• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以色列一家三级儿童医院中儿科加拿大分诊 acuity 量表的有效性。

Validity of the Pediatric Canadian Triage Acuity Scale in a tertiary children's hospital in Israel.

机构信息

Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology.

Department of Pediatric Emergency.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;25(4):270-273. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000464.

DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000464
PMID:28362647
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2015, the Israeli Ministry of Health issued national guidelines demanding the use of a five-level triage system in pediatric emergency departments (EDs). The present study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Pediatric Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (PedCTAS) in the ED of a tertiary children's hospital in Israel.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted between January 2011 and December 2015 was carried out. The proportion of hospitalization was the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcomes were proportion of admissions to the ICU, proportions of patients who left without being seen (LWBS), and length of stay (LOS) in the ED.

RESULTS

A total of 83 609 patients were included in our analysis. Triage levels 1-5 included 533 (0.6%), 4428 (5.3%), 46 461 (55.6%), 28 510 (34.1%), and 3677 (4.4%) patients, respectively. Hospitalization proportions were 70, 51, 28, 15, and 12% for triage levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Admission proportions to ICU were 24.2, 3.05, 0.24, 0.05, and 0.05% for PedCTAS levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The proportions of LWBS were 0.001, 0.002, and 0.005% for triage levels 3, 4, and 5, respectively. LOS was shorter as the triage level increased from 2 to 5.

CONCLUSION

Triage level was predictive of hospitalization, admission to the ICU, and proportions of LWBS and LOS in the ED. The findings suggest validity of the PedCTAS in this cohort. This is the first report of the performance of a triage tool in an Israeli ED.

摘要

目的

2015 年,以色列卫生部发布国家指南,要求在儿科急诊部门(ED)使用五级分诊系统。本研究旨在评估儿科加拿大分诊 acuity 量表(PedCTAS)在以色列一家三级儿童医院 ED 的有效性。

方法

对 2011 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间所有入院患者进行回顾性队列研究。住院比例为主要结局指标。次要结局指标包括 ICU 收治比例、未就诊离开(LWBS)患者比例和 ED 停留时间(LOS)。

结果

共纳入 83609 例患者进行分析。1-5 级分诊分别包括 533 例(0.6%)、4428 例(5.3%)、46461 例(55.6%)、28510 例(34.1%)和 3677 例(4.4%)患者。1、2、3、4、5 级分诊的住院比例分别为 70%、51%、28%、15%和 12%。1、2、3、4、5 级 PedCTAS 分别有 24.2%、3.05%、0.24%、0.05%和 0.05%的患者收入 ICU。LWBS 的比例分别为 3 级、4 级和 5 级分诊的 0.001%、0.002%和 0.005%。分诊级别从 2 级升高到 5 级时,LOS 越短。

结论

分诊级别可预测住院、收入 ICU、LWBS 比例和 ED LOS。研究结果表明该分诊工具在本队列中具有有效性。这是以色列 ED 使用分诊工具的首份报告。

相似文献

1
Validity of the Pediatric Canadian Triage Acuity Scale in a tertiary children's hospital in Israel.以色列一家三级儿童医院中儿科加拿大分诊 acuity 量表的有效性。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;25(4):270-273. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000464.
2
Performance of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a multicenter database study.加拿大儿童分诊和 acuity 量表的表现:一项多中心数据库研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;61(1):27-32.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.05.024. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
3
The Singapore Paediatric Triage Scale Validation Study.新加坡儿科分诊量表验证研究。
Singapore Med J. 2018 Apr;59(4):205-209. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017093. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
4
Validation of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale at the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Children's Hospital in Costa Rica.哥斯达黎加一家三级儿童医院急诊科对加拿大儿科分诊与 acuity 量表的验证。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“急症严重程度量表”,但按要求未做修改。)
Cureus. 2021 Jul 5;13(7):e16191. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16191. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a prospective multicenter evaluation.加拿大儿童分诊与 acuity 量表:一项前瞻性多中心评估。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):71-7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
6
Validity of the Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care hospital.加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表在三级护理医院中的有效性。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity scale” ,直译为“ acuity量表” ,这里按推测完整翻译为“分诊及 acuity 量表” ,具体需结合完整文本进一步确认。)
CJEM. 2009 Jan;11(1):23-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500010885.
7
Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in adults: a cohort study.日本意识与分诊量表在成年人中的有效性:一项队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jun;35(6):384-388. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207214. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.
9
Validity of the Japan Acuity and Triage Scale in elderly patients: A cohort study.日本 acuity 与分诊量表在老年患者中的有效性:一项队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;37(12):2159-2164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center.三级护理中心护士对加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表的评分者间一致性。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity scale”,意为“ acuity 量表”,这里按推测翻译。)
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of the Roles and Implementation of Pediatric Emergency Triage Systems in China and Other Countries.中国及其他国家儿科急诊分诊系统的角色和实施综述。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Dec 5;29:e941582. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941582.
2
Predictive Validity of a New Triage System for Outcomes in Patients Visiting Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Nationwide Study in Korea.一种用于儿科急诊科就诊患者结局的新型分诊系统的预测效度:韩国的一项全国性研究。
Children (Basel). 2023 May 25;10(6):935. doi: 10.3390/children10060935.
3
Elevated Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is Associated with Severe Asthma Exacerbation in Children.
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值升高与儿童重度哮喘急性发作相关。
J Clin Med. 2023 May 6;12(9):3312. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093312.
4
Validity of the Paediatric Canadian Triage Acuity Scale in a Tertiary Hospital: An Analysis of Severity Markers' Variability.儿科加拿大分诊 acuity 量表在三级医院的有效性:严重程度标志物可变性分析。
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 30;47(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01913-8.
5
Validity of the Brazilian pediatric triage system CLARIPED at a secondary level of emergency care.巴西儿科分诊系统 CLARIPED 在二级急救中的有效性。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023 May-Jun;99(3):247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.10.005. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Triage performance in adolescent patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Israel.以色列青少年 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的分诊表现。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;59:70-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.061. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
7
Validity of the computerized version of the pediatric triage system CLARIPED for emergency care.儿科分诊系统 CLARIPED 计算机版在急诊中的有效性。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022 Jul-Aug;98(4):369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Validation of the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale at the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Children's Hospital in Costa Rica.哥斯达黎加一家三级儿童医院急诊科对加拿大儿科分诊与 acuity 量表的验证。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“急症严重程度量表”,但按要求未做修改。)
Cureus. 2021 Jul 5;13(7):e16191. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16191. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on children with asthma-related symptoms: A tertiary care center experience.COVID-19 封锁对哮喘相关症状儿童的影响:一家三级保健中心的经验。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Sep;56(9):2825-2832. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25505. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
10
Promptly reporting of critical laboratory values in pediatrics: A work in progress.及时报告儿科危急检验值:一项正在进行的工作。
World J Clin Pediatr. 2018 Nov 12;7(5):105-110. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v7.i5.105.