Özge Aynur
Mersin University, Medical Faculty, Department of Neurology, Mersin, Turkey.
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Aug;50(Suppl 1):S8-S13. doi: 10.4274/npa.y7279. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
Transforming a subjective sense like headache into an objective state and establishing a common language for this complaint which can be both a symptom and a disease all by itself have kept the investigators busy for years. Each recommendation proposed has brought along a set of patients who do not meet the criteria. While almost the most ideal and most comprehensive classification studies continued at this point, this time criticisims about withdrawing from daily practice came to the fore. In this article, the classification adventure of scientists who work in the area of headache will be summarized. More specifically, 2 classifications made by the International Headache Society (IHS) and the point reached in relation with the 3rd classification which is still being worked on will be discussed together with headache subtypes. It has been presented with the wish and belief that it will contribute to the readers and young investigators who are interested in this subject.
将头痛这种主观感受转化为客观状态，并为这种既可以是症状又可以自成一种疾病的主诉建立一种通用语言，多年来一直让研究人员忙碌不已。每一项提出的建议都带来了一组不符合标准的患者。此时，几乎最理想、最全面的分类研究仍在继续，但关于脱离日常实践的批评开始凸显。在本文中，将总结头痛领域科学家的分类历程。更具体地说，将结合头痛亚型一起讨论国际头痛协会（IHS）进行的两种分类以及与仍在进行中的第三种分类相关的进展情况。希望并相信它将对关注该主题的读者和年轻研究人员有所帮助。
