Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;61(1):27-32.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.05.024. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
We evaluate the association between triage levels assigned using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and surrogate markers of validity for real-life children triaged in multiple emergency departments (EDs).
This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating the triage assessment and outcomes of all children presenting to 12 pediatric EDs, all of which are members of the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada group, during a 1-year period (2010 to 2011). Anonymous data were retrieved from the ED computerized databases. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of children hospitalized for each triage level. Other outcomes were ICU admission, proportion of patients who left without being seen by a physician, and length of stay in the ED. Evaluation of all children visiting these EDs during 1 year was expected to provide more than 1,000 patients in each triage category.
A total of 550,940 children were included. Pooled data demonstrated hospitalization proportions of 61%, 30%, 10%, 2%, and 0.9% for patients in Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. There was a strong association between triage level and admission to the ICU, probability of leaving without being seen by a physician, and length of stay.
The strong association between triage level and multiple markers of severity in 12 Canadian pediatric EDs suggests validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children.
我们评估了加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表(Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale)分配的分诊级别与多个急诊部(ED)分诊的现实生活中儿童的有效性替代指标之间的关联。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,评估了 2010 年至 2011 年期间,12 个儿科急诊部(均为儿科急诊研究加拿大组织的成员)的所有儿童的分诊评估和结局。从 ED 计算机数据库中检索匿名数据。主要结局指标是每个分诊级别住院的儿童比例。其他结局包括 ICU 入院、未被医生看到的患者比例以及 ED 停留时间。预计对这些 ED 中 1 年内就诊的所有儿童进行评估,每个分诊类别将提供超过 1000 名患者。
共纳入 550940 名儿童。汇总数据显示,加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表级别 1、2、3、4 和 5 的患者住院比例分别为 61%、30%、10%、2%和 0.9%。分诊级别与 ICU 入院、未被医生看到的可能性以及 ED 停留时间之间存在很强的关联。
在 12 个加拿大儿科 ED 中,分诊级别与多种严重程度标志物之间的强关联表明加拿大分诊和 acuity 量表对儿童具有有效性。