• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Protocol for validating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases: the Umbria Data Value Project.医疗管理数据库中心血管和脑血管ICD-9-CM编码验证方案:翁布里亚数据价值项目
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 29;7(3):e013785. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013785.
2
A diagnostic accuracy study validating cardiovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases. The Umbria Data-Value Project.一项验证心血管 ICD-9-CM 代码在医疗保健管理数据库中的诊断准确性的研究。翁布里亚数据价值项目。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 8;14(7):e0218919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218919. eCollection 2019.
3
Validity of ICD-9-CM codes for breast, lung and colorectal cancers in three Italian administrative healthcare databases: a diagnostic accuracy study protocol.意大利三个行政医疗保健数据库中乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌的ICD-9-CM编码的有效性:一项诊断准确性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 25;6(3):e010547. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010547.
4
Validity of cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases. The Umbria Data-Value Project.脑血管 ICD-9-CM 代码在医疗保健管理数据库中的有效性。翁布里亚数据价值项目。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 9;15(1):e0227653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227653. eCollection 2020.
5
Accuracy of lung cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Umbria, Napoli 3 Sud and Friuli Venezia Giulia administrative healthcare databases: a diagnostic accuracy study.乌姆比亚、那不勒斯 3 南和弗留利-威尼斯朱利亚行政医疗保健数据库中肺癌 ICD-9-CM 代码的准确性:一项诊断准确性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 17;8(5):e020628. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020628.
6
Accuracy of ICD-9 codes in identifying patients with peptic ulcer and gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the regional healthcare administrative database of Umbria.乌姆比亚地区医疗保健管理数据库中 ICD-9 编码识别消化性溃疡和胃肠道出血患者的准确性。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235714. eCollection 2020.
7
Accuracy of colorectal cancer ICD-9-CM codes in Italian administrative healthcare databases: a cross-sectional diagnostic study.意大利行政医疗保健数据库中结直肠癌ICD-9-CM编码的准确性:一项横断面诊断研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 5;8(7):e020630. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020630.
8
Chart validation of inpatient ICD-9-CM administrative diagnosis codes for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) among intravenous immune globulin (IGIV) users in the Sentinel Distributed Database.哨兵分布式数据库中静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IGIV)使用者急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院ICD-9-CM行政诊断代码的图表验证。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):398-404. doi: 10.1002/pds.4398. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
9
Validating malignant melanoma ICD-9-CM codes in Umbria, ASL Napoli 3 Sud and Friuli Venezia Giulia administrative healthcare databases: a diagnostic accuracy study.在翁布里亚、那不勒斯南部地区卫生局3(ASL Napoli 3 Sud)和弗留利-威尼斯朱利亚行政区医疗保健数据库中验证恶性黑色素瘤ICD-9-CM编码:一项诊断准确性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 20;8(4):e020631. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020631.
10
Sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer ICD-9-CM codes in three Italian administrative healthcare databases: a diagnostic accuracy study.意大利三个行政医疗保健数据库中乳腺癌ICD-9-CM编码的敏感性和特异性:一项诊断准确性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 23;8(7):e020627. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020627.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of a Case Definition to Identify Patients Diagnosed With Cardiovascular Disease in Canadian Primary Care Practices.用于识别加拿大初级保健机构中确诊为心血管疾病患者的病例定义的验证
CJC Open. 2023 Apr 22;5(7):567-576. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.04.003. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Suboptimal Cardiology Follow-Up Among Patients With and Without Cancer Hospitalized for Heart Failure.心力衰竭住院患者中伴有和不伴有癌症患者的心脏科随访情况不佳。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Jun 1;196:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.02.030. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
3
Identification of Health Expenditures Determinants: A Model to Manage the Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Disease.确定卫生支出决定因素:管理心血管疾病经济负担的模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094652.
4
Accuracy of ICD-9 codes in identifying patients with peptic ulcer and gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the regional healthcare administrative database of Umbria.乌姆比亚地区医疗保健管理数据库中 ICD-9 编码识别消化性溃疡和胃肠道出血患者的准确性。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235714. eCollection 2020.
5
Relation of a Simple Cardiac Co-Morbidity Count and Cardiovascular Readmission After a Heart Failure Hospitalization.心力衰竭住院后简单心脏合并症计数与心血管再入院的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 May 15;125(10):1529-1535. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
6
Predicting the Risk of Ischemic Stroke among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Using a Simplified RA-CHADSV Score Based on the CHADS-VASc Score.基于 CHADS-VASc 评分的简化 RA-CHADSV 评分预测类风湿关节炎患者缺血性脑卒中风险。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Feb 12;56(2):73. doi: 10.3390/medicina56020073.
7
Validity of cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases. The Umbria Data-Value Project.脑血管 ICD-9-CM 代码在医疗保健管理数据库中的有效性。翁布里亚数据价值项目。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 9;15(1):e0227653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227653. eCollection 2020.
8
A diagnostic accuracy study validating cardiovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases. The Umbria Data-Value Project.一项验证心血管 ICD-9-CM 代码在医疗保健管理数据库中的诊断准确性的研究。翁布里亚数据价值项目。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 8;14(7):e0218919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218919. eCollection 2019.
9
Processing of Electronic Medical Records for Health Services Research in an Academic Medical Center: Methods and Validation.学术医疗中心用于卫生服务研究的电子病历处理:方法与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Dec 21;6(4):e10933. doi: 10.2196/10933.
10
Accuracy of administrative databases in detecting primary breast cancer diagnoses: a systematic review.利用行政数据库诊断原发性乳腺癌的准确性:系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 23;8(7):e019264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019264.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity of peptic ulcer disease and upper gastrointestinal bleeding diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review protocol.行政数据库中消化性溃疡疾病和上消化道出血诊断的有效性:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 15;6(9):e011776. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011776.
2
Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnoses in healthcare databases: a systematic review protocol.医疗保健数据库中慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)诊断的验证:一项系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 1;6(6):e011777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011777.
3
Validity of ICD-9-CM codes for breast, lung and colorectal cancers in three Italian administrative healthcare databases: a diagnostic accuracy study protocol.意大利三个行政医疗保健数据库中乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌的ICD-9-CM编码的有效性:一项诊断准确性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 25;6(3):e010547. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010547.
4
Validity of breast, lung and colorectal cancer diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review protocol.行政数据库中乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌诊断的有效性:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 18;6(3):e010409. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010409.
5
Validity of Diagnostic Codes for Acute Stroke in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review.行政数据库中急性卒中诊断编码的有效性:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 20;10(8):e0135834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135834. eCollection 2015.
6
Validity of heart failure diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.行政数据库中心力衰竭诊断的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):e104519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104519. eCollection 2014.
7
Validity of myocardial infarction diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review.行政数据库中心肌梗死诊断的有效性:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 28;9(3):e92286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092286. eCollection 2014.
8
The impact of a pay-for-performance system on timing to hip fracture surgery: experience from the Lazio Region (Italy).按绩效付费制度对髋部骨折手术时间的影响:来自拉齐奥地区(意大利)的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 7;13:393. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-393.
9
Validation of healthcare administrative data for the diagnosis of epilepsy.验证医疗保健管理数据用于癫痫诊断。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Dec 1;67(12):1019-24. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202528. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
10
An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.更新的 21 世纪卒中定义:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员声明。
Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2064-89. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca. Epub 2013 May 7.

