊松回归来验证与自我报告数据敏感性相关的因素。对于所有分析,我们考虑了研究的样本设计。结果 自我报告糖尿病的敏感性为63.8%(95%可信区间49.2 - 76.3),特异性为99.7%(95%可信区间99.1 - 99.9),阳性预测值为95.5%(95%可信区间84.4 - 98.8),阴性预测值为96.9%(95%可信区间94.9 - 98.2)。糖尿病的正确报告在老年人中(PR = 2.0;95%可信区间1.2 - 3.5)比在成年人中更普遍。结论 使用自我报告糖尿病的数据是有效的,特别是在圣保罗市的老年人中。结果强调了对有一个或多个糖尿病危险因素的无症状受试者进行糖尿病追踪的必要性,主要是在该市的成年人群中。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014.2014年糖尿病医疗护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S14-80. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验