Suppr超能文献

哺乳动物雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂联合钙调磷酸酶抑制剂作为肾移植初始免疫抑制的Meta 分析。

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors Combined With Calcineurin Inhibitors as Initial Immunosuppression in Renal Transplantation: A Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2019 Oct;103(10):2031-2056. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002769.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care immunosuppressive regimen in kidney transplantation (KT) includes a combination of mycophenolates (MMF/MPA) with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI).

METHODS

We designed a systematic review including all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing the outcomes in KT recipients receiving mTORi + CNI compared with regimens containing MMF/MPA or azathioprine with CNI.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies with 7356 participants were included. The comparison between mTORi-CNI and MMF/MPA-CNI did not show differences in acute rejection, mortality, or graft loss rates. Better graft function was observed using MMF/MPA-CNI than using mTORi + CNI, but this difference was not evident when the mTORi was associated with reduced dose CNI in more recent studies with everolimus. Dyslipidemia, lymphoceles, and impaired wound healing were more frequent with mTORi-CNI and diarrhea and leukopenia were more frequent with MMF/MPA-CNI. Viral infections at any time and malignant neoplasia beyond 2 years were less frequent with mTORi-CNI. Rates of discontinuation because of adverse effects in the mTORi groups varied between 17% and 46% compared to 0%-26.6% in MMF/MPA groups. The current use of lower mTORi dosage has decreased the discontinuation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy is similar with mTORi + CNI and MMF/MPA-CNI. The safety profile is the predominant difference between the 2 regimens.

摘要

背景

目前肾移植(KT)的标准治疗免疫抑制方案包括霉酚酸酯(MMF/MPA)与钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)的联合应用。

方法

我们设计了一项系统评价,纳入了所有评估 mTORi+CNI 与包含 MMF/MPA 或硫唑嘌呤与 CNI 的方案在 KT 受者中的结局的随机临床试验(RCT)。

结果

共纳入 24 项研究,涉及 7356 名参与者。mTORi-CNI 与 MMF/MPA-CNI 比较,在急性排斥反应、死亡率或移植物丢失率方面无差异。与 mTORi+CNI 相比,MMF/MPA-CNI 观察到更好的移植物功能,但在最近的研究中,当 mTORi 与 CNI 剂量减少相关时,这种差异并不明显,研究中使用了依维莫司。mTORi-CNI 更常出现血脂异常、淋巴囊肿和伤口愈合受损,MMF/MPA-CNI 更常出现腹泻和白细胞减少。mTORi-CNI 任何时间的病毒感染和 2 年后的恶性肿瘤发生率较低。与 MMF/MPA 组的 0%-26.6%相比,mTORi 组因不良反应停药的发生率为 17%-46%。目前使用较低剂量的 mTORi 已降低了停药率。

结论

mTORi+CNI 与 MMF/MPA-CNI 的疗效相似。两种方案的主要差异在于安全性特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验