医疗管理数据库中心血管和脑血管ICD-9-CM编码验证方案:翁布里亚数据价值项目

Protocol for validating cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ICD-9-CM codes in healthcare administrative databases: the Umbria Data Value Project.

作者信息

Cozzolino Francesco, Abraha Iosief, Orso Massimiliano, Mengoni Anna, Cerasa Maria Francesca, Eusebi Paolo, Ambrosio Giuseppe, Montedori Alessandro

机构信息

Health Planning Service, Regional Health Authority of Umbria, Perugia, Italy.

Division of Cardiology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia School of Medicine, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 29;7(3):e013785. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013785.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013785
PMID:28360241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5372118/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Administrative healthcare databases can provide a comprehensive assessment of the burden of diseases in terms of major outcomes, such as mortality, hospital readmissions and use of healthcare resources, thus providing answers to a wide spectrum of research questions. However, a crucial issue is the reliability of information gathered. Aim of this protocol is to validate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for major cardiovascular diseases, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Data from the centralised administrative database of the entire Umbria Region (910 000 residents, located in Central Italy) will be considered. Patients with a first hospital discharge for AMI, HF, AF or stroke, between 2012 and 2014, will be identified in the administrative database using the following groups of ICD-9-CM codes located in primary position: (1) 410.x for AMI; (2) 427.31 for AF; (3) 428 for HF; (4) 433.x1, 434 (excluding 434.x0), 436 for ischaemic stroke, 430 and 431 for haemorrhagic stroke (subarachnoid haemorrhage and intracerebral haemorrhage). A random sample of cases, and of non-cases, will be selected, and the corresponding medical charts retrieved and reviewed for validation by pairs of trained, independent reviewers. For each condition considered, case adjudication of disease will be based on symptoms, laboratory and diagnostic tests, as available in medical charts. Divergences will be resolved by consensus. Sensitivity and specificity with 95% CIs will be calculated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Research protocol has been granted approval by the Regional Ethics Committee. Study results will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.

摘要

引言

行政医疗保健数据库能够根据主要结局,如死亡率、医院再入院率和医疗资源使用情况,对疾病负担进行全面评估,从而为广泛的研究问题提供答案。然而,一个关键问题是所收集信息的可靠性。本方案的目的是验证国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD-9-CM)编码用于主要心血管疾病,包括急性心肌梗死(AMI)、心力衰竭(HF)、心房颤动(AF)和中风。

方法与分析

将考虑来自意大利中部翁布里亚地区整个集中行政数据库的数据(91万居民)。2012年至2014年期间,首次因AMI、HF、AF或中风出院的患者将在行政数据库中使用位于首位的以下几组ICD-9-CM编码进行识别:(1)AMI为410.x;(2)AF为427.31;(3)HF为428;(4)缺血性中风为433.x1、434(不包括434.x0)、436,出血性中风(蛛网膜下腔出血和脑出血)为430和431。将选取病例和非病例的随机样本,并检索相应的病历,由经过培训的独立评审员对进行成对评审以进行验证。对于每种考虑的疾病,疾病的病例判定将基于病历中可用的症状、实验室检查和诊断测试。分歧将通过协商一致解决。将计算95%置信区间的敏感性和特异性。

伦理与传播

研究方案已获得地区伦理委员会的批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物以及在国内和国际会议上的报告广泛传播。