• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大儿童分诊和 acuity 量表的表现:一项多中心数据库研究。

Performance of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a multicenter database study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;61(1):27-32.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.05.024. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.05.024
PMID:22841173
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We evaluate the association between triage levels assigned using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and surrogate markers of validity for real-life children triaged in multiple emergency departments (EDs).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating the triage assessment and outcomes of all children presenting to 12 pediatric EDs, all of which are members of the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada group, during a 1-year period (2010 to 2011). Anonymous data were retrieved from the ED computerized databases. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of children hospitalized for each triage level. Other outcomes were ICU admission, proportion of patients who left without being seen by a physician, and length of stay in the ED. Evaluation of all children visiting these EDs during 1 year was expected to provide more than 1,000 patients in each triage category.

RESULTS

A total of 550,940 children were included. Pooled data demonstrated hospitalization proportions of 61%, 30%, 10%, 2%, and 0.9% for patients in Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. There was a strong association between triage level and admission to the ICU, probability of leaving without being seen by a physician, and length of stay.

CONCLUSION

The strong association between triage level and multiple markers of severity in 12 Canadian pediatric EDs suggests validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children.

摘要

研究目的

我们评估了加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表(Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale)分配的分诊级别与多个急诊部(ED)分诊的现实生活中儿童的有效性替代指标之间的关联。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,评估了 2010 年至 2011 年期间,12 个儿科急诊部(均为儿科急诊研究加拿大组织的成员)的所有儿童的分诊评估和结局。从 ED 计算机数据库中检索匿名数据。主要结局指标是每个分诊级别住院的儿童比例。其他结局包括 ICU 入院、未被医生看到的患者比例以及 ED 停留时间。预计对这些 ED 中 1 年内就诊的所有儿童进行评估,每个分诊类别将提供超过 1000 名患者。

结果

共纳入 550940 名儿童。汇总数据显示,加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表级别 1、2、3、4 和 5 的患者住院比例分别为 61%、30%、10%、2%和 0.9%。分诊级别与 ICU 入院、未被医生看到的可能性以及 ED 停留时间之间存在很强的关联。

结论

在 12 个加拿大儿科 ED 中,分诊级别与多种严重程度标志物之间的强关联表明加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表对儿童具有有效性。

相似文献

1
Performance of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a multicenter database study.加拿大儿童分诊和 acuity 量表的表现:一项多中心数据库研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;61(1):27-32.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.05.024. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
2
The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children: a prospective multicenter evaluation.加拿大儿童分诊与 acuity 量表:一项前瞻性多中心评估。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;60(1):71-7.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
3
Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center.三级护理中心护士对加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表的评分者间一致性。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity scale”,意为“ acuity 量表”,这里按推测翻译。)
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
4
Validity of the Pediatric Canadian Triage Acuity Scale in a tertiary children's hospital in Israel.以色列一家三级儿童医院中儿科加拿大分诊 acuity 量表的有效性。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;25(4):270-273. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000464.
5
Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (version 3) triage algorithm in pediatric patients.儿科患者中急诊严重程度指数(第3版)分诊算法的评估
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;12(3):219-24. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.09.023.
6
Validity of the Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care hospital.加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表在三级护理医院中的有效性。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity scale” ,直译为“ acuity量表” ,这里按推测完整翻译为“分诊及 acuity 量表” ,具体需结合完整文本进一步确认。)
CJEM. 2009 Jan;11(1):23-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500010885.
7
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.
8
An adapted triage tool (ETAT) at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital Medical Emergency Unit, Cape Town: an evaluation.开普敦红十字会战争纪念儿童医院医疗急救单位的改良分诊工具(ETAT):评估。
S Afr Med J. 2012 Dec 31;103(3):161-5. doi: 10.7196/samj.6020.
9
The Singapore Paediatric Triage Scale Validation Study.新加坡儿科分诊量表验证研究。
Singapore Med J. 2018 Apr;59(4):205-209. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017093. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
10
Patients who leave the pediatric emergency department without being seen: a case-control study.未就诊便离开儿科急诊科的患者:一项病例对照研究。
CMAJ. 2005 Jan 4;172(1):39-43. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031817.

引用本文的文献

1
Aspects of triage for infants: a narrative review.婴儿分诊的各个方面:一篇叙述性综述。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Apr 12;184(5):294. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06127-3.
2
A national cross-sectional survey of health literacy of caregivers attending Canadian pediatric emergency departments.一项针对前往加拿大儿科急诊科的护理人员健康素养的全国性横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 20;19(12):e0314826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314826. eCollection 2024.
3
Randomized controlled open-label trial to evaluate prioritization software for the secondary triage of patients in the pediatric emergency department.
评估儿科急诊科患者二级分诊优先排序软件的随机对照开放标签试验。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 8;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00623-3.
4
Factors Affecting Length of Stay in Pediatric Emergency Department in a Teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia.影响沙特阿拉伯一家教学医院儿科急诊停留时间的因素。
Med Arch. 2023;77(4):268-275. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2023.77.268-275.
5
Management of fever and acute painful crises in children with sickle cell disease in emergency departments: a tertiary hospital experience.急诊科对镰状细胞病患儿发热及急性疼痛危象的管理:一家三级医院的经验
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 12;11:1195040. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1195040. eCollection 2023.
6
Predictive Validity of a New Triage System for Outcomes in Patients Visiting Pediatric Emergency Departments: A Nationwide Study in Korea.一种用于儿科急诊科就诊患者结局的新型分诊系统的预测效度:韩国的一项全国性研究。
Children (Basel). 2023 May 25;10(6):935. doi: 10.3390/children10060935.
7
Development of outcomes for evaluating emergency care triage: a Delphi approach.制定用于评估急诊分诊结局的方法:德尔菲法。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 25;31(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01073-1.
8
Validity of the Paediatric Canadian Triage Acuity Scale in a Tertiary Hospital: An Analysis of Severity Markers' Variability.儿科加拿大分诊 acuity 量表在三级医院的有效性:严重程度标志物可变性分析。
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 30;47(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01913-8.
9
Triage Grading and Correct Diagnosis Are Critical for the Emergency Treatment of Anaphylaxis.分诊分级和正确诊断对过敏性反应的紧急治疗至关重要。
Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;9(12):1794. doi: 10.3390/children9121794.
10
Validity of the Brazilian pediatric triage system CLARIPED at a secondary level of emergency care.巴西儿科分诊系统 CLARIPED 在二级急救中的有效性。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023 May-Jun;99(3):247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.10.005. Epub 2022 Nov 18.