Andrade Luis Gustavo Modelli de, Tedesco-Silva Helio
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil.
J Bras Nefrol. 2017 Mar;39(1):70-78. doi: 10.5935/0101-2800.20170012.
Registry studies and systematic reviews have shown higher risk for mortality and graft loss in patients in use of mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) compared to calcineurin-based (CNI) immunosuppressive regimens. The majority of these studies pooled data from early trials using different strategies such as "de novo" combination of the high dose mTOR inhibitors with standard dose of CNI or high dose mTORi combined with mycophenolate. The large heterogeneity of these initial exploratory studies, many of them no longer in use, turns difficult any comparison with a well-defined standard of care regimen. The new strategies using concentration controlled reduced exposure of mTORi and CNI or early conversion from CNI to mTORi use have shown comparable patient and graft survival. Nevertheless, considering the central role of mTOR in health and disease states, more research is necessary to mitigate the adverse events and to explore further the potential beneficial effects of mTOR inhibitors.
登记研究和系统评价表明,与基于钙调神经磷酸酶(CNI)的免疫抑制方案相比,使用哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂(mTORi)的患者死亡和移植物丢失风险更高。这些研究大多汇总了早期试验的数据,这些试验采用了不同策略,如高剂量mTORi与标准剂量CNI的“从头”联合或高剂量mTORi与霉酚酸酯联合。这些最初的探索性研究存在很大异质性,其中许多已不再使用,这使得与明确的标准护理方案进行任何比较都变得困难。采用浓度控制降低mTORi和CNI暴露或从CNI早期转换为mTORi使用的新策略已显示出相当的患者和移植物存活率。然而,考虑到mTOR在健康和疾病状态中的核心作用,有必要进行更多研究以减轻不良事件并进一步探索mTOR抑制剂的潜在有益作用。