Aktekin Berrin
Department of Neurology, Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015 Jun;52(2):109-110. doi: 10.5152/npa.2015.110210. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
The classification of epileptic seizures and epilepsies is a subject of interest in various medical disciplines (such as neurology, pediatric neurology, molecular biology and genetics, neurosurgery, pharmacology, radiology, histopathology), and each of them requires a different approach in their practice. In last 15 years, enormous amount of debate in which irrelevant to actual level of knowledge, were ongoing in the literature. Epilepsy classification is a fundamental tool that impacts not only daily clinical practice but also research era and education. The current lack of consensus in this field causes a serious obstacle in patient management, student and resident education, and information sharing among different scientific interest groups. The comparison of different classification proposals by means of positive and negative aspects is beyond the scope of discussion in this article; therefore, I will try to give a brief summary of our current level of understanding. Main issues regarding the classifications proposal are as follows: Concepts of epileptic seizure/epilepsy/syndromeFocal & generalized epilepsy conceptIdiopathic, genetic, cryptogenic, and symptomatic (structural/metabolic) concepts.
癫痫发作和癫痫的分类是多个医学学科(如神经病学、儿童神经病学、分子生物学与遗传学、神经外科、药理学、放射学、组织病理学)关注的课题,并且每个学科在实践中都需要采用不同的方法。在过去15年里,文献中一直存在大量与实际知识水平无关的争论。癫痫分类是一个不仅影响日常临床实践,而且影响研究时代和教育的基本工具。目前该领域缺乏共识在患者管理、学生和住院医师教育以及不同科学兴趣群体之间的信息共享方面造成了严重障碍。通过正反两方面对不同分类建议进行比较超出了本文的讨论范围;因此,我将尝试简要总结一下我们目前的理解水平。关于分类建议的主要问题如下:癫痫发作/癫痫/综合征的概念;局灶性和全身性癫痫概念;特发性、遗传性、隐源性和症状性(结构性/代谢性)概念。