Bokenberger Kathleen, Ström Peter, Dahl Aslan Anna K, Åkerstedt Torbjörn, Pedersen Nancy L
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Sep 1;43(5):485-493. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3638. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
Objectives The few studies of shift work and late life cognitive functioning have yielded mixed findings. The aim of the present study is to estimate the association between shift-work experience and change in cognitive performance before and after retirement age among older adults who were gainfully employed. Methods Five hundred and ninety five participants with no dementia were followed up for a mean of 17.6 standard deviation (SD) 8.8 years from a Swedish population-based sample. Participants had self-reported information on any type of shift-work experience (ever/never) in 1984 and measures of cognitive performance (verbal, spatial, memory, processing speed, and general cognitive ability) from up to 9 waves of cognitive assessments during 1986-2012. Night work history (ever/never) from 1998-2002 was available from a subsample (N=320). Early adult cognitive test scores were available for 77 men. Results In latent growth curve modeling, there were no main effects of "any-type" or night shift work on the mean scores or rate of change in any of the cognitive domains. An interaction effect between any-type shift work and education on cognitive performance at retirement was noted. Lower-educated shift workers performed better on cognitive tests than lower-educated day workers at retirement. Sensitivity analyses, however, indicated that the interactions appeared to be driven by selection effects. Lower-educated day workers demonstrated poorer cognitive ability in early adulthood than lower-educated shift workers, who may have selected jobs entailing higher cognitive demand. Conclusion There was no difference in late-life cognitive aging between individuals with a history of working shifts compared to those who had typical day work schedules during midlife.
关于轮班工作与晚年认知功能的研究较少,结果也不一致。本研究的目的是评估在有酬工作的老年人中,轮班工作经历与退休前后认知表现变化之间的关联。方法:从瑞典一个基于人群的样本中选取595名无痴呆症的参与者,平均随访17.6年(标准差8.8年)。参与者在1984年自行报告了任何类型的轮班工作经历(曾经/从未),并在1986 - 2012年期间进行的多达9次认知评估中提供了认知表现(语言、空间、记忆、处理速度和一般认知能力)的测量数据。1998 - 2002年的夜班工作经历(曾经/从未)可从一个子样本(N = 320)中获取。77名男性有成年早期的认知测试分数。结果:在潜在增长曲线模型中,“任何类型”或夜班工作对任何认知领域的平均分数或变化率均无主要影响。注意到任何类型的轮班工作与教育程度之间对退休时认知表现存在交互作用。退休时,受教育程度较低的轮班工作者在认知测试中的表现优于受教育程度较低的日班工作者。然而,敏感性分析表明,这种交互作用似乎是由选择效应驱动的。受教育程度较低的日班工作者在成年早期的认知能力比受教育程度较低的轮班工作者差,后者可能选择了需要更高认知需求的工作。结论:与中年时期有典型日班工作时间表的人相比,有轮班工作经历的人在晚年认知衰老方面没有差异。