Fan Wenbin, Cui Xueliang, Shi Liu, Xie Tian, Rui Yunfeng, Chen Hui
Department of Orthopaedics, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P. R. China.
Trauma Center, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P. R. China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Mar 15;36(3):274-278. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202107003.
To compare the effectiveness of locking plate and intramedullary nail in treatment of Neer two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 elderly patients with Neer two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus met the selection criteria between January 2015 and December 2018. Forty-six patients were treated with locking plate fixation (locking plate group), and 40 patients with intramedullary nail fixation (intramedullary nail group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, fracture side and type, time from injury to operation, and comorbidities between the two groups ( >0.05). Visual analogue scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, and shoulder range of motion (forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation) were compared between the two groups. X-ray films were taken to assess the fracture healing, and the neck-shaft angle was measured at 2 days after operation and at last follow-up, and the difference between the two time points was calculated.
Patients in both groups were followed up 18-40 months, with an average of 30.4 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups ( =-0.986, =0.327). X-ray films reexamination showed that the fractures of two groups healed, and the healing time was (11.3±2.1) weeks in locking plate group and (10.3±2.0) weeks in intramedullary nail group, which had significant difference between the two groups ( =2.250, =0.027). The difference of neck-shaft angle was (7.63±7.01)° in locking plate group and (2.85±2.82)° in intramedullary nail group, which had significant difference between the two groups ( =4.032, <0.001). There was no significant difference in Constant-Murley score, ASES score, VAS score, and shoulder range of motion between the two groups at last follow-up ( >0.05). Complications occurred in 13 cases (28.3%) of locking plate group and in 4 cases (10.0%) of intramedullary nail group, and the difference between the two groups was significant ( =4.498, =0.034).
Both locking plates and intramedullary nails can be used for the treatment of Neer two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. The intramedullary nail fixation surgery is more minimally invasive, which has fewer postoperative complications and faster fracture healing.
比较锁定钢板与髓内钉治疗老年肱骨近端Neer二、三部分骨折的疗效。
回顾性分析2015年1月至2018年12月间86例符合入选标准的老年肱骨近端Neer二、三部分骨折患者。46例患者采用锁定钢板固定(锁定钢板组),40例患者采用髓内钉固定(髓内钉组)。两组患者在性别、年龄、受伤原因、骨折侧别及类型、受伤至手术时间、合并症等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。比较两组患者视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国肩肘外科(ASES)评分、Constant-Murley评分及肩关节活动度(前屈、外展及外旋)。拍摄X线片评估骨折愈合情况,于术后2天及末次随访时测量颈干角,并计算两个时间点的差值。
两组患者均随访18~40个月,平均30.4个月。两组随访时间差异无统计学意义(t=-0.986,P=0.327)。X线片复查显示两组骨折均愈合,锁定钢板组愈合时间为(11.3±2.1)周,髓内钉组为(10.3±2.0)周,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.250,P=0.027)。锁定钢板组颈干角差值为(7.63±7.01)°,髓内钉组为(2.85±2.82)°,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=4.032,P<0.001)。末次随访时两组Constant-Murley评分、ASES评分、VAS评分及肩关节活动度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。锁定钢板组发生并发症13例(28.3%),髓内钉组发生4例(10.0%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ²=4.498,P=0.034)。
锁定钢板和髓内钉均可用于治疗老年肱骨近端Neer二、三部分骨折。髓内钉固定手术创伤更小,术后并发症更少,骨折愈合更快。