• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Predictive validity of the qSOFA criteria for sepsis in non-ICU inpatients.

作者信息

Forward Emily, Konecny Pamela, Burston John, Adhikari Suman, Doolan Heather, Jensen Tomas

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Immunology and Sexual Health, St George Hospital, 2 South Street, Sydney, NSW, 2217, Australia.

St George & Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jun;43(6):945-946. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4776-2. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-017-4776-2
PMID:28357459
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Predictive validity of the qSOFA criteria for sepsis in non-ICU inpatients.qSOFA标准对非重症监护病房住院患者脓毒症的预测效度
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jun;43(6):945-946. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4776-2. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
2
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit.快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征及早期预警评分用于检测重症监护病房以外感染患者的临床病情恶化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.
3
Use of CRB-65 and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment to predict site of care and mortality in pneumonia patients in the emergency department: a retrospective study.应用CRB-65和快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估预测急诊科肺炎患者的治疗地点和死亡率：一项回顾性研究
Crit Care. 2016 Jun 1;20(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1351-0.
4
Validation of the new Sepsis-3 definitions: proposal for improvement in early risk identification.新Sepsis-3 定义的验证：提高早期风险识别能力的建议。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Feb;23(2):104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
5
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.
6
Assessment of mortality by qSOFA in patients with sepsis outside ICU: A post hoc subgroup analysis by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Sepsis Registry Study Group.非重症监护病房脓毒症患者中采用qSOFA评估死亡率：日本急性医学协会脓毒症注册研究组的事后亚组分析
J Infect Chemother. 2017 Nov;23(11):757-762. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
7
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
8
Validation of the qSOFA score for identification of septic patients: A retrospective study.用于识别脓毒症患者的qSOFA评分的验证：一项回顾性研究。
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Dec;36:e35-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
9
Frequency and significance of qSOFA criteria during adult rapid response team reviews: A prospective cohort study.qSOFA 标准在成人快速反应团队评估期间的频率和意义：一项前瞻性队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jan;122:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.11.036. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
10
Diagnosing Sepsis: qSOFA is Not the Tool We're Looking For.诊断脓毒症：快速序贯器官衰竭评估并非我们要找的工具。
Am J Med. 2020 Mar;133(3):265-266. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.07.048. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of different versions of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients: A retrospective observational study.不同版本快速序贯器官功能衰竭评估对预测脓毒症患者院内死亡率的比较：一项回顾性观察研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(2):114-119. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.027.
2
Referral to immediate postoperative care in an intensive care unit from the perspective of anesthesiologists, surgeons, and intensive care physicians: a cross-sectional questionnaire.从麻醉师、外科医生和重症监护医生的角度来看，将患者转至重症监护病房进行术后即刻治疗：一项横断面问卷调查。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021 May-Jun;71(3):265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.
2
The new definitions of SEPSIS and SEPTIC SHOCK: What do they give us? An answer.
Med Intensiva. 2017 Jan-Feb;41(1):41-43. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.10.015. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估：针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》（Sepsis-3）。
Contrasting qSOFA and SIRS Criteria for Early Sepsis Identification in a Veteran Population.
对比qSOFA和SIRS标准在退伍军人人群中早期识别脓毒症的效果
Fed Pract. 2019 Mar;36(Suppl 2):S21-S24.
4
Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment as a prognostic factor for infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估作为重症监护室外感染患者的预后因素：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;14(4):603-615. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02036-0. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
5
qSOFA is a Poor Predictor of Short-Term Mortality in All Patients: A Systematic Review of 410,000 Patients.qSOFA对所有患者短期死亡率的预测能力较差：对410,000例患者的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):61. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010061.
6
Comparison of Prognostic Accuracy of the quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment between Short- & Long-term Mortality in Patients Presenting Outside of the Intensive Care Unit - A Systematic Review & Meta-analysis.快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估在 ICU 外就诊患者的短期和长期死亡率预后准确性比较 - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 12;8(1):16698. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35144-6.
7
qSOFA score not predictive of in-hospital mortality in emergency patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.qSOFA评分不能预测失代偿期肝硬化急诊患者的院内死亡率。
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019 Nov;114(8):724-732. doi: 10.1007/s00063-018-0477-z. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
8
Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock.拯救脓毒症运动：脓毒症和脓毒性休克的研究重点。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1400-1426. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5175-z. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
9
Performance of the quick Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment score as a prognostic tool in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分在重症监护室外感染患者中的预后工具性能：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Feb 6;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1952-x.
10
Utility of quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment (qSOFA) to predict outcome in patients with pneumonia.快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估（qSOFA）对预测肺炎患者预后的效用。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):e0188913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188913. eCollection 2017.
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
4
Incidence and Prognostic Value of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Organ Dysfunctions in Ward Patients.病房患者全身炎症反应综合征和器官功能障碍的发生率及预后价值
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct 15;192(8):958-64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0275OC.