Ekels Afke, van de Poll-Franse Lonneke V, Issa Djamila E, Oosterveld Margriet, van der Griend René, Hoogendoorn Mels, Koster Adrianus, Nijziel Marten R, Arts Lindy P J, Posthuma Eduardus F M, Oerlemans Simone
Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s11764-024-01676-2.
To investigate health care utilization among patients with hematologic malignancies and its association with socioeconomic position (SEP) and compare health care utilization with a cancer-free population.
Patients with aggressive lymphoma, indolent lymphoma, or multiple myeloma (MM), diagnosed between 1999-2010 and 2015-2019, participated in longitudinal patient-reported outcome research, up to 11 years post-diagnosis. Questionnaires assessed health care utilization at the general practitioner (GP), medical specialist, and additional health care. SEP was based on education and income, categorized as low, medium, or high. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Mixed models and logistic regression analyses were performed.
The study included 2319 patients (71% response rate), who completed on average five measurements. Patients with MM reported the highest health care utilization, both at the GP and medical specialist. Low SEP was associated with higher utilization at the GP (medium education β = - 0.72, p = 0.01; high education β = - 1.15, p < 0.001) and lower utilization of additional physical (OR = 1.7, p = 0.01) and psychosocial (OR = 1.5, p < 0.05) care, among all patients. For patients with MM, high SEP was also associated with higher utilization of health care at the medical specialist (high education β = 2.56, p < 0.05).
Hematologic malignancy-related and SEP-related disparities in health care utilization were observed. To ensure equal access to health consumption, attention is needed for patients with a low SEP to provide better guidance in their cancer (survivorship) care.
Improving health literacy and involving informal caregivers and nurse-led patient navigation may help reduce disparities in access to (additional) health care.
调查血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的医疗保健利用情况及其与社会经济地位(SEP)的关联,并将其医疗保健利用情况与无癌症人群进行比较。
1999年至2010年以及2015年至2019年期间诊断为侵袭性淋巴瘤、惰性淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的患者参与了长达诊断后11年的纵向患者报告结局研究。问卷评估了在全科医生(GP)、医学专科医生处以及其他医疗保健方面的医疗保健利用情况。SEP基于教育程度和收入,分为低、中、高三个类别。社会人口统计学和临床数据来自荷兰癌症登记处。进行了混合模型和逻辑回归分析。
该研究纳入了2319名患者(应答率为71%),他们平均完成了五次测量。MM患者在GP和医学专科医生处的医疗保健利用情况报告最高。在所有患者中,低SEP与在GP处更高的利用率相关(中等教育程度β = -0.72,p = 0.01;高等教育程度β = -1.15,p < 0.001),以及在其他身体(OR = 1.7,p = 0.01)和心理社会(OR = 1.5,p < 0.05)护理方面较低的利用率。对于MM患者,高SEP也与在医学专科医生处更高的医疗保健利用率相关(高等教育程度β = 2.56,p < 0.05)。
观察到了血液系统恶性肿瘤相关和SEP相关的医疗保健利用差异。为确保平等的健康消费机会,需要关注低SEP患者,以便在其癌症(生存)护理中提供更好的指导。
提高健康素养并让非正式护理人员参与以及由护士主导患者导航可能有助于减少获得(额外)医疗保健方面的差异。