• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

获取活体器官捐赠是否应该以感恩为条件?

Should gratitude be a requirement for access to live organ donation?

机构信息

Clinical Ethics Council, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Pain and Palliative Care Consultation, Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2017 Nov;43(11):762-765. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103698. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2016-103698
PMID:28356491
Abstract

Gratitude is both expected and problematic in live organ donation. Are there grounds to require it, and to forbid access to live donor transplantation to a recipient who fails to signal that he feels any form of gratitude? Recipient gratitude is not currently required for organ donation, but it is expected and may be a moral requirement. Despite this, we argue that making it a condition for live organ transplantation would be unjustified. It would constitute a problematic and disproportionate punishment for perceived immoral behaviour on the part of the recipient. It would also bar the donor from positive aspects of organ donation that remain even in the absence of recipient gratitude. A potential recipient's lack of gratitude should be explored as a possible symptom of other morally problematic issues and integrated into the information provided to the potential donor. Recognition of the donor's gift and gratitude for it may also need to be expressed in part by others. This last aspect is relevant even in cases where the recipient feels and expresses gratitude.

摘要

感激之情在活体器官捐献中既被期待又存在问题。是否有理由要求接受者表示感激,并禁止未能表现出任何形式感激之情的接受者接受活体捐献者的移植?目前,器官捐赠并不要求接受者表示感激,但人们期望接受者表示感激,并且感激可能是一种道德要求。尽管如此,我们认为将其作为活体器官移植的条件是不合理的。这将构成对接受者被认为不道德行为的有问题和不成比例的惩罚。这也将使捐献者无法获得即使在没有接受者感激的情况下仍然存在的器官捐献的积极方面。应该将潜在接受者缺乏感激之情视为其他道德问题的可能症状,并将其纳入向潜在捐献者提供的信息中。对捐献者的礼物的认可和感激也可能需要由其他人来表达。即使接受者感到并表达了感激之情,最后这一方面也是相关的。

相似文献

1
Should gratitude be a requirement for access to live organ donation?获取活体器官捐赠是否应该以感恩为条件?
J Med Ethics. 2017 Nov;43(11):762-765. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103698. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
2
The ethics surrounding HIV, kidney donation and patient confidentiality.围绕艾滋病病毒、肾脏捐赠和患者保密的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr;35(4):270-1. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024695.
3
Expanding the live kidney donor pool: ethical considerations regarding altruistic donors, paired and pooled programs.扩大活体肾供体库:关于利他性供体、配对和集中项目的伦理考量
Exp Clin Transplant. 2011 Jun;9(3):181-6.
4
Giving until it hurts?: Altruistic donation of solid organs.付出直至心痛?:实体器官的利他性捐赠
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(3):377-9.
5
The challenge of informed consent for increased risk living donation and transplantation.增加风险的知情同意在活体捐赠和移植中的挑战。
Am J Transplant. 2011 Dec;11(12):2569-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03814.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
6
Attitudes to sharing personal health information in living kidney donation.活体肾脏捐献中个人健康信息共享态度的研究
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Apr;5(4):717-22. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06130809. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
7
Ethical issues relating to renal transplantation from prediabetic living donor.与糖尿病前期活体供体肾移植相关的伦理问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Jun 16;15:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-45.
8
Ethical issues in live donor kidney transplant: views of medical and nursing staff.活体供肾移植中的伦理问题:医护人员的观点
Exp Clin Transplant. 2009 Mar;7(1):1-7.
9
Risk Taking and Decision Making in Kidney Paired Donation: A Qualitative Study by Semistructured Interviews.肾移植配对捐赠中的风险承担与决策制定:一项通过半结构化访谈进行的定性研究
Transplant Proc. 2018 Jun;50(5):1227-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.079. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
10
From blood donation to kidney sales: the gift relationship and transplant commercialism.从献血到肾脏买卖:赠予关系与移植商业化
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015 Jun-Sep;33(2-3):102-22. doi: 10.1007/s40592-015-0035-x.