Xu Liyue, Han Fang, Keenan Brendan T, Kneeland-Szanto Elizabeth, Yan Han, Dong Xiaosong, Chang Yuan, Zhao Long, Zhang Xueli, Li Jing, Pack Allan I, Kuna Samuel T
PKU-UPenn Sleep Center, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2017 May 15;13(5):675-683. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6582.
To evaluate the performance of a portable monitor (Nox-T3, Nox Medical Inc. Reykjavik, Iceland) used to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea in Chinese adults.
Eighty Chinese adults (mean ± standard deviation age 47.6 ± 14.0 years, 77.5% males, body mass index 27.5 ± 5.4 kg/m) underwent overnight, unattended home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) with the Nox-T3 portable monitor followed by an overnight in-laboratory polysomnogram (PSG) with simultaneous portable monitor recording. The portable monitor recordings were scored using automated analysis and then manually edited using different criteria for scoring hypopneas. Polysomnography was scored based on recommended guidelines.
When scoring of hypopneas required a ≥ 4% oxygen desaturation event, the mean ± standard deviation apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 24.4 ± 20.8 events/h on HSAT, 28.0 ± 22.9 events/h on in-laboratory portable monitor recording, and 28.6 ± 23.9 events/h on PSG ( < .0001). Bland-Altman analysis of AHI on PSG versus HSAT showed a mean difference (95% confidence interval) of -4.64 (-7.15, -2.13); limits of agreement (equal to ± 2 standard deviations) was -26.62 to 17.35 events/h. Based on a threshold of AHI ≥ 5 events/h, HSAT had 95% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 94% positive predictive value, and 75% negative predictive value compared to PSG. Using an AHI ≥ 15 events/h, HSAT had 93% sensitivity, 85% specificity, 89% positive predictive value, and 91% negative predictive value. Closer agreements were present when comparing the simultaneous recordings. Similar results were obtained using different scoring criteria for hypopneas.
Despite known differences between HSAT and PSG, the results show close agreement between the two diagnostic tests in Chinese adults, especially when controlling for night-to-night variability and changes in sleeping environment.
评估一款用于诊断中国成年人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的便携式监测仪(Nox-T3,冰岛雷克雅未克Nox Medical公司)的性能。
80名中国成年人(平均年龄±标准差47.6±14.0岁,男性占77.5%,体重指数27.5±5.4kg/m)使用Nox-T3便携式监测仪进行了无人值守的家庭睡眠呼吸暂停检测(HSAT),随后进行了整夜实验室多导睡眠图(PSG)检查,并同步记录便携式监测仪数据。便携式监测仪记录的数据先通过自动分析进行评分,然后根据不同的低通气评分标准进行人工编辑。多导睡眠图根据推荐指南进行评分。
当低通气评分要求氧饱和度下降事件≥4%时,HSAT的平均±标准差呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)为24.4±20.8次/小时,实验室便携式监测仪记录为28.0±22.9次/小时,PSG为28.6±23.9次/小时(P<.0001)。PSG与HSAT的AHI的Bland-Altman分析显示平均差异(95%置信区间)为-4.64(-7.15,-2.13);一致性界限(等于±2个标准差)为-26.62至17.35次/小时。以AHI≥5次/小时为阈值,与PSG相比,HSAT的敏感性为95%,特异性为69%,阳性预测值为94%,阴性预测值为75%。使用AHI≥15次/小时,HSAT的敏感性为93%,特异性为85%,阳性预测值为89%,阴性预测值为91%。比较同步记录时一致性更高。使用不同的低通气评分标准也得到了类似结果。
尽管已知HSAT和PSG之间存在差异,但结果显示这两种诊断测试在中国成年人中一致性较高,尤其是在控制夜间变异性和睡眠环境变化时。