Suppr超能文献

医疗管理数据库中心血管和脑血管ICD-9-CM编码验证方案:翁布里亚数据价值项目

Protocol for validating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases: the Umbria Data Value Project.

作者信息

Cozzolino Francesco, Abraha Iosief, Orso Massimiliano, Mengoni Anna, Cerasa Maria Francesca, Eusebi Paolo, Ambrosio Giuseppe, Montedori Alessandro

机构信息

Health Planning Service, Regional Health Authority of Umbria, Perugia, Italy.

Division of Cardiology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia School of Medicine, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 29;7(3):e013785. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013785.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Administrative healthcare databases can provide a comprehensive assessment of the burden of diseases in terms of major outcomes, such as mortality, hospital readmissions and use of healthcare resources, thus providing answers to a wide spectrum of research questions. However, a crucial issue is the reliability of information gathered. Aim of this protocol is to validate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for major cardiovascular diseases, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Data from the centralised administrative database of the entire Umbria Region (910 000 residents, located in Central Italy) will be considered. Patients with a first hospital discharge for AMI, HF, AF or stroke, between 2012 and 2014, will be identified in the administrative database using the following groups of ICD-9-CM codes located in primary position: (1) 410.x for AMI; (2) 427.31 for AF; (3) 428 for HF; (4) 433.x1, 434 (excluding 434.x0), 436 for ischaemic stroke, 430 and 431 for haemorrhagic stroke (subarachnoid haemorrhage and intracerebral haemorrhage). A random sample of cases, and of non-cases, will be selected, and the corresponding medical charts retrieved and reviewed for validation by pairs of trained, independent reviewers. For each condition considered, case adjudication of disease will be based on symptoms, laboratory and diagnostic tests, as available in medical charts. Divergences will be resolved by consensus. Sensitivity and specificity with 95% CIs will be calculated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Research protocol has been granted approval by the Regional Ethics Committee. Study results will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.

摘要

引言

行政医疗保健数据库能够根据主要结局,如死亡率、医院再入院率和医疗资源使用情况,对疾病负担进行全面评估,从而为广泛的研究问题提供答案。然而,一个关键问题是所收集信息的可靠性。本方案的目的是验证国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD-9-CM)编码用于主要心血管疾病,包括急性心肌梗死(AMI)、心力衰竭(HF)、心房颤动(AF)和中风。

方法与分析

将考虑来自意大利中部翁布里亚地区整个集中行政数据库的数据(91万居民)。2012年至2014年期间,首次因AMI、HF、AF或中风出院的患者将在行政数据库中使用位于首位的以下几组ICD-9-CM编码进行识别:(1)AMI为410.x;(2)AF为427.31;(3)HF为428;(4)缺血性中风为433.x1、434(不包括434.x0)、436,出血性中风(蛛网膜下腔出血和脑出血)为430和431。将选取病例和非病例的随机样本,并检索相应的病历,由经过培训的独立评审员对进行成对评审以进行验证。对于每种考虑的疾病,疾病的病例判定将基于病历中可用的症状、实验室检查和诊断测试。分歧将通过协商一致解决。将计算95%置信区间的敏感性和特异性。

伦理与传播

研究方案已获得地区伦理委员会的批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物以及在国内和国际会议上的报告广泛传播。

相似文献

4
Validity of cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases. The Umbria Data-Value Project.
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 9;15(1):e0227653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227653. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a Case Definition to Identify Patients Diagnosed With Cardiovascular Disease in Canadian Primary Care Practices.
CJC Open. 2023 Apr 22;5(7):567-576. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.04.003. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Suboptimal Cardiology Follow-Up Among Patients With and Without Cancer Hospitalized for Heart Failure.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Jun 1;196:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.02.030. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
3
Identification of Health Expenditures Determinants: A Model to Manage the Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Disease.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094652.
5
Relation of a Simple Cardiac Co-Morbidity Count and Cardiovascular Readmission After a Heart Failure Hospitalization.
Am J Cardiol. 2020 May 15;125(10):1529-1535. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
7
Validity of cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases. The Umbria Data-Value Project.
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 9;15(1):e0227653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227653. eCollection 2020.
10
Accuracy of administrative databases in detecting primary breast cancer diagnoses: a systematic review.
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 23;8(7):e019264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019264.

本文引用的文献

5
Validity of Diagnostic Codes for Acute Stroke in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 20;10(8):e0135834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135834. eCollection 2015.
6
Validity of heart failure diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):e104519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104519. eCollection 2014.
7
Validity of myocardial infarction diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 28;9(3):e92286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092286. eCollection 2014.
9
Validation of healthcare administrative data for the diagnosis of epilepsy.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Dec 1;67(12):1019-24. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202528. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验