评“公元前 1920 年的大洪灾事件支持中国大洪水和夏朝的历史真实性”一文。
Comment on "Outburst flood at 1920 BCE supports historicity of China's Great Flood and the Xia dynasty".
机构信息
Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
出版信息
Science. 2017 Mar 31;355(6332):1382. doi: 10.1126/science.aal1369.
PMID:28360292
Abstract
By analyzing the data and methodology of Wu (Reports, 5 August 2016, p. 579), I find that their conclusions about the scale of the dammed lake, the dating of the lake, and the peak discharge at the point of dam failure and at the Lajia site cannot be validated. The conjecture of the supposed Great Flood and its impact on the formation of the early Chinese dynasty is not substantiated.
摘要
通过分析吴的（报告，2016 年 8 月 5 日，第 579 页）数据和方法，我发现他们关于堰塞湖规模、湖泊年代以及堰塞湖决堤点和拉甲遗址洪峰流量的结论无法得到验证。关于大洪水的推测及其对中国早期王朝形成的影响也没有得到证实。
Zotero 插件