Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora.
Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Nov 9;3(11):e170231. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0231.
Men with metastatic prostate cancer who have a poor response to initial androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), as reflected by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level higher than 4.0 ng/mL after 7 months of ADT, have a poor prognosis, based on historical controls.
To determine the efficacy of abiraterone acetate with prednisone in these high-risk patients with a suboptimal response to hormonal induction.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A phase 2 single-arm study was conducted through the National Clinical Trials Network-Southwest Oncology Group. Eligible patients had metastatic prostate cancer and a PSA level higher than 4.0 ng/mL between 6 and 12 months after starting ADT. The PSA level could be rising or falling at the time of enrollment, but had to be higher than 4.0 ng/mL. No previous chemotherapy or secondary hormonal therapies were allowed, except in patients receiving a standard, first-generation antiandrogen agent with a falling PSA level at the time of enrollment; this therapy was continued in this cohort. Abiraterone acetate, 1000 mg, once daily with prednisone, 5 mg, twice daily was administered to all participants. A total of 41 men were enrolled between the trial's activation on August 9, 2011, and closure on August 1, 2013. Data analysis was conducted from March 21 to November 29, 2016.
Abiraterone acetate, 1000 mg, once daily by mouth with prednisone, 5 mg, by mouth twice daily.
The primary end point was a PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL or lower within 12 months of starting abiraterone acetate plus prednisone. A partial response (PR) was a secondary end point, defined as a PSA level reduction to lower than 4.0 ng/mL but higher than 0.2 ng/mL.
Of the 41 men enrolled, 1 did not receive any protocol treatment and was excluded from analysis. The median (range) age of the 40 participants was 66 (39-85) years. Five (13%) patients achieved a PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL or lower (95% CI, 4%-27%). Thirteen (33%) additional patients achieved a partial response, with a reduction in the PSA level to lower than 4.0 ng/mL but higher than 0.2 ng/mL. Sixteen (40%) patients had no PSA response and 6 (15%) were not assessable and assumed to be nonresponders. The median progression-free survival was 17.5 months (95% CI, 8.6-25.0 months) and the median overall survival was 25.8 months (95% CI, 15.7-25.8 months). There was 1 incident each of grade 4 adverse events of alanine aminotransferase level elevation and rectal hemorrhage. Eleven patients reported grade 3 adverse events.
This study did not reach its prescribed level of 6 PSA responses of 0.2 ng/mL or lower, although 5 responses were observed. The overall survival and progression-free survival rates observed in this trial are encouraging compared with historical controls. The therapy was generally well tolerated, without any clear signal of any unexpected adverse effects.
根据历史对照,对于初始雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)反应不佳的转移性前列腺癌患者(PSA 水平在 ADT 后 7 个月高于 4.0ng/mL),预后较差。
确定醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松在这些对激素诱导反应不佳的高危患者中的疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项通过国家临床试验网络-西南肿瘤组进行的 2 期单臂研究。符合条件的患者患有转移性前列腺癌,并且在开始 ADT 后 6-12 个月时 PSA 水平高于 4.0ng/mL。PSA 水平在入组时可以升高或降低,但必须高于 4.0ng/mL。不允许进行先前的化疗或二线激素治疗,但在入组时 PSA 水平下降的患者中允许使用标准的第一代抗雄激素药物;在这一队列中继续使用这种治疗方法。所有参与者均给予醋酸阿比特龙 1000mg,每日一次,泼尼松 5mg,每日两次。2011 年 8 月 9 日试验启动至 2013 年 8 月 1 日关闭期间共纳入 41 名男性。数据分析于 2016 年 3 月 21 日至 11 月 29 日进行。
醋酸阿比特龙,1000mg,每日口服一次,泼尼松,5mg,每日口服两次。
主要终点是开始使用醋酸阿比特龙联合泼尼松后 12 个月内 PSA 水平达到 0.2ng/mL 或更低。部分缓解(PR)是次要终点,定义为 PSA 水平下降至低于 4.0ng/mL 但高于 0.2ng/mL。
41 名入组患者中,1 名未接受任何方案治疗,被排除在分析之外。40 名参与者的中位(范围)年龄为 66(39-85)岁。5 名(13%)患者 PSA 水平达到 0.2ng/mL 或更低(95%CI,4%-27%)。另外 13 名(33%)患者达到部分缓解,PSA 水平降至低于 4.0ng/mL 但高于 0.2ng/mL。16 名(40%)患者无 PSA 反应,6 名(15%)无法评估,假设为无反应者。中位无进展生存期为 17.5 个月(95%CI,8.6-25.0 个月),中位总生存期为 25.8 个月(95%CI,15.7-25.8 个月)。各有 1 例 4 级不良事件(丙氨酸氨基转移酶水平升高和直肠出血)和 11 例 3 级不良事件。
尽管观察到 5 次反应,但本研究未达到规定的 6 次 PSA 反应达到 0.2ng/mL 或更低的水平。与历史对照相比,本试验观察到的总生存和无进展生存率令人鼓舞。该治疗方法总体耐受性良好,没有任何明显的意外不良影响信号。