Chandrappa Mallikarjun Honnenahalli, Hajibandeh Shahin, Hajibandeh Shahab
Trauma and Orthopaedic Department, Queen's Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.
General Surgery Department, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Haslingden Rd, Blackburn BB2 3HH, United Kingdom.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
Our objective was to perform a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the effect of initial varus or valgus displacement of proximal humerus on the outcomes of patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation.
In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, we performed a systematic review. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched to identify randomised and non-randomised studies comparing postoperative outcomes associated with initial varus versus initial valgus displacement of proximal humerus fracture. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of the selected studies. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data.
We identified two retrospective cohort studies and one retrospective analysis of a prospective database, enrolling a total of 243 patients with proximal humerus fractures. Our analysis showed that initial varus displacement was associated with a higher risk of overall complication (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.12-4.64, = 0.02), screw penetration (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06-5.02, = 0.04), varus displacement (RR 4.38, 95% CI 2.22-8.65, < 0.0001), and reoperation (RR 3.01, 95% CI 1.80-5.03, < 0.0001) compared to valgus displacement. There was no significant difference in avascular necrosis (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.62-3.27, = 0.40), infection (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.46-4.84, = 0.51), and non-union or malunion (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.37-5.04, = 0.64).
The best available evidence demonstrates that initial varus displacement of proximal humerus fractures is associated with higher risk of overall complication, screw penetration, varus displacement, and reoperation compared to initial valgus displacement. The best available evidence is not adequately robust to make definitive conclusions. Further high quality studies, that are adequately powered, are required to investigate the outcomes of initial varus and valgus displacement in specific fracture types.
Level II.
我们的目的是对文献进行系统评价并进行荟萃分析,以研究肱骨近端初始内翻或外翻移位对接受切开复位内固定治疗的肱骨近端骨折患者预后的影响。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明标准,我们进行了一项系统评价。检索了电子数据库MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL),以识别比较肱骨近端骨折初始内翻与初始外翻移位相关术后结果的随机和非随机研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估所选研究的方法学质量和偏倚风险。应用固定效应或随机效应模型计算汇总结果数据。
我们确定了两项回顾性队列研究和一项对前瞻性数据库的回顾性分析,共纳入243例肱骨近端骨折患者。我们的分析表明,与外翻移位相比,初始内翻移位与总体并发症(RR 2.28,95%CI 1.12 - 4.64,P = 0.02)、螺钉穿透(RR 2.30,95%CI 1.06 - 5.02,P = 0.04)、内翻移位(RR 4.38,95%CI 2.22 - 8.65,P < 0.0001)和再次手术(RR 3.01,95%CI 1.80 - 5.03,P < 0.0001)的风险更高相关。在缺血性坏死(RR 1.43,95%CI 0.62 - 3.27,P = 0.40)、感染(RR 1.49,95%CI 0.46 - 4.84,P = 0.51)以及骨不连或畸形愈合(RR 1.37,95%CI 0.37 - 5.04,P = 0.64)方面没有显著差异。
现有最佳证据表明,与初始外翻移位相比,肱骨近端骨折的初始内翻移位与总体并发症、螺钉穿透、内翻移位和再次手术的风险更高相关。现有最佳证据不够有力,无法得出明确结论。需要进一步开展有足够效力的高质量研究,以调查特定骨折类型中初始内翻和外翻移位的预后。
二级。