Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, 80 Meiers Road, Dianella Building, Room 216, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia.
Turning Point, Eastern Health, 54-62 Gertrude Street, Fitzroy, 3065, Australia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 May;43:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
According to the most recent statistics from the World Health Organization, 1.2 million people die or are injured on the world's roads every year. Drink-driving continues to be a major risk factor for road traffic crashes, with 22% of serious road injuries (SRIs) in Victoria involving a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) equal to or above the legal driving limit of 0.05g/mL. Use of police and hospital data to determine alcohol involvement in SRIs is not reliable, with researchers using proxy measures such as high alcohol hours (HAH). This paper examines patterns of alcohol-related SRIs based on reported BAC versus the surrogate HAH measure.
Trends over a 10year period (2000-2010) were examined, comparing four different SRI rates (low alcohol hours (LAH), LAH with positive BAC, HAH, HAH with positive BAC). Discontinuities in the data series were also examined. SRI data were drawn from the Road Networks Database of VicRoads containing information on all reported road crashes in Victoria.
For the 10year period there were 52,286 reported SRIs relating to the driver. Of the incidents where a driver's reading was recorded, 44% had a recorded BAC exceeding Victoria's legal limit of 0.05% and a further 23% had a BAC below the legal limit. During the period over 17,000 (or 34%) SRIs occurred during HAH. Where a BAC had been recorded during HAH, almost 60% exceeded the legal limit and a further 20% had some positive recording of BAC. Where SRI drivers had a recorded BAC during LAH, 58% had a positive BAC (31% with a BAC over the legal limit). While it is likely that an SRI occurring during HAH will be associated with a positive BAC (80%), of which 60% will be above the legal limit, almost 60% of SRIs during LAH had a positive BAC, with 31% above the legal limit.
There was no significant change in overall alcohol-related SRI rates between 2000 and 2010, suggesting that policies and procedures implemented to decrease drink-driving have not reduced alcohol-related SRI rates. In the absence of a reliable direct measure (i.e., BAC readings) this paper demonstrated the utility of the surrogate HAH measure for determining changes in alcohol-related serious road injuries. Further, the unmet need for routine BAC testing in SRIs occurring during LAH requires further exploration given the significant proportion of SRIs involving positive BAC during these times.
根据世界卫生组织最近的统计数据,全球每年有 120 万人死于或因道路交通事故受伤。酒后驾车仍然是道路交通事故的一个主要风险因素,在维多利亚州的严重道路伤害(SRIs)中,有 22%涉及血液酒精浓度(BAC)等于或高于 0.05g/mL 的法定驾驶限制。使用警察和医院数据来确定酒精在 SRIs 中的参与情况并不可靠,研究人员使用高酒精时间(HAH)等替代指标。本文根据报告的 BAC 与替代 HAH 测量值,检查与酒精相关的 SRIs 的模式。
在 10 年期间(2000-2010 年)进行了趋势比较,比较了四种不同的 SRI 发生率(低酒精时间(LAH)、LAH 阳性 BAC、HAH、HAH 阳性 BAC)。还检查了数据系列的不连续性。SRI 数据取自 VicRoads 的道路网络数据库,其中包含维多利亚州所有报告的道路事故信息。
在 10 年期间,有 52286 例与驾驶员有关的报告 SRIs。在记录驾驶员读数的事件中,44%的读数超过了维多利亚州 0.05%的法定限制,另有 23%的读数低于法定限制。在这段时间里,超过 17000 人(或 34%)发生了 HAH 期间的 SRI。在 HAH 期间记录 BAC 的情况下,近 60%的 SRI 超过了法定限制,另有 20%的 SRI 有一定的 BAC 阳性记录。在 LAH 期间记录了 SRI 驾驶员 BAC 的情况下,58%的 SRI 有阳性 BAC(31%的 BAC 超过法定限制)。虽然 HAH 期间发生的 SRI 很可能与阳性 BAC 相关(80%),其中 60%将超过法定限制,但 LAH 期间近 60%的 SRI 有阳性 BAC,其中 31%超过法定限制。
2000 年至 2010 年间,与酒精相关的 SRI 发生率总体没有显著变化,这表明为减少酒后驾车而实施的政策和程序并未降低与酒精相关的 SRI 发生率。在没有可靠的直接测量方法(即 BAC 读数)的情况下,本文证明了替代 HAH 测量方法在确定与酒精相关的严重道路伤害变化方面的实用性。此外,鉴于 LAH 期间发生的 SRI 中涉及阳性 BAC 的比例很大,因此需要进一步探讨在 LAH 期间发生的 SRI 中常规 BAC 测试的未满足需求。