Fjær Erlend L, Balaj Mirza, Stornes Per, Todd Adam, McNamara Courtney L, Eikemo Terje A
Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Division of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):73-81. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw255.
Low socioeconomic position (SEP) tends to be linked to higher use of general practitioners (GPs), while the use of health care specialists is more common in higher SEPs. Despite extensive literature in this area, previous studies have, however, only studied health care use by income or education. The aim of this study is, therefore, to examine inequalities in GP and health care specialist use by four social markers that may be linked to health care utilization (educational level, occupational status, level of financial strain and size and frequency of social networks) across 20 European countries and Israel.
Logistic regression models were employed using data from the seventh round of the European Social Survey; this study focused upon people aged 25–75 years, across 21 countries. Health care utilization was measured according to self-reported use of GP or specialist care within 12 months. Analyses tested four social markers: income (financial strain), occupational status, education and social networks.
We observed a cross-national tendency that countries with higher or equal probability of GP utilization by lower SEP groups had a more consistent probability of specialist use among high SEP groups. Moreover, countries with inequalities in GP use in favour of high SEP groups had comparable levels of inequalities in specialist care utilization. This was the case for three social markers (education, occupational class and social networks), while the pattern was less pronounced for income (financial strain).
There are significant inequalities associated with GP and specialist health care use across Europe—with higher SEP groups more likely to use health care specialists, compared with lower SEP groups. In the context of health care specialist use, education and occupation appear to be particularly important factors.
社会经济地位较低往往与更多地使用全科医生相关,而在社会经济地位较高的人群中,使用医疗保健专科医生更为常见。尽管该领域有大量文献,但以往的研究仅通过收入或教育程度来研究医疗保健的使用情况。因此,本研究的目的是通过四个可能与医疗保健利用相关的社会指标(教育水平、职业地位、经济压力程度以及社交网络的规模和频率),对20个欧洲国家和以色列的全科医生和医疗保健专科医生的使用不平等情况进行研究。
使用来自第七轮欧洲社会调查的数据建立逻辑回归模型;本研究聚焦于21个国家中25至75岁的人群。根据自我报告的12个月内使用全科医生或专科护理的情况来衡量医疗保健利用情况。分析测试了四个社会指标:收入(经济压力)、职业地位、教育程度和社交网络。
我们观察到一种跨国趋势,即社会经济地位较低群体使用全科医生概率较高或相同的国家,社会经济地位较高群体使用专科医生的概率更为一致。此外,全科医生使用存在有利于社会经济地位较高群体的不平等的国家,专科护理利用方面的不平等程度相当。三个社会指标(教育程度、职业阶层和社交网络)的情况都是如此,而收入(经济压力)方面的模式则不太明显。
在欧洲,全科医生和专科医疗保健的使用存在显著不平等——与社会经济地位较低的群体相比,社会经济地位较高的群体更有可能使用医疗保健专科医生。在使用医疗保健专科医生的背景下,教育和职业似乎是特别重要的因素。