Suppr超能文献

孟加拉国增加腹膜透析使用的障碍:患者与医护人员调查

Barriers to Increasing Use of Peritoneal Dialysis in Bangladesh: A Survey of Patients and Providers.

作者信息

Savla Dipal, Ahmed Sweety, Yeates Karen, Matthew Anna, Anand Shuchi

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, NY, USA

Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 2017 Mar-Apr;37(2):234-237. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00177.

Abstract

Despite a lower requirement for technology and equipment than hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an underutilized modality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Bangladesh has lowest use of PD in the world (fewer than 2% of prevalent patients). We evaluated nephrologists' attitudes toward PD and examined differences between patients on HD and PD in Dhaka. We asked nephrologists to fill out an English-language questionnaire. Using convenience sampling but targeting both public and private hospitals in Dhaka, we asked trained nurses to administer a Bangla-language questionnaire to patients on HD ( = 116) and PD ( = 41). We validated the questionnaires on a sub-sample ( = 10 for each group). Of the 43 nephrologists surveyed, 27 (63%) had patients on PD. When compared with nephrologists without patients on PD, those with patients on PD were less likely to believe that survival and quality of life on PD was worse than on HD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05 - 0.83 and OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 - 0.67 respectively) but were more likely to have received training for PD. Nephrologists named cost of PD as the predominant barrier to increasing use of PD, followed by concerns about patient hygiene and lack of trained nurses. Fifty-two HD patients (45%) did not know about a home-based modality. When compared with patients on HD, patients on PD were more likely to have been educated by non-nephrologists about dialysis, to be "forewarned" about the need for dialysis, to be paying fully, and to be living in a permanent home with a non-communal water source. Some barriers to increasing access to PD-i.e., patient living conditions and cost-are unique to LMICs. Our study also highlights that issues encountered in high-income countries-i.e., nephrologists' subjective preference and lack of patient knowledge about an alternate modality to HD-may play a role as well.

摘要

尽管腹膜透析(PD)对技术和设备的要求低于血液透析(HD),但在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),它却是一种未得到充分利用的治疗方式。孟加拉国是全球腹膜透析使用率最低的国家(患病率不到2%)。我们评估了肾病学家对腹膜透析的态度,并研究了达卡接受血液透析和腹膜透析的患者之间的差异。我们让肾病学家填写一份英文问卷。采用便利抽样法,但针对达卡的公立医院和私立医院,我们让经过培训的护士向接受血液透析(n = 116)和腹膜透析(n = 41)的患者发放一份孟加拉语问卷。我们在一个子样本(每组n = 10)上对问卷进行了验证。在接受调查的43名肾病学家中,有27名(63%)的患者接受腹膜透析治疗。与没有腹膜透析患者的肾病学家相比,有腹膜透析患者的肾病学家不太可能认为腹膜透析患者的生存率和生活质量比血液透析患者差(优势比[OR]分别为0.21,95%置信区间[CI] 0.05 - 0.83和OR = 0.11,95% CI 0.02 - 0.67),但更有可能接受过腹膜透析培训。肾病学家指出腹膜透析的费用是增加其使用的主要障碍,其次是对患者卫生状况的担忧和缺乏训练有素的护士。52名血液透析患者(45%)不知道有居家治疗方式。与接受血液透析的患者相比,接受腹膜透析的患者更有可能由非肾病学家进行透析教育,更有可能提前得知透析需求,全额付费,并且居住在有非公共水源的固定住所。增加腹膜透析可及性的一些障碍,如患者生活条件和费用,是低收入和中等收入国家所特有的。我们的研究还强调,高收入国家遇到的问题,如肾病学家的主观偏好和患者对血液透析替代方式缺乏了解,可能也起到了一定作用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing education in Bangladesh: a social business model.孟加拉国的护理教育:一种社会商业模式。
Int Nurs Rev. 2016 Jun;63(2):285-91. doi: 10.1111/inr.12243. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
4
Peritoneal dialysis-first policy made successful: perspectives and actions.腹膜透析优先策略取得成功:观点与行动。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Nov;62(5):993-1005. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.03.038. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
5
Cost of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis across the world.全球腹膜透析和血液透析的成本。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Oct;28(10):2553-69. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft214. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
6
Global trends in rates of peritoneal dialysis.全球腹膜透析率趋势。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Mar;23(3):533-44. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011060607. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验