Goodman Jessie L, Amendola Laura M, Horike-Pyne Martha, Trinidad Susan B, Fullerton Stephanie M, Burke Wylie, Jarvik Gail P
Division of Medical Genetics University of Washington Seattle Washington.
Department of Bioethics and Humanities University of Washington Seattle Washington.
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017 Jan 16;5(2):172-176. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.274. eCollection 2017 Mar.
Legal and ethical questions arise regarding disseminating genetic research results to family members in the event of a research participant's death; failure to return or return to legal next of kin or estate executor may not reflect participant desires. We sought to determine participant preferences for whether and to whom they would like their data released in the case of their death prior to receiving genomic results, focusing on whether the person selected was also their estate executor.
The University of Washington NEXT Medicine Study of the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research program previously reported participant preferences regarding designating an individual to receive genomic results in the event of death, including whether they want results shared, and if so, with what person. Participants were also asked whether this designee is executor of their will or estate.
To date, 61 individuals were asked about the concordance of their study designee and legal representative: 42 (69%) reported having a will or estate plan and of these, 14 (33%) chose someone other than their executor to receive their results. For the 14 who chose someone other than their estate executor to receive genetic results, 12 (86%) chose a family member, typically a biological relative, as their designee. Those with a different genomic designee than their executor were less likely to be partnered ( = 0.0024). For those partnered participants without an estate plan, spouses were not always chosen for return of genomic results.
For one-third of our participants, the individual deemed most appropriate by the participant to receive their genomic results was not the executor. In the absence of an explicit designation, HIPAA may prohibit access to genomic results to persons other than the executor; hence asking for designation at the time of study enrollment (or initiation of clinical testing) is important.
在研究参与者死亡的情况下,向其家庭成员公布基因研究结果会引发法律和伦理问题;不将结果返还或返还给合法的近亲或遗产执行人可能无法反映参与者的意愿。我们试图确定参与者对于在其死亡且尚未收到基因组结果的情况下,是否以及希望将其数据发布给何人(尤其关注所选之人是否也是其遗产执行人)的偏好。
华盛顿大学临床测序探索性研究项目的“下一代医学研究”先前报告了参与者对于指定某人在其死亡时接收基因组结果的偏好,包括他们是否希望结果被分享,若希望分享,则与何人分享。参与者还被问及该指定接收者是否为其遗嘱或遗产的执行人。
迄今为止,61人被问及他们指定的研究接收者与法定代表人是否一致:42人(69%)报告有遗嘱或遗产计划,其中14人(33%)选择了非遗嘱执行人的其他人来接收他们的结果。在这14名选择非遗产执行人的其他人来接收基因结果的人中,12人(86%)选择了家庭成员,通常是血亲,作为其指定接收者。指定的基因组接收者与遗嘱执行人不同的人结婚的可能性较小(P = 0.0024)。对于那些没有遗产计划的已婚参与者,配偶并不总是被选为基因组结果的接收者。
对于我们三分之一的参与者而言,参与者认为最适合接收其基因组结果的人并非遗嘱执行人。在没有明确指定的情况下,《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)可能会禁止除遗嘱执行人之外的其他人获取基因组结果;因此,在研究入组时(或开始临床检测时)要求进行指定非常重要。