Suppr超能文献

影响发展中国家终末期肾病透析方式的因素:对菲律宾肾病学家的调查。

Factors influencing dialysis modality for end-stage renal disease in developing countries: a survey of Filipino nephrologists.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy.

出版信息

Blood Purif. 2011;32(2):117-23. doi: 10.1159/000324396. Epub 2011 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Philippines, 86% of incident dialysis patients are started on hemodialysis (HD) and 14% are treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD), representing a decline over a 2-year period. One important factor which affects patients' choice of dialysis modality is the input of their physicians. Our objective was to identify the factors affecting attitudes and recommendations of Filipino nephrologists regarding HD and PD.

METHODS

Attendees of the annual national nephrology meeting completed an anonymous self-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

Respondents were heavily involved in clinical dialysis work, and 86.7% had most/all of their patients on HD. Recommendations about dialysis modality were based most strongly on overall cost to patient (4.4 on a scale of 1 [not important] to 5 [most important], residual renal function (RRF) preservation (4.4), patient preference (4.3) availability of dialysis support staff (4.3), and comparative quality of life data (4.3). Least important was physician reimbursement (2.8). Patient-related factors favoring HD were: poor personal hygiene, impaired vision and manual dexterity; while favoring PD were: age <10 years, living far from HD unit, and the availability of trainable family members. When asked which modality they would recommend to an equally eligible patient, 49.2% responded they would not recommend either modality and would allow the patient to choose, while 40.7% would recommend HD and 10.2% would recommend PD.

CONCLUSION

Respondents consider overall cost and RRF preservation as the most important factors in dialysis modality selection, yet only 10.2% would recommend PD as first choice. It is likely that factors other than those addressed in the survey are stronger determinants of the patient's final choice of modality.

摘要

背景

在菲律宾,86%的新发病透析患者开始接受血液透析(HD)治疗,14%接受腹膜透析(PD)治疗,这一比例在两年内有所下降。影响患者透析方式选择的一个重要因素是医生的意见。我们的目的是确定影响菲律宾肾病医生对 HD 和 PD 的态度和建议的因素。

方法

参加年度全国肾病会议的代表完成了一份匿名的自我管理问卷。

结果

受访者主要参与临床透析工作,86.7%的患者接受 HD 治疗。关于透析方式的建议主要基于对患者的总体成本(4.4 分,1 分为不重要,5 分为最重要)、残余肾功能(RRF)保留(4.4 分)、患者偏好(4.3 分)、透析支持人员的可用性(4.3 分)和比较生活质量数据(4.3 分)。医生报酬(2.8 分)最重要。支持 HD 的患者相关因素包括:个人卫生差、视力和手眼协调能力受损;支持 PD 的因素包括:年龄<10 岁、居住离 HD 单位较远、有可培训的家庭成员。当被问及他们会向同等合格的患者推荐哪种治疗方式时,49.2%的人表示他们不会推荐任何一种治疗方式,而是让患者选择,而 40.7%的人会推荐 HD,10.2%的人会推荐 PD。

结论

受访者认为总体成本和 RRF 保留是选择透析方式的最重要因素,但只有 10.2%的人会将 PD 作为首选。除了调查中涉及的因素外,其他因素可能是患者最终选择治疗方式的更重要决定因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